Troubleshoot GKE TPU performance degradation with ML Diagnostics Workload Monitoring
Diagnose and mitigate Cloud TPU training throughput drops and step-time
regressions (15%+ drop in TPU duty cycle) on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) by
correlating ML Diagnostics Workload Monitoring MonitoredEvent analyzer
reports with 1-minute Cloud Monitoring system metrics and GKE node topology
labels.
Prerequisites
- Tools: Install the
Google Cloud SDK (
gcloud with
alpha component for gcloud alpha mldiagnostics) and kubectl.
- Cloud Billing & Project Configuration: Verify an active billing account is
linked (
gcloud billing projects describe {project_id}), authenticate
(gcloud auth login), set the target project (gcloud config set project {project_id}), and ensure container.googleapis.com,
monitoring.googleapis.com, and hypercomputecluster.googleapis.com are
enabled.
- Supported workloads and GKE versions: Google Cloud ML Diagnostics only
supports JAX on TPUs (see
ML Diagnostics platform).
Workload Monitoring is enabled by default, supports the
jobset and job GKE
job types, and is compatible with GKE versions 1.36.0-gke.4681000 and later,
as stated in
Configure GKE for ML Diagnostics.
If a workload uses another framework (such as PyTorch) or another custom
resource type, gcloud alpha mldiagnostics won't list ML runs or monitored
events for it. On-demand profiling (Step 4 Path A) additionally requires the
cluster setup described in that document.
- Required IAM Roles:
- Cluster Director Editor (
roles/hypercomputecluster.editor), the role
listed in the "IAM permissions" section of
ML Diagnostics platform,
for the ML Diagnostics CLI and API calls in this skill (ML runs, monitored
events, and on-demand profiler sessions)
- Monitoring Viewer (
roles/monitoring.viewer) for the PromQL queries in Step
2
- Kubernetes Engine Viewer (
roles/container.viewer) for the kubectl get nodes query in Step 3
- For remediation (
[High Risk] steps): Kubernetes Engine Cluster Admin
(roles/container.clusterAdmin)
- Reference Documentation:
- ML Diagnostics platform
(Sections: "IAM permissions")
- Configure GKE for ML Diagnostics
(Sections: "Set up with gcloud CLI, Google Cloud console, or Terraform",
"Manual installation", "Connection-operator")
- Workload monitoring with ML Diagnostics
(Sections: "Workload Monitoring and analyzers", "HBM Capacity Analyzer",
"Host Memory Utilization Analyzer", "CPU Utilization Analyzer", "Access
Workload Monitoring information through the API", "List all monitored
events", "System Metrics")
- Get started with the ML Diagnostics CLI
(Sections: "List machine learning runs", "Monitored-events commands", "List
profiler targets", "Capture on-demand profiler sessions")
- Scale container resource requests and limits
(Sections: "Identify workloads without resource requests or limits")
- Auto-repair nodes
(Sections: "Repair criteria", "Verify node auto-repair is enabled for a
Standard node pool", "Enable auto-repair for an existing Standard node
pool", "Node auto repair in TPU slice nodes")
- Deploy TPU workloads in GKE Standard
(Sections: "Configure auto repair for TPU slice nodes")
- Get support
(Sections: "Before you contact support")
Read-only rule: Run read-only diagnostic commands only. Never drain,
delete, or re-create nodes, or run any other command that changes the cluster.
Give the user any fix to apply themselves.
When you recommend a fix, link the doc section that describes it.
Analyzer routing overview
By default, Workload Monitoring treats a 15% drop in TPU duty cycle as a
performance degradation, raises a MonitoredEvent (type: PERFORMANCE_DEGRADATION), and runs its analyzers. Consult the
Workload Monitoring and analyzers
section in the official Cloud TPU documentation for the complete analyzer
definitions, detection criteria, and subsections, and route remediation by
category:
- Category A: workload resource bottlenecks (never cordon or replace nodes):
- Category B: infrastructure and network fabric throttling (culprit nodes):
- Category C:
PERFORMANCE_DEGRADATION event fired, but no analyzer reports
detectionState: "DETECTED":
Diagnostic workflow
Step 0: Collect context and set the investigation window [Low Risk]
Collect the target parameters. By default, query a 60-minute window `[T - 30m, T
{project_id}: Google Cloud project ID
{location}: Google Cloud region where the ML run and GKE cluster reside (for
example, us-central1)
{cluster_name}: GKE cluster name
{workload_name} / {ml_run_id}: JobSet / workload name or ML Diagnostics
run ID
{issue_time}: Timestamp when throughput degradation was observed (T,
ISO-8601 UTC)
{start_time}: T - 30m
{end_time}: T + 30m
Step 1: Query ML runs and monitoredEvents [Low Risk]
- List active or recent ML runs: Give the user
gcloud alpha mldiagnostics machine-learning-run list with a link to
List machine learning runs
in the ML Diagnostics CLI reference, and locate {ml_run_id} matching
{workload_name}.
- List performance degradation events: Give the user
gcloud alpha mldiagnostics monitored-events list with a link to
Monitored-events commands,
or the hypercomputecluster.googleapis.com/v1alpha API with a link to
Access Workload Monitoring information through the API,
to check for PERFORMANCE_DEGRADATION events during [{start_time}, {end_time}].
- Describe the
MonitoredEvent: Give the user gcloud alpha mldiagnostics monitored-events describe with a link to the same
Monitored-events commands
section, and inspect the analyzerReports array (analyzer,
detectionState, details, and recommendedActions).
- If a
PERFORMANCE_DEGRADATION event fired, run Step 2 to corroborate with
the 1-minute system metrics; if none of its analyzerReports entries has
detectionState: "DETECTED", follow
Path C: Event fired with no DETECTED analyzer.
- If no
PERFORMANCE_DEGRADATION event exists and duty cycle is steady in
Step 2, rule out TPU performance degradation by following
Path D: Healthy telemetry.
Step 2: Correlate with 1-minute Cloud Monitoring system metrics [Low Risk]
Consult the
System Metrics
section in the Workload Monitoring documentation for the 1-minute Cloud
Monitoring metrics exported for TPU and host devices, and run read-only PromQL
queries over [{start_time}, {end_time}] to corroborate the analyzer report:
# 1. Node TPU duty cycle (look for the drop on the affected nodes)
kubernetes_io:node_accelerator_duty_cycle{
monitored_resource="k8s_node",
project_id="{project_id}",
cluster_name="{cluster_name}"
}
# 2. HBM utilization ratio by node (around 0.90 is approaching the limit)
sum by (node_name) (
kubernetes_io:node_accelerator_memory_used{
monitored_resource="k8s_node",
project_id="{project_id}",
cluster_name="{cluster_name}"
}
)
/
sum by (node_name) (
kubernetes_io:node_accelerator_memory_total{
monitored_resource="k8s_node",
project_id="{project_id}",
cluster_name="{cluster_name}"
}
)
# 3. Host memory and CPU allocatable utilization
kubernetes_io:node_memory_allocatable_utilization{
monitored_resource="k8s_node",
project_id="{project_id}",
cluster_name="{cluster_name}"
}
kubernetes_io:node_cpu_allocatable_utilization{
monitored_resource="k8s_node",
project_id="{project_id}",
cluster_name="{cluster_name}"
}
Step 3: Map culprit instance IDs to GKE nodes and topology [Low Risk]
When an infrastructure analyzer reports culprit numeric Compute Engine instance
IDs in details or recommendedActions, map those numeric instance IDs to GKE
Node names and physical topology blocks using this read-only kubectl query
inspecting container.googleapis.com/instance_id:
kubectl get nodes -l cloud.google.com/gke-tpu-accelerator \
-o jsonpath='{range .items[*]}{.metadata.name}{"\tinstance_id="}{.metadata.annotations.container\.googleapis\.com/instance_id}{"\tblock="}{.metadata.labels.cloud\.google\.com/gce-topology-block}{"\tsubblock="}{.metadata.labels.cloud\.google\.com/gce-topology-subblock}{"\thost="}{.metadata.labels.cloud\.google\.com/gce-topology-host}{"\n"}{end}'
Step 4: Remediation by analyzer category
Load and follow only the reference file that matches the analyzer category from
Step 1:
Guardrails
- Never change GKE-managed instance groups or VMs through Compute Engine:
Don't run
gcloud compute instance-groups managed commands, such as
delete, on a node pool's managed instance group. Handle nodes through GKE,
as described in
Path B: Infrastructure or network fabric throttling.
- Never cordon nodes for workload resource saturation: If only the HBM
capacity, host memory, or host CPU utilization analyzers detected an issue,
don't cordon or replace nodes.