本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

aeo

Check and improve your brand's visibility across AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Claude, DeepSeek). Set up tracking, run visibility analyses, audit your website for AI readability, and get actionable recommendations. Uses the npx goose-aeo@latest CLI.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md9.5 KB
  • skill.meta.json224 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

You are helping a user check and improve their brand's Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) — how visible they are across AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Claude, and DeepSeek.

You use the npx goose-aeo@latest CLI to do everything. Always use --json for machine-readable output — never rely on interactive prompts.

Auto-Detect: What Does the User Need?

Before doing anything, check the current state:

cat .goose-aeo.yml 2>/dev/null || echo "NOT_FOUND"

Then route based on state and what the user asked:

StateUser saysAction
No .goose-aeo.ymlAnything AEO-relatedStart with Setup
Config exists, no runs"run", "check", "analyze"Go to Run Analysis
Config exists, has runs"run", "check"Go to Run Analysis
Config exists, has runs"audit", "score my site"Go to Website Audit
Config exists, has runs"recommend", "what should I do"Go to Recommendations
Config exists, has runsGeneral AEO requestShow status summary, offer all options

If in doubt, run npx goose-aeo@latest status --json to see the full picture (company name, query count, previous runs) and ask the user what they'd like to do.


Setup

Set up AEO tracking for a domain. Have a natural conversation with the user to gather what's needed.

Gather Information

Ask the user for:

  • Company domain (e.g., athina.ai) — required
  • Company name (e.g., "Athina AI") — if not provided, derive from domain
  • A few competitors — ask "Who are your main competitors?" If they're not sure, say you'll auto-discover them.
  • Which AI engines to monitor — default is Perplexity, OpenAI, and Gemini. Ask if they want to add Grok, Claude, or DeepSeek. More providers = higher cost per run.

Do NOT proceed until you have at least the company domain.

Check Prerequisites

Check which API keys are available:

node -e "
const keys = {
  GOOSE_AEO_PERPLEXITY_API_KEY: !!process.env.GOOSE_AEO_PERPLEXITY_API_KEY,
  GOOSE_AEO_OPENAI_API_KEY: !!process.env.GOOSE_AEO_OPENAI_API_KEY,
  GOOSE_AEO_GEMINI_API_KEY: !!process.env.GOOSE_AEO_GEMINI_API_KEY,
  GOOSE_AEO_GROK_API_KEY: !!process.env.GOOSE_AEO_GROK_API_KEY,
  GOOSE_AEO_CLAUDE_API_KEY: !!process.env.GOOSE_AEO_CLAUDE_API_KEY,
  GOOSE_AEO_DEEPSEEK_API_KEY: !!process.env.GOOSE_AEO_DEEPSEEK_API_KEY,
  GOOSE_AEO_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY: !!process.env.GOOSE_AEO_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY,
};
console.log(JSON.stringify(keys, null, 2));
"

Tell the user which keys are set and which are missing for their chosen providers. If keys are missing, ask them to provide the values. When they do, write them to .env:

echo 'GOOSE_AEO_PERPLEXITY_API_KEY=pplx-...' >> .env

The GOOSE_AEO_OPENAI_API_KEY is also needed for query generation and analysis (not just as a monitored provider). Make sure the user knows this.

Run Init

Build the flags from what the user told you:

npx goose-aeo@latest init \
  --domain <domain> \
  --name "<company name>" \
  --providers <comma-separated-providers> \
  --competitors "<comma-separated-competitor-domains>" \
  --json

If the user didn't provide competitors, the tool will auto-discover them using Perplexity (if the API key is set).

Show the user the competitors and providers configured. Ask: "Do these competitors look right? Want to add or remove any?"

If the user wants changes, edit .goose-aeo.yml directly — do NOT re-run init.

Generate Queries

Generate a small batch for review:

npx goose-aeo@latest queries generate --limit 10 --dry-run --json

Show the queries in a readable numbered list. Ask: "Do these look like the kind of things your potential customers would search for?"

If queries are off-topic, update the company description in .goose-aeo.yml and re-generate. To add specific queries: npx goose-aeo@latest queries add "<query text>" --json. To remove: npx goose-aeo@latest queries remove <id> --json.

Once approved, generate the full set:

npx goose-aeo@latest queries generate --limit 50 --json

Hand Off

Tell the user setup is complete and offer to run their first analysis right away. Mention approximate cost: 50 queries x 3 providers ~ $2-5 per run.


Run Analysis

Execute queries against AI search engines and generate a visibility report.

Pre-Flight

npx goose-aeo@latest status --json

Show: company name, number of queries, number of previous runs.

Cost Estimate

npx goose-aeo@latest run --dry-run --json

Tell the user: number of queries, which providers, total API calls, estimated cost. Ask for confirmation before proceeding.

Execute

npx goose-aeo@latest run --confirm --json

This may take several minutes. Tell the user it's running.

Analyze

npx goose-aeo@latest analyze --json

Note how many responses were analyzed, analysis cost, and any alerts from metric drops.

Report

npx goose-aeo@latest report --json

Present a conversational summary — do NOT dump raw numbers:

  • Overall visibility: mention rate, prominence score, share of voice
  • By provider: mention rate per engine
  • Key insights: best/worst provider, competitor comparison, any alerts
  • Recommendations: 2-3 actionable suggestions based on results

Next Steps

Offer:

  1. "See the dashboard" — npx goose-aeo@latest dashboard
  2. "Audit my website" — run a website readability audit
  3. "Get recommendations" — detailed improvement recommendations
  4. "Compare with previous run" — if 2+ runs exist, run a diff

Website Audit

Scrape website pages and score each for AI search readability across 6 dimensions.

Pre-Flight

npx goose-aeo@latest status --json

If not set up, direct the user to setup first.

Run Audit

npx goose-aeo@latest audit --json

This may take a minute or two as it scrapes pages and scores each one.

Present Results

Overall score: "Your site scores X.X / 10 for AI search readability"

  • = 7: well-optimized

  • 4-7: room for improvement
  • < 4: needs significant work

Per-page highlights: Best and worst scoring pages.

Dimension breakdown — explain which are strongest and weakest:

  • Positioning Clarity: Does your site clearly explain what you do upfront?
  • Structured Content: Do pages use headings, lists, FAQs that AI can parse?
  • Query Alignment: Does your content match what people ask AI engines?
  • Technical Signals: Schema markup, meta descriptions, clean HTML?
  • Content Depth: Enough detail for AI to form a meaningful citation?
  • Comparison Content: Do you compare yourself to alternatives?

Recommendations: Present as numbered actionable items.

Offer to Fix

Based on lowest-scoring dimensions, offer specific actions:

  • Low structuredContent: "Want me to add FAQ sections to your key pages?"
  • Low comparisonContent: "Want me to create a comparison page?"
  • Low queryAlignment: "Want me to create content pages that answer your tracked queries?"
  • Low technicalSignals: "Want me to improve meta descriptions and add schema markup?"
  • Low positioningClarity: "Want me to rewrite your homepage intro?"
  • Low contentDepth: "Want me to expand content on your thinnest pages?"

Recommendations

Analyze latest run data and produce actionable visibility improvement recommendations.

Pre-Flight

npx goose-aeo@latest status --json

If no runs exist, tell the user to run an analysis first.

Generate

npx goose-aeo@latest recommend --json

Present Results

Overall summary: Big picture of the brand's AI visibility position.

Visibility gaps: For each gap — the topic, affected queries, which competitors are mentioned instead, and the specific recommendation.

Source opportunities: Domains frequently cited by AI engines, how often, and how to get featured there.

Competitor insights: Who's outperforming, on which queries, and what they might be doing differently.

Offer Next Steps

  1. "Draft content for gaps" — create blog posts, landing pages, or FAQ content for visibility gaps
  2. "Create a comparison page" — draft a vs/comparison page if competitors are being mentioned instead
  3. "Write a guest post pitch" — draft outreach for source opportunity domains
  4. "Update queries" — add new query angles the recommendations suggest
  5. "See the dashboard" — npx goose-aeo@latest dashboard for visual exploration

Error Handling

  • "No company found" / no .goose-aeo.yml: Run setup first.
  • "GOOSE_AEO_OPENAI_API_KEY is required": Tell the user to set the env var — it's needed for query generation, analysis, and recommendations.
  • Provider API key missing: Tell the user which key is needed and how to set it.
  • No pages scraped during audit: Check the domain in .goose-aeo.yml and whether the site is publicly accessible.
  • All-zero visibility: Explain this means AI engines aren't mentioning the brand yet — this is the baseline to improve from.
  • Partial run failure: Some providers may have succeeded. Check error count and report which failed.
  • Never silently swallow errors — always show them and suggest a fix.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Turn a brand's facts, a campaign brief and the product into a one-minute Meta ad strategy with its reasoning — goal, audience, objective and placements, budget split, how many ads and how different they must be (generate 3x so the user can choose), the test frame, the success metric, and safety rules for the user to accept. Decides what launch-meta-ad-campaign then executes, and re-reads the strategy after a deep check to show which assumption changed. Use it after intake and before any creative is generated or any campaign is built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

gooseworks-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する