本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

kol-content-monitor

Track what key opinion leaders (KOLs) in your space are posting on LinkedIn and Twitter/X. Surfaces trending narratives, high-engagement topics, and early signals of emerging conversations before they peak. Chains linkedin-profile-post-scraper and twitter-mention-tracker. Use when a marketing team wants to ride trends rather than create them from scratch, or when a founder wants to know which topics are resonating with their audience.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB
  • skill.meta.json377 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

KOL Content Monitor

Track what Key Opinion Leaders in your space are writing about. Surface trending narratives early — before they peak — so your team can join the conversation at the right time with relevant content.

Core principle: For seed-stage teams, the fastest path to content distribution is riding a wave that's already breaking, not creating one from scratch.

When to Use

  • "What are the top voices in [our space] posting about?"
  • "What topics are trending on LinkedIn in [industry]?"
  • "I want to know what content is resonating before I write anything"
  • "Track [list of founders/experts] and tell me what they're saying"
  • "Find trending narratives I can contribute to"

Phase 0: Intake

KOL List

  1. Names and LinkedIn URLs of KOLs to track (if known)
    • If unknown: use kol-discovery skill first to build the list
  2. Twitter/X handles for the same KOLs (optional but recommended for full picture)
  3. Any specific topics/keywords you care about? (for filtering noisy feeds)

Scope

  1. How far back? (default: 7 days for weekly monitor, 30 days for first run)
  2. Minimum engagement threshold to include a post? (default: 20 reactions/likes)

Save config to the current working directory as kol-monitor.json (or user-specified path).

{
  "kols": [
    {
      "name": "Lenny Rachitsky",
      "linkedin": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/lennyrachitsky/",
      "twitter": "@lennysan"
    },
    {
      "name": "Kyle Poyar",
      "linkedin": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/kylepoyar/",
      "twitter": "@kylepoyar"
    }
  ],
  "days_back": 7,
  "min_reactions": 20,
  "keywords": ["GTM", "growth", "AI", "outbound", "founder"],
  "output_path": "kol-monitor-[DATE].md"
}

Phase 1: Scrape LinkedIn Posts

Run linkedin-profile-post-scraper for all KOL LinkedIn profiles:

python3 skills/linkedin-profile-post-scraper/scripts/scrape_linkedin_posts.py \
  --profiles "<url1>,<url2>,<url3>" \
  --days <days_back> \
  --max-posts 20 \
  --output json

Filter results: only include posts with reactions ≥ min_reactions.

Phase 2: Scrape Twitter/X Posts

Run twitter-mention-tracker for each handle:

python3 skills/twitter-mention-tracker/scripts/search_twitter.py \
  --query "from:<handle>" \
  --since <YYYY-MM-DD> \
  --until <YYYY-MM-DD> \
  --max-tweets 20 \
  --output json

Filter: only include tweets with likes ≥ min_reactions / 2 (Twitter engagement is lower than LinkedIn).

Phase 3: Topic Clustering

Group all posts across all KOLs by topic/theme:

Clustering approach:

  1. Extract the main topic from each post (1-3 word label)
  2. Group similar topics together
  3. Count: how many KOLs touched this topic? How many total posts?
  4. Rank by: total engagement (sum of reactions/likes across all posts on that topic)

This surfaces topics with broad consensus (multiple KOLs talking about it) vs. individual takes.

Signal types to flag:

SignalMeaningExample
Convergence3+ KOLs on same topic in same weekMultiple founders posting about "AI SDR fatigue"
SpikeTopic that 2x'd in volume vs last weekSuddenly everyone's talking about [new thing]
Underdog1 KOL posting about topic nobody else coversPotential early-mover opportunity
ControversyPosts with high comment/reaction ratioDebate you could weigh in on

Phase 4: Output Format

# KOL Content Monitor — Week of [DATE]

## Tracked KOLs
[N] KOLs | [N] LinkedIn posts | [N] tweets | Period: [date range]

---

## Trending Topics This Week

### 1. [Topic Name] — CONVERGENCE SIGNAL
- **KOLs discussing:** [Name 1], [Name 2], [Name 3]
- **Total posts:** [N] | **Total engagement:** [N] reactions/likes
- **Trend direction:** ↑ New this week / ↑↑ Growing / → Stable

**Best posts on this topic:**

> "[Post excerpt — first 150 chars]"
— [Author], [Date] | [N] reactions
[LinkedIn URL]

> "[Tweet text]"
— [@handle], [Date] | [N] likes
[Twitter URL]

**Content opportunity:** [1-2 sentences on how to contribute to this conversation]

---

### 2. [Topic Name]
...

---

## High-Engagement Posts (Top 5 This Week)

| Post | Author | Platform | Engagement | Topic |
|------|--------|----------|------------|-------|
| "[Preview...]" | [Name] | LinkedIn | [N] reactions | [topic] |
...

---

## Emerging Topics to Watch

Topics picked up by 1 KOL this week — too early to call a trend but worth tracking:
- [Topic] — [KOL name] — [brief description]
- [Topic] — ...

---

## Recommended Content Actions

### This Week (Ride the Wave)
1. **[Topic]** is peaking — ideal moment to publish your take. Suggested angle: [angle]
2. **[Controversy]** is generating debate — consider a nuanced response post. Your positioning: [suggestion]

### Next Week (Get Ahead)
1. **[Emerging topic]** is early-stage — write something now before it gets crowded.

Save to the current working directory as kol-monitor-[YYYY-MM-DD].md (or user-specified path).

Phase 5: Build Trigger-Based Content Calendar

Optional: from the monitor output, propose a content calendar entry for each "Ride the Wave" opportunity:

Topic: [topic]
Best post format: [LinkedIn insight post / tweet thread / blog]
Suggested hook: [hook]
Supporting points: [3 bullets from your product/experience]
Ideal publish date: [within 3 days of peak]

Scheduling

Run weekly (Friday afternoon — catches the week's peaks and gives weekend to draft):

0 14 * * 5 python3 run_skill.py kol-content-monitor --client <client-name>

Cost

ComponentCost
LinkedIn post scraping (per profile)~$0.05-0.20 (Apify)
Twitter scraping (per run)~$0.01-0.05
Total per weekly run (10 KOLs)~$0.50-2.00

Tools Required

  • Apify API token — APIFY_API_TOKEN env var
  • Upstream skills: linkedin-profile-post-scraper, twitter-mention-tracker
  • Optional upstream: kol-discovery (to build initial KOL list)

Trigger Phrases

  • "What are the top voices in [space] posting about this week?"
  • "Track my KOL list and give me content ideas"
  • "Run KOL content monitor for [client]"
  • "What's trending on LinkedIn in [industry]?"

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Turn a brand's facts, a campaign brief and the product into a one-minute Meta ad strategy with its reasoning — goal, audience, objective and placements, budget split, how many ads and how different they must be (generate 3x so the user can choose), the test frame, the success metric, and safety rules for the user to accept. Decides what launch-meta-ad-campaign then executes, and re-reads the strategy after a deep check to show which assumption changed. Use it after intake and before any creative is generated or any campaign is built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

gooseworks-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する