本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

launch-positioning-builder

Research competitors, analyze their messaging, and generate a positioning document with category definition, differentiation claims, value propositions, and proof points. Chains web research, competitor site analysis, and review mining to produce a positioning doc ready for website copy and sales deck use. Use when a product marketing team needs to define or refresh positioning ahead of a launch, rebrand, or competitive shift.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md8.3 KB
  • skill.meta.json324 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Launch Positioning Builder

Research the competitive landscape and produce a complete positioning document — category definition, differentiation claims, value props, proof points, and messaging hierarchy. Output is directly usable in website copy, sales decks, and investor materials.

Built for: First PMM hire at a seed/Series A startup, or a founder wearing the product marketing hat. The output should be opinionated, not a generic template.

When to Use

  • "Help me position [product] against [competitors]"
  • "We need a positioning doc before our launch"
  • "How should we differentiate from [competitor]?"
  • "Rewrite our positioning — it's too generic"
  • "What category should we create or own?"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Product name + URL — What are you positioning?
  2. One-sentence pitch — How do you describe what you do today?
  3. Top 2-3 competitors — Names + URLs. Who does your buyer compare you to?
  4. ICP — Title, company type, stage (e.g., "Head of Growth at Series A B2B SaaS")
  5. Key differentiators — What do you believe makes you different? (even if not yet articulated)
  6. Existing proof points — Customer wins, metrics, logos, quotes (anything you have)
  7. Positioning trigger — Why now? (new launch, competitive pressure, rebrand, entering new segment)

Phase 1: Competitive Landscape Research

1A: Competitor Website Analysis

For each competitor, research and extract:

Search: "[competitor name]" site:[competitor-url]
Search: "[competitor name]" positioning OR "we help" OR "the only"
Fetch: competitor homepage, pricing page, about page

Extract from each competitor:

  • Tagline / hero copy — their primary claim
  • Category language — what category do they put themselves in?
  • Key differentiators — what do they emphasize?
  • Proof points — customer logos, metrics, case studies
  • Pricing model — free trial, freemium, enterprise, usage-based
  • Target audience language — who do they say they serve?

1B: Review Mining (if available)

If competitors have G2/Capterra reviews, scan for:

  • What customers praise (their perceived strengths)
  • What customers complain about (your potential wedge)
  • How customers describe the category

1C: Ad Copy Analysis (optional)

Search for competitor ad copy:

Search: "[competitor name]" advertisement OR "sponsored"

Ad copy reveals what competitors believe converts — their sharpest positioning.

Phase 2: Positioning Framework

Build the positioning doc using April Dunford's framework adapted for early-stage:

2A: Category Definition

ApproachWhen to UseExample
Existing categoryYou compete head-to-head"CRM for startups"
SubcategoryYou serve a niche better"AI-native sales engagement"
New categoryYou do something genuinely different"Revenue orchestration platform"

Decision criteria:

  • If your ICP already searches for the category → use existing or subcategory
  • If you'd spend 50% of sales calls explaining the category → don't create a new one
  • If no existing category captures what you do → create one, but keep it intuitive

2B: Competitive Alternatives

What would your customer do if you didn't exist?

  • Direct competitors (same category)
  • Adjacent tools (partial overlap)
  • Manual process (spreadsheets, hiring, doing nothing)

2C: Unique Attributes → Value Props

Map each differentiator to a customer value:

Unique AttributeValue to CustomerProof Point
[What you have][Why they care][Evidence]
[What you have][Why they care][Evidence]

2D: Messaging Hierarchy

LevelMessageUse Where
Positioning statementFor [ICP] who [pain], [Product] is the [category] that [key differentiator]. Unlike [alternative], we [unique value].Internal alignment, PR
Primary headline[Outcome-driven claim]Homepage hero, ads
Supporting messages (3)[Value prop 1], [Value prop 2], [Value prop 3]Feature sections, sales deck
Proof line[Metric or customer quote]Below the fold, case studies

Phase 3: Competitive Positioning Map

Create a 2x2 positioning matrix:

                    [Dimension A: e.g., Ease of Use]
                    High
                      |
         [You]        |       [Competitor A]
                      |
    ──────────────────┼──────────────────
                      |
      [Competitor C]  |       [Competitor B]
                      |
                    Low
        Low ──────────────────────── High
                    [Dimension B: e.g., Enterprise-readiness]

Choose dimensions where you win on at least one axis. Avoid dimensions where you lose on both.

Phase 4: Output Format

# Positioning Document — [Product Name]
Created: [DATE] | Trigger: [launch/rebrand/competitive shift]

---

## Positioning Statement

For [ICP] who [pain point],
[Product] is the [category]
that [key differentiator].
Unlike [primary alternative],
we [unique value that matters to ICP].

---

## Category

**Category:** [name]
**Approach:** [Existing / Subcategory / New]
**Rationale:** [1-2 sentences on why this framing]

---

## Competitive Landscape

### Direct Competitors
| Competitor | Positioning | Strength | Weakness (your wedge) |
|-----------|-------------|----------|----------------------|
| [Name] | "[Their tagline]" | [What they do well] | [Where they fall short] |

### Alternative Solutions
- [Manual process / spreadsheet / hiring]
- [Adjacent tool category]

---

## Value Propositions

### Primary: [Headline claim]
[2-sentence explanation + proof point]

### Secondary A: [Value prop]
[2-sentence explanation + proof point]

### Secondary B: [Value prop]
[2-sentence explanation + proof point]

---

## Proof Points Library

### With Metrics
- "[Customer quote with number]" — [Source]
- [Metric]: [claim] — [evidence]

### Logos & Social Proof
- [Customer logos to feature]
- [Review platform ratings]

---

## Messaging by Audience

### [Persona 1: e.g., Founder/CEO]
- **Pain:** [What keeps them up at night]
- **Hook:** "[Message that resonates]"
- **Proof:** [Evidence they'd trust]

### [Persona 2: e.g., Head of Growth]
- **Pain:** ...
- **Hook:** ...
- **Proof:** ...

---

## Positioning Map

[2x2 matrix with chosen dimensions]

---

## Where to Deploy This Positioning

| Asset | Key Message | Priority |
|-------|------------|----------|
| Homepage hero | [Primary headline] | P0 — update now |
| Sales deck slide 2-3 | [Positioning statement] | P0 |
| LinkedIn company tagline | [One-liner] | P1 |
| Cold email opening line | [Pain hook] | P1 |
| G2 profile description | [Category + differentiator] | P2 |

---

## What We're NOT Saying

(Guardrails to keep messaging consistent)
- We don't claim to be [X] — that's [competitor]'s territory
- We don't target [segment] — outside our ICP
- We avoid the word "[buzzword]" — overused, means nothing

Save to the current working directory as positioning-[YYYY-MM-DD].md (or user-specified path).

Cost

ComponentCost
Web research (competitor sites)Free
Review mining (if using review-site-scraper)~$0.50-1.00
All analysis and positioningFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree — $1

Tools Required

  • web_search — for competitor research
  • fetch_webpage — for analyzing competitor sites
  • Optional: review-site-scraper for review-based insights

Trigger Phrases

  • "Build a positioning doc for [product]"
  • "How should we position against [competitor]?"
  • "We need positioning before our launch"
  • "Run the positioning builder for [client]"

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Turn a brand's facts, a campaign brief and the product into a one-minute Meta ad strategy with its reasoning — goal, audience, objective and placements, budget split, how many ads and how different they must be (generate 3x so the user can choose), the test frame, the success metric, and safety rules for the user to accept. Decides what launch-meta-ad-campaign then executes, and re-reads the strategy after a deep check to show which assumption changed. Use it after intake and before any creative is generated or any campaign is built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

gooseworks-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する