本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

review-intelligence-digest

Scrape G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot reviews for your product and competitors, then extract recurring themes, objections, proof points, and exact customer language for use in messaging. Chains review-site-scraper with LLM analysis. Produces a weekly or monthly digest that feeds directly into copywriting, positioning, and sales enablement. Use when a marketing team needs to ground messaging in real customer language.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB
  • skill.meta.json327 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Review Intelligence Digest

Scrape reviews for your product and top competitors, then extract what actually matters for marketing: the exact language customers use, recurring pain points, proof points that convert, and objections to pre-empt.

Core principle: Your best marketing copy is already written — by your customers, in their reviews. This skill surfaces it.

When to Use

  • "What are customers saying about us vs competitors?"
  • "Find proof points and objections from our G2 reviews"
  • "What language do our customers use to describe the problem we solve?"
  • "Run a review audit for [client]"
  • "What are [competitor]'s customers complaining about?"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Your product name + review page URLs (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot — any/all)
  2. Competitor names + their review page URLs (1-3 competitors recommended)
  3. What are you trying to learn? (Pick primary focus or do all):
    • Messaging mining — extract ICP language and proof points
    • Competitive displacement — find competitor pain points to exploit
    • Objection mapping — identify what's stopping people from buying/staying
    • Feature gaps — what do customers wish existed?
  4. Time range: last 3 months (default), last 6 months, or all time?

Phase 1: Scrape Reviews

Run review-site-scraper for your product and each competitor:

# Your product
python3 skills/capabilities/review-site-scraper/scripts/scrape_reviews.py \
  --platform g2 \
  --url "<your_g2_url>" \
  --days 90 \
  --output json

# Competitor
python3 skills/capabilities/review-site-scraper/scripts/scrape_reviews.py \
  --platform g2 \
  --url "<competitor_g2_url>" \
  --days 90 \
  --output json

Repeat for Capterra and Trustpilot as needed.

Collect for each review: rating (1-5), title, body text, pros, cons, reviewer role/company (if available), date.

Phase 2: Categorize & Cluster

Analyze all reviews through these five lenses:

Lens 1: Proof Points (5-star reviews)

Extract specific outcomes and metrics customers mention:

  • Time saved / speed improvements
  • Revenue or pipeline impact
  • Headcount equivalent replaced
  • Process improvements
  • Before/after comparisons

Flag reviews with numbers — these are the highest-value proof points.

Lens 2: Core Pain Language

What words and phrases do customers use to describe the problem they had before using the product? This is gold for cold email hooks and ad copy.

Patterns to extract:

  • "Before [product], we were..."
  • "We used to [manual process]..."
  • "The biggest frustration was..."
  • "We couldn't [thing] until..."

Lens 3: Objection Mapping (3-4 star reviews, negative cons)

What do customers wish was different? What almost stopped them from buying?

  • Price/value concerns
  • Onboarding friction
  • Missing features
  • Integration issues
  • Support quality

Group by theme. Count frequency.

Lens 4: Competitive Displacement Signals (competitor reviews)

In competitor reviews, look for:

  • Specific pain points your product doesn't have
  • Features they're missing that you offer
  • Complaints about price, support, or reliability
  • Mentions of switching ("we switched to X")

These are your competitive displacement angles.

Lens 5: Buyer Language Patterns

How do customers categorize and search for your type of product?

  • What category words do they use?
  • What comparison phrases appear? (e.g., "compared to Salesforce", "vs HubSpot")
  • What role/title wrote the reviews? (validates ICP)

Phase 3: Output Format

# Review Intelligence Digest — [DATE]
Products analyzed: [your product], [competitors]
Reviews analyzed: [N] total | Period: [date range]

---

## Proof Points Library (use in copy directly)

### With Metrics (highest value)
- "[Exact quote with number]" — [Reviewer role], [Platform], [Date]
- "[Exact quote with number]" — ...

### Process/Experience Wins
- "[Exact quote]" — [Reviewer role], [Platform]
- ...

---

## Customer Pain Language

Words and phrases customers use to describe the problem you solve:

**Verbatim phrases (use in hooks and subject lines):**
- "[Exact phrase]" (appeared in [N] reviews)
- "[Exact phrase]" (appeared in [N] reviews)
- ...

**Paraphrased themes:**
1. [Theme] — [N] reviews mention this | Example: "[quote]"
2. [Theme] — ...

---

## Objection Map

| Objection | Frequency | Verbatim example | How to address |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|----------------|
| [Objection] | [N] reviews | "[quote]" | [suggested response] |
| ... | | | |

---

## Competitive Displacement Intel

### [Competitor Name]

**Top complaints (use as outreach hooks):**
1. [Complaint] — "[Verbatim quote]" | Appeared [N] times
2. ...

**What their customers want that we offer:**
- [Feature/capability] — "[review evidence]"

**Suggested displacement angle:**
> "[Pitch sentence targeting their unhappy customers]"

---

## SEO / Messaging Vocabulary

Words and phrases to incorporate in website copy, ads, and content:

**High-frequency ICP vocabulary:**
- "[word/phrase]" — used in [N] reviews
- ...

**Category comparison terms:**
- Customers compare you to: [list]
- Customers search for: [list]

---

## Recommended Actions

### Immediate (use this week)
1. Add "[proof point quote]" to homepage or outbound sequences
2. Address "[top objection]" in onboarding flow or sales deck
3. Use "[pain phrase]" as hook in next cold email batch

### Strategic
1. [Feature gap mentioned in reviews — prioritize or address in messaging]
2. [Competitive weakness to build a campaign around]

Save to review-digest-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory.

Scheduling

Run monthly (reviews don't change fast enough to warrant weekly):

0 8 1 * * python3 run_skill.py review-intelligence-digest --client <client-name>

Cost

ComponentCost
G2 reviews (per product)Free tier available (Apify)
Capterra reviews (per product)~$0.20-0.50 (Apify, pay-per-result)
Trustpilot reviews (per product)~$0.20/1k reviews
Total per monthly run (you + 2 competitors)~$1-3

Tools Required

  • Apify API token — APIFY_API_TOKEN env var
  • Upstream skill: review-site-scraper

Trigger Phrases

  • "Mine our reviews for proof points and messaging"
  • "What are [competitor]'s customers complaining about?"
  • "Run review intelligence for [client]"
  • "Give me customer language I can use in copy"

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

Turn a brand's facts, a campaign brief and the product into a one-minute Meta ad strategy with its reasoning — goal, audience, objective and placements, budget split, how many ads and how different they must be (generate 3x so the user can choose), the test frame, the success metric, and safety rules for the user to accept. Decides what launch-meta-ad-campaign then executes, and re-reads the strategy after a deep check to show which assumption changed. Use it after intake and before any creative is generated or any campaign is built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2452026年10月13日 更新

gooseworks-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する