Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: Racon 1.5+, medaka 2.0+, minimap2 2.26+, bwa 0.7.17+, samtools 1.19+, Polypolish 0.6+, pypolca 0.3+, Pilon 1.24+, Merqury 1.3+, meryl 1.4+.
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- CLI:
<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags
The medaka consensus model matters more than the medaka binary version: the model must match the basecaller + pore chemistry + caller mode + version (-m r1041_e82_400bps_sup_v5.0.0); a mismatched model silently degrades the consensus. List options with medaka tools list_models. medaka's status is a moving target - ONT now steers toward dorado polish and has deprecated medaka's diploid-variant workflow in favour of Clair3; verify current guidance and the medaka_consensus wrapper vs newer subcommands. If code throws an error, introspect the installed tool and adapt rather than retrying.
Assembly Polishing
"Polish my genome assembly" -> Decide whether base-level consensus correction is warranted, then apply a read-type-matched polisher and measure the gain with held-out k-mers - or, for an already-accurate assembly, decline.
- CLI:
racon reads.fq aln.sam draft.fa then medaka_consensus -i reads.fq -d draft.fa -o out -m <model> (ONT); polypolish polish draft.fa f1.sam f2.sam + pypolca run (hybrid/short); merqury.sh reads.meryl asm.fa out (measure QV before/after)
The Single Most Important Modern Insight -- Polishing Is Being Engineered Out, and Reflexive Polishing Does Net Harm
Polishing exists to fix the characteristic error of noisy long reads: indels in homopolymers and low-complexity tracts (the pore/RT stutters on AAAAAA) plus residual substitutions. As read accuracy rose (PacBio HiFi ~Q40-50 reads, ONT R10.4.1 + Dorado sup/duplex), the assembly consensus is already near-perfect, and a mapping-based polisher's read-pileup step injects more errors than it removes. Two load-bearing rules dominate:
- Do NOT polish HiFi assemblies by default. A hifiasm/HiCanu HiFi assembly starts at ~Q40+; mapping-based polishers (Racon, Pilon, GCpp) routinely lower QV and introduce haplotype-switch errors. Only polish HiFi with a tool explicitly built not to overcorrect (NextPolish2, DeepPolisher) and only if Merqury QV says there is a real deficit. For HiFi the burden of proof is on polishing, not against it.
- Measure the gain with reference-free, HELD-OUT Merqury k-mers - never the reads polished with, never BUSCO. A polisher's literal objective is to maximize agreement with its input reads, so scoring it with those same reads is circular and always looks like an improvement. The honest stop signal is a Merqury QV plateau, not a fixed iteration count - and polishing can drive QV down silently. Polish with one platform, evaluate with another (polish with ONT, measure with Illumina k-mers).
Polishing is transitional infrastructure: indispensable in the CLR/early-ONT error era, shrinking toward irrelevance as raw accuracy climbs upstream (better basecalling, hifiasm's own consensus). The skill's job is to say when not to polish as firmly as how to.
Tool Taxonomy
| Tool | Citation | Role | When |
|---|
| Racon | Vaser 2017 Genome Res | POA read-to-assembly consensus; fast workhorse | first-pass ONT/CLR self-polish (1-4 rounds); needs minimap2 SAM/PAF |
| medaka | nanoporetech/medaka (software) | ONT neural-network consensus | one pass after Racon; model MUST match basecaller |
| dorado polish | ONT/dorado (software) | modern ONT consensus, owns basecalling context | the emerging medaka replacement; verify current status |
| Polypolish | Wick & Holt 2022 PLoS Comput Biol | Illumina polish using ALL alignments (bwa mem -a) | repeat-rich long-read assemblies; best-in-class short-read polish |
| pypolca | Bouras 2024 Microb Genom (POLCA: Zimin 2020) | fast Illumina SNP/indel correction | pair with Polypolish (modern bacterial practice) |
| Pilon | Walker 2014 PLoS ONE | all-in-one SNP/indel/local short-read fix | legacy; small genomes only; mismaps in repeats, ~1 GB heap/Mb |
| NextPolish / NextPolish2 | Hu 2020 Bioinformatics / Hu 2024 GPB | iterative LR+SR polish / HiFi repeat+phase-aware | NextPolish2 is the HiFi-safe successor |
| Hapo-G | Aury & Istace 2021 NARGAB | haplotype-aware short-read polish | heterozygous diploids; preserves both alleles |
| ntEdit | Warren 2019 Bioinformatics | Bloom-filter k-mer polish, no mapping | very large (>3 Gb) genomes; scales where alignment can't |
| DeepPolisher | Mastoras 2025 Genome Res | transformer correction (PHARAOH ONT phasing) | HiFi/T2T human; halves errors without overcorrection |
| PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant | Shafin 2021 Nat Methods | haplotype-aware ONT consensus via variant calling | human ONT-only polishing |
| DeepConsensus | Baid 2023 Nat Biotechnol | improves CCS reads UPSTREAM of assembly | NOT a polisher - operates before assembly (common category error) |
Decision Tree by Scenario
| Scenario (data type) | Recommended | Why |
|---|
| PacBio HiFi only | Do NOT polish by default -> check Merqury QV first | already ~Q40-50; Racon/Pilon lower QV + collapse haplotypes |
| HiFi with a real Merqury QV deficit | NextPolish2 or DeepPolisher | repeat/phase-aware; won't overcorrect het sites |
| ONT-only, noisy (R9 / R10 hac) | Racon (1-4 rounds) -> medaka (1 pass), or dorado polish | canonical ONT chain; neural consensus on the ONT error model |
| ONT-only, human/diploid | PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant or DeepPolisher | haplotype-aware; preserves both alleles |
| Long-read draft + Illumina (hybrid) | long-read pass, then Polypolish + pypolca | SR fixes residual homopolymer indels Racon/medaka missed |
| Short-read-only assembly (SPAdes) | usually no polishing needed | Illumina is already ~Q40+; structural sins survive anyway |
| HiFi + Illumina | use Illumina k-mers for evaluation, not correction | Merqury hybrid QV, not a polishing pass |
| Heterozygous / repeat-rich genome | Polypolish (-a), Hapo-G, NextPolish2 - or none | non-haplotype-aware polishers erase het / homogenize paralogs |
| Reads not yet QC'd / wrong basecaller | -> read-qc/quality-reports, -> long-read-sequencing/long-read-alignment | garbage-in or model-mismatch makes polishing worse than skipping |
| Complaint is "fragmented" not "low QV" | -> not polishing (scaffolding/gap-filling) | polishing fixes bases, not contiguity |
| Map reads before polishing | short -> read-alignment/bwa-alignment; long -> long-read-sequencing/long-read-alignment | polishers consume a BAM/SAM/PAF, not raw reads |
The Canonical ONT Chain: Racon -> medaka
Racon does the bulk cheap consensus from the long reads themselves; it is a standalone consensus module and does NOT map - the SAM/PAF is supplied. Re-map every round (1-4 rounds; gains decay fast).
minimap2 -t 16 -ax map-ont draft.fasta reads.fq.gz > aln.sam # map-pb for PacBio CLR
racon -t 16 reads.fq.gz aln.sam draft.fasta > racon1.fasta
# re-map reads to racon1.fasta and repeat for round 2... measure QV each round, stop at plateau
medaka applies an ONT-trained neural model for the final consensus - exactly ONE pass after the Racon rounds (it is not an iterate-many-times tool; running medaka twice is a tell). For medaka mechanics and model tables see long-read-sequencing/medaka-polishing; this skill owns the strategy.
medaka_consensus -i reads.fq.gz -d racon_final.fasta -o medaka_out -t 16 \
-m r1041_e82_400bps_sup_v5.0.0 # model MUST match basecaller+chemistry+caller+version
Recent basecallers embed the model in the FASTQ so medaka auto-selects; if the data was basecalled with an old/unknown caller, pick manually from medaka tools list_models, and treat a stale/deprecated model name as a reason to rebasecall rather than proceed.
Hybrid / Short-Read Polishing: Polypolish + pypolca
Polypolish aligns short reads to all locations (bwa mem -a) so it can disambiguate which repeat copy a read belongs to instead of forcing one placement - this is how it beats Pilon in repeats and why it almost never introduces errors.
bwa index draft.fasta
bwa mem -t 16 -a draft.fasta reads_1.fq.gz > aln_1.sam # -a = ALL alignments (the whole point)
bwa mem -t 16 -a draft.fasta reads_2.fq.gz > aln_2.sam
polypolish filter --in1 aln_1.sam --in2 aln_2.sam --out1 filt_1.sam --out2 filt_2.sam
polypolish polish draft.fasta filt_1.sam filt_2.sam > polypolish.fasta # --careful (v0.6+) for low depth
pypolca run -a polypolish.fasta -1 reads_1.fq.gz -2 reads_2.fq.gz -o pypolca_out -t 16 --careful
Bouras 2024 depth-tiered bacterial recommendation: depth <5x -> Polypolish --careful alone; 5-25x -> Polypolish --careful + pypolca --careful; >25x -> Polypolish (default) + pypolca --careful. Modern bacterial best practice is Polypolish + pypolca, NOT Pilon.
Pilon (Legacy Short-Read)
bwa mem -t 16 draft.fasta r1.fq r2.fq | samtools sort -o frags.bam
samtools index frags.bam
java -Xmx16G -jar pilon.jar --genome draft.fasta --frags frags.bam --output pilon --fix all --changes
--fix modes: snps, indels, bases (=snps+indels), gaps, local, all (default), none. Pilon needs a sorted+indexed BAM (route mapping to read-alignment/bwa-alignment). It is legacy: it uses best-placement alignments so it mismaps in repeats (miscorrects toward paralogs), and its ~1 GB heap per Mb of genome OOMs on large eukaryotes - both reasons Polypolish/pypolca displaced it.
Measuring the Gain: Held-Out Merqury QV
Goal: Decide whether a polish actually helped, without fooling yourself.
Approach: Build a meryl k-mer DB from an independent / different-platform read set (k from Merqury's best_k.sh, not hardcoded), then run Merqury on the pre- and post-polish assemblies and compare QV. A polish that does not raise QV did not help; one that lowers it must be reverted.
K=$(sh $MERQURY/best_k.sh 5000000 | tail -n1 | awk '{print int($1+0.5)}') # K from genome size; round float->int
meryl count k=$K output reads.meryl illumina_reads.fq.gz # eval reads != polishing reads
merqury.sh reads.meryl draft.fasta qv_before # QV of the input
merqury.sh reads.meryl polished.fasta qv_after # QV after polishing
Use a held-out set or a different platform than was polished with (polish with ONT, evaluate with Illumina k-mers); the CHM13 effort triangulated with both HiFi and Illumina k-mers (Mc Cartney 2022). Do NOT use BUSCO as the polishing metric - it measures gene-space completeness and barely moves with the homopolymer-indel QV that polishing changes, so a flat BUSCO masks a silent QV drop. A per-gene internal-stop / frameshift count is a useful secondary readout. See assembly-qc for the full QV/spectra-cn workflow.
Per-Method Failure Modes
medaka run with the wrong basecaller model
Trigger: specifying or defaulting to a model that does not match the actual basecaller+chemistry+version. Mechanism: the network applies corrections calibrated for errors that aren't there and misses the ones that are. Symptom: medaka completes with no warning, but Merqury QV is lower than the input. Fix: let medaka auto-detect from the FASTQ; if manual, derive the model from the real caller and confirm in medaka tools list_models; treat a stale model as a reason to rebasecall.
Polishing a HiFi assembly with a mapping-based polisher
Trigger: running Racon/Pilon/GCpp on a hifiasm assembly. Mechanism: at het sites the pileup mixes both true alleles; the polisher overwrites toward the majority and homogenizes near-identical paralogs. Symptom: lost heterozygosity, haplotype-switch errors, QV unchanged or down. Fix: don't; if Merqury shows a real deficit, use NextPolish2/DeepPolisher only.
Validating with the polishing reads (circularity)
Trigger: measuring QV with the same read set used to polish. Mechanism: the polisher already maximized agreement with those reads. Symptom: every polish "improves QV," monotonically. Fix: evaluate with held-out / different-platform k-mers.
Over-polishing past the plateau
Trigger: "a few more rounds to be safe." Mechanism: once resolvable errors are fixed, extra rounds flip correct bases at het/repeat sites. Symptom: "N changes made" keeps reporting while QV oscillates or falls. Fix: track Merqury QV per round; stop at plateau. Treat a large change count on an accurate assembly as a risk signal, not success.
Pilon mismapping in repeats
Trigger: Pilon on a repeat-rich genome. Mechanism: best-placement alignment forces a read onto one repeat copy; Pilon corrects that copy toward the wrong one. Symptom: repeat copies homogenized, paralog differences erased. Fix: Polypolish (bwa mem -a, uses all alignments).
Treating DeepConsensus as a polisher
Trigger: running DeepConsensus on the assembly. Mechanism: DeepConsensus improves CCS reads upstream, before assembly. Symptom: tool expects subreads/CCS, not a FASTA. Fix: run it in the read-prep stage; for assembly polishing use a post-assembly tool.
Quantitative Thresholds
| Threshold | Source | Rationale |
|---|
| HiFi assembly ~Q40-50 already | HiFi read accuracy | starting point too high for mapping-based polishing to help |
| Racon 1-4 rounds, stop at QV plateau | Vaser 2017 + practice | gains decay after ~1-2; extra rounds flip correct bases |
| medaka exactly 1 pass after Racon | medaka design | trained-model pass, not an iterative tool |
Polypolish --careful <5x; +pypolca 5-25x; default >25x | Bouras 2024 Microb Genom | depth-tiered to avoid false-positive repeat edits |
| QV40 (~1 err/10 kb) "reference-grade"; Q50 (~1/100 kb) modern aspiration; CHM13 ~Q73 | field convention; Mc Cartney 2022 | QV = -10*log10(error rate); report measured QV + method |
Merqury k from best_k.sh (k=21 human-scale) | Rhie 2020 Genome Biol | wrong k silently degrades QV/completeness |
| Pilon ~1 GB heap per Mb of genome | Walker 2014 | OOM risk on large eukaryotes; set -Xmx |
Common Errors
| Error / symptom | Cause | Solution |
|---|
| QV drops after polishing a HiFi assembly | over-polishing an already-accurate assembly | stop; HiFi rarely needs short-read polish |
| medaka output worse than input, no warning | wrong/stale basecaller model | auto-detect or match model exactly; else rebasecall |
| Every polishing round "improves" QV | measured with the polishing reads (circular) | evaluate with held-out / different-platform k-mers |
| Lost heterozygosity / switch errors | non-haplotype-aware polisher on a diploid | Hapo-G / NextPolish2 / Polypolish -a, or skip |
| Repeat copies homogenized | Pilon best-placement mismapping | Polypolish with bwa mem -a |
| Pilon OOM / crash on large genome | ~1 GB/Mb heap blowup | raise -Xmx; prefer Polypolish/ntEdit |
| Polishing didn't fix fragmentation | wrong operation | fragmentation is scaffolding/gap-filling, not polishing |
References
- Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. 2017. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads (Racon). Genome Res 27:737-746.
- Walker BJ, et al. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9:e112963.
- Wick RR, Holt KE. 2022. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol 18:e1009802.
- Zimin AV, Salzberg SL. 2020. The genome polishing tool POLCA makes fast and accurate corrections in genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol 16:e1007981.
- Bouras G, et al. 2024. How low can you go? Short-read polishing of Oxford Nanopore bacterial genome assemblies. Microb Genom 10:001254.
- Hu J, et al. 2020. NextPolish: a fast and efficient genome polishing tool for long-read assembly. Bioinformatics 36:2253-2255.
- Hu J, et al. 2024. NextPolish2: a repeat-aware polishing tool for genome assemblies with HiFi long reads. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 22:qzad009.
- Aury JM, Istace B. 2021. Hapo-G, haplotype-aware polishing of genome assemblies with accurate reads. NAR Genom Bioinform 3:lqab034.
- Warren RL, et al. 2019. ntEdit: scalable genome sequence polishing. Bioinformatics 35:4430-4432.
- Baid G, et al. 2023. DeepConsensus improves the accuracy of sequences with a gap-aware sequence transformer. Nat Biotechnol 41:232-238.
- Shafin K, et al. 2021. Haplotype-aware variant calling with PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant enables high accuracy in nanopore long-reads. Nat Methods 18:1322-1332.
- Mastoras M, et al. 2025. Highly accurate assembly polishing with DeepPolisher. Genome Res 35:1595-1608.
- Rhie A, et al. 2020. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol 21:245.
- Mc Cartney AM, et al. 2022. Chasing perfection: validation and polishing strategies for telomere-to-telomere genome assemblies. Nat Methods 19:687-695.
Related Skills
- long-read-assembly - Produces the contiguous-but-error-prone contigs this skill polishes
- short-read-assembly - Source of Illumina reads for hybrid/short-read polishing
- hifi-assembly - HiFi assemblies that usually should NOT be polished
- assembly-qc - Merqury QV before/after is the polishing stop signal
- read-alignment/bwa-alignment - Map short reads to the draft for Polypolish/Pilon
- long-read-sequencing/long-read-alignment - minimap2 mapping of long reads for Racon
- long-read-sequencing/medaka-polishing - medaka mechanics and model tables; this skill owns the strategy
- workflows/genome-assembly-pipeline - End-to-end QC -> assemble -> polish -> scaffold -> QC