本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

product-experimentation

Design and validate bounded product experiments with falsifiable hypotheses, precommitted thresholds, guardrail metrics, ethical eligibility, and stop rules; use for product hypothesis validation / product experiment design. (triggers: `product hypothesis validation`, `product experiment design`)

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(13)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • evals/evals.json7.3 KB
  • references/citations-and-sources.md2.0 KB
  • references/ethical-and-stop-rules.md3.2 KB
  • references/evidence-mapping.md7.2 KB
  • references/experimentation-protocol.md6.9 KB
  • references/semantic-rubrics.md4.5 KB
  • references/synthetic-authorization-v1.md519 B
  • references/synthetic-authorization-v2.md1.1 KB
  • references/synthetic-lifecycle.json29.3 KB
  • references/synthetic-observations-v1.md569 B
  • references/synthetic-plan-v1.md1.1 KB
  • references/synthetic-plan-v2.md2.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Product Experimentation

Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)

Design and validate product experiments with strict falsifiability, precommitted decision thresholds, guardrail monitoring, and bounded exposure, ensuring honest routing of negative and inconclusive findings.

1. Capability Preflight

Verify installed evidence capabilities before designing or reviewing experiments:

  • Resolve product-evidence from <agent-skill-root>/product-management/product-evidence/SKILL.md (ordinary install), <agent-skill-root>/product-management-product-evidence/SKILL.md (flattened Kiro install), or MCP get_skill("product-management", "product-evidence"). Distinguish an explicitly excluded pack from a missing pack; if host configuration cannot establish which, report unknown.
  • Separately check installed scripts/validate-product-evidence.mjs, its package-local assets/product-evidence.schema.json, and Node >=20. Missing script/schema/runtime blocks validation, not safe proposal drafting. MCP body access is not proof that local executable resources are installed.
  • Missing AUTH/DEC, consent, eligible data, or measurement query/baseline is an authority/data gap, not a runtime failure. Keep the experiment proposed and state the missing input; never simulate validation, install dependencies, or fabricate authorization.

2. Core Protocol

  1. Falsifiable Hypotheses (HYP):
    • Formulate clear predictions, causal mechanisms, target cohorts, and explicit disconfirmation criteria matching normative ledger schema.
  2. Precommitted Success & Failure Thresholds:
    • Establish explicit numeric rules (rules: { success, failure, inconclusive }) before running.
    • Modifying thresholds or moving goalposts after observing interim data is strictly prohibited.
  3. Primary Metric & Guardrails:
    • Designate exactly one primary decision metric (MET ref {id, revision}).
    • Define guardrails (guardrails: [{id, revision}]). An uncontained guardrail breach halts the experiment immediately.
  4. Finite Exposure, Budget, and Duration:
    • Declare strict bounds: bounds: { starts_at, ends_at, budget_cap, currency, exposure_cap, stop_rules }.
    • exposure_cap must be a finite safe integer ($\ge 0$); budget_cap must be an unsigned decimal string.
  5. Ethical Eligibility & Stop Rules:
    • Enforce user consent, non-maleficence, and privacy rules.
    • Pre-commit automated stop rules for severe regressions or ethical breaches.
  6. Authorization & Lifecycle Boundaries:
    • Ledger Eligibility vs Host Authorization: An authorized EXP record in the ledger confirms eligibility, NOT live permission to expose users, spend funds, or mutate production flags. Actual production changes require current authenticated host/operator control.
    • Approver names in JSON metadata never substitute for verified ledger authority (AUTH).
    • Separately retain the frozen experiment plan. Result progression adds MET/SRC evidence and completed EXP.result: { classification, sources, limitations }.
    • Any material change to predictions, telemetry queries, guardrails, budget, or exposure requires a new authorized experiment revision.
  7. Honest Decision Routing (DEC):
    • Supported: Propose investment review (purpose: "investment", outcome: "propose"). Does not auto-authorize build.
    • Refuted: Recommend stopping further work, bounded iteration, or proposal as supported by evidence. For a purpose: "experiment" DEC use only lawful outcomes such as "propose", "defer", or "reject"; "stop" is valid only for purpose: "value_review" when its required strategy, authority, and artifact evidence exists. Otherwise record a proposal and the missing proof; never fabricate a recorded value-review decision.
    • Inconclusive: Defer or bounded further learning (outcome: "defer"). Never treat inconclusive results as validation.
    • Immutable recorded DECs stay current until superseded by a new recorded DEC ID referencing supersedes: {id, revision}.

3. Anti-Patterns & Red Flags

  • No Moving Thresholds: Never lower success bars after seeing weak results.
  • No Unconditional Full Build: Never claim positive prototype testing authorizes full implementation without budget approval.
  • No Ignoring Guardrails: Never celebrate conversion increases if churn or error guardrails are breached.
  • No Fabricated Authorization: Never treat JSON strings or ledger eligibility as live host authorization.
  • No In-Place Decision Mutation: Never edit an already recorded decision in place.

4. References

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Upgrade an Android project to Android Gradle Plugin (AGP) 9. Use when migrating to AGP 9, updating Gradle build files, migrating to built-in Kotlin, or adopting the new AGP DSL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard5772026年10月15日 更新

Apply Clean Architecture layering, modularization, and Unidirectional Data Flow in Android projects. Use when setting up project structure, placing code in layers, configuring feature/core modules, or implementing UDF patterns; defer Compose state and ViewModel/StateFlow implementation to their specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard5772026年10月15日 更新

Implement WorkManager and background processing correctly on Android. Use when creating Worker classes, scheduling tasks, choosing between WorkManager and Foreground Services, or setting up Hilt in workers; defer FCM and notification delivery to android-notifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard5772026年10月15日 更新

Build high-performance declarative UI with Jetpack Compose. Use when writing Composable functions, optimizing recomposition, hoisting state, or working with LazyColumn and side effects; defer deep-link and navigation routing to android-navigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard5772026年10月15日 更新

Migrate an Android XML View to Jetpack Compose following a structured 10-step workflow. Use when converting XML layouts to Compose, setting up Compose in an existing View-based project, or incrementally adopting Compose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard5772026年10月15日 更新

Write correct coroutine scopes, lifecycle collection, and dispatcher injection in Android production code. Use for suspend functions, coroutine scopes, and dispatcher mechanics; defer ViewModel StateFlow/LiveData architecture, Fragment lifecycle recipes, persistence/notifications, and unit-test recipes to their specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard5772026年10月15日 更新

HoangNguyen0403 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する