本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

bio-workflows-metabolomics-pipeline

Orchestrates the untargeted LC-MS metabolomics pipeline end-to-end (xcms 4.x feature extraction, QC/drift/normalization, confidence-stratified annotation, permutation-validated statistics, background-aware pathway mapping), naming what each stage decides and where it silently fails. Use when running a full LC-MS metabolomics study from raw mzML to enriched pathways and needing the honest handoffs between stages. Each stage defers to its component skill for parameters and traps; for stable-isotope flux (a separate branch, not this untargeted flow) see metabolomics/isotope-tracing.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md16.0 KB
  • examples/metabolomics_workflow.R6.1 KB
  • usage-guide.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: xcms 4.x+ (MsExperiment/XcmsExperiment), pmp 1.14+, ropls 1.34+, MetaboAnalystR 4.0+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • R: packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parameters

This pipeline is only as honest as its weakest stage: a flawless feature table fed to a too-flexible drift model, or a clean OPLS-DA plot fed to background-free enrichment, produces confident wrong biology. Validate each stage against its own held-out check (QCs, permutation null, assay-coverage background), not against the next stage looking nice.

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Metabolomics Pipeline

"Process my LC-MS metabolomics data end-to-end" -> Chain xcms feature extraction, QC/normalization, confidence-stratified annotation, validated statistics, and background-aware pathway mapping, treating each stage's output as a hypothesis its component skill scrutinizes.

  • R: readMsExperiment() -> findChromPeaks() -> groupChromPeaks() -> fillChromPeaks() -> featureValues() (xcms), then QCRSC()/pqn_normalisation() (pmp), opls() (ropls), CalculateOraScore()/PerformPSEA() (MetaboAnalystR)

What Each Stage Decides and Where the Traps Are

This skill is an orchestrator: it sequences the five component skills and enforces the honest handoffs between them. It does not re-teach each stage's parameters -- those live in the component SKILLs cited per row.

StageThe decision it ownsThe trap it must not paper overDefers to
1. Feature extractioncentWave/grouping/alignment parameters that set the detection floorA feature table is a parameterized hypothesis; fillChromPeaks fabricates intensities; 1 compound = 5-15 featuresmetabolomics/xcms-preprocessing
2. QC + normalizationdrift correction, RSD/D-ratio filtering, dilution normalization, mechanism-aware imputationOver-correction is invisible to QC RSD; half-min-impute-then-test inflates significance; confounded design is unrescuablemetabolomics/normalization-qc
3. Annotationthe MSI/Schymanski confidence level of every nameA database hit is Level 4-5, not an identification; ambiguous m/z inflates downstream pathwaysmetabolomics/metabolite-annotation
4. Statisticsunivariate FDR + permutation-validated multivariate, reconciledA clean PLS-DA score plot is the generic output of p>>n; R2 is no evidence; scaling changes conclusionsmetabolomics/statistical-analysis
5. Pathway mappingORA on IDs vs mummichog on m/z, with an explicit backgroundThe background IS the null; enrichment launders annotation uncertainty into confident biologymetabolomics/pathway-mapping

Pipeline Flow

raw mzML (centroided)
   |  metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing
   v  readMsExperiment -> findChromPeaks -> adjustRtime -> (re)groupChromPeaks -> fillChromPeaks
features x samples table (+ is_filled flags, mzmed/rtmed)
   |  metabolomics/normalization-qc
   v  blank/detection filter -> within-batch drift (QCRSC) -> RSD/D-ratio filter -> PQN -> mechanism-aware impute
QC-clean, dilution-normalized matrix
   |  split: statistics  AND  annotation (independent axes)
   v
metabolomics/statistical-analysis            metabolomics/metabolite-annotation
permutation-validated hits + univariate FDR  confidence-stratified names (MSI level per feature)
   |                                                |
   +-------------------- join on feature_id --------+
   v  metabolomics/pathway-mapping
identified compounds -> ORA/MSEA   OR   raw m/z (no IDs) -> mummichog/PSEA (background = FULL table)
   v
pathways "consistent with perturbation", conditional on annotations + background

Stable-isotope tracing (flux) is a SEPARATE branch off labeled raw data, not a stage of this untargeted flow -- see metabolomics/isotope-tracing.

Stage 1 -- Feature Extraction (modern xcms 4.x)

Goal: Turn centroided mzML into a features-by-samples table, carrying the parameters as part of the result.

Approach: Use the MsExperiment/XcmsExperiment containers with *Param objects; align to pooled QC, regroup after alignment, and treat filled values as imputations. Full parameter rationale (ppm, peakwidth, bw, prefilter) lives in metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing.

library(xcms)
# pd: data.frame, one row per file, with a sample_group column ('QC'/'Control'/'Treatment')
raw <- readMsExperiment(spectraFiles = mzml_files, sampleData = pd)

cwp <- CentWaveParam(ppm = 10, peakwidth = c(2, 20), snthresh = 10,
                     prefilter = c(3, 1000), noise = 1000)   # set from instrument; see xcms-preprocessing
xdata <- findChromPeaks(raw, param = cwp)
xdata <- adjustRtime(xdata, param = ObiwarpParam(binSize = 0.6))
pdp <- PeakDensityParam(sampleGroups = sampleData(xdata)$sample_group,
                        bw = 5, minFraction = 0.5, binSize = 0.025)
xdata <- groupChromPeaks(xdata, param = pdp)        # regroup on corrected RT
xdata <- fillChromPeaks(xdata, param = ChromPeakAreaParam())

feat <- featureValues(xdata, value = 'into')        # features x samples; filled cells are imputations
defs <- featureDefinitions(xdata)                   # mzmed / rtmed per feature, for annotation + mummichog

Stage 2 -- QC, Drift, Normalization (not naive median + half-min)

Goal: Filter junk features, flatten injection-order drift, normalize per-sample dilution, and impute by mechanism -- before any test sees the data.

Approach: Follow the normalization-qc pipeline order: blank/detection filter -> within-batch drift correction (QCRSC) -> RSD/D-ratio filter -> PQN -> mechanism-aware imputation. Do NOT silently half-min-impute and feed limma; validate drift correction on held-out QCs, not on QC clustering.

library(pmp)
# feature_matrix: features in ROWS, samples in COLUMNS (pmp convention); transpose featureValues output
fm <- t(feat)

filtered <- filter_peaks_by_fraction(fm, classes = sample_class, min_frac = 0.5, qc_label = 'QC')
corrected <- QCRSC(df = filtered, order = injection_order, batch = batch_id,
                   classes = sample_class, spar = 0, minQC = 5, qc_label = 'QC')  # CV-selected spline
rsd_filtered <- filter_peaks_by_rsd(corrected, max_rsd = 30, classes = sample_class, qc_label = 'QC')
normalized <- pqn_normalisation(rsd_filtered, classes = sample_class, qc_label = 'QC')
# Impute only the sparse residual holes, by mechanism (QRILC for MNAR / left-censored); see normalization-qc.

Drift correction should lower QC RSD AND leave biological-sample RSD unchanged; if biological RSD rises, the spline absorbed signal. Mechanism-aware imputation (QRILC/GSimp for left-censored zeros) replaces the old half-min step, which collapses imputed-subset variance and inflates false significance.

Stage 3 -- Annotation Before Claiming IDs

Goal: Attach an MSI/Schymanski confidence level to each feature so the pathway stage knows what it is allowed to claim.

Approach: Match MS/MS to a library (Level 2a) or run SIRIUS/CSI:FingerID (formula Level 4, structure Level 2b/3); a bare m/z is Level 5. Collapse ion families (CAMERA) first so adducts of one compound are not counted as separate metabolites. Mechanics and thresholds live in metabolomics/metabolite-annotation. Annotation and statistics are independent axes -- run them in parallel and join on feature_id.

Stage 4 -- Statistics (univariate FDR + validated multivariate)

Goal: Decide which metabolites genuinely differ, with neither a score plot nor an unadjusted p-value standing alone.

Approach: Transform (if heteroscedastic), pick a scaling explicitly (run >=1 alternative and check the conclusion is not scaling-fragile), run a Welch/Mann-Whitney univariate test with BH FDR, AND a permutation-validated OPLS-DA (permI >= 1000), then reconcile the two. Full validation checklist in metabolomics/statistical-analysis.

library(ropls)
# t(normalized): samples x features; group aligned to sample order
group <- factor(sample_info$group[sample_info$group != 'QC'])
oplsda <- opls(t(normalized)[study_samples, ], group, predI = 1, orthoI = NA,
               scaleC = 'pareto', permI = 1000, crossvalI = 7,
               fig.pdfC = 'none', info.txtC = 'none')
summ <- getSummaryDF(oplsda)   # claim licensed only if Q2 high AND pQ2 small; R2Y alone proves nothing

Univariate Welch + BH (p.adjust(method='BH') in R, multipletests(method='fdr_bh') in Python -- neither default is BH) gives the per-feature answer with effect sizes. Features are correlated (adducts, pathways), so collapse to compounds before counting "how many metabolites changed."

Stage 5 -- Pathway Mapping (the background is the null)

Goal: Interpret the differential result in pathway context without laundering annotation uncertainty into confident biology.

Approach: Two disjoint entry points. Confidently identified compounds -> ORA/MSEA with an assay-coverage background (NOT all of KEGG). Raw m/z with no IDs -> mummichog/PSEA whose permutation null is sampled from the FULL feature table. Either way, report mapping coverage and the MSI levels of the driving compounds; downgrade claims to "consistent with perturbation." Full method choice and background construction in metabolomics/pathway-mapping.

library(MetaboAnalystR)
# Path A: identified compounds (MSI level 1-2) -> ORA
mSet <- InitDataObjects('conc', 'pathora', FALSE)
mSet <- SetOrganism(mSet, 'hsa')
mSet <- Setup.MapData(mSet, identified_compounds)
mSet <- CrossReferencing(mSet, 'name')
mSet <- CreateMappingResultTable(mSet)              # inspect coverage before trusting any p-value
mSet <- SetKEGG.PathLib(mSet, 'hsa', 'current')
mSet <- SetMetabolomeFilter(mSet, TRUE)             # TRUE = restrict to measured metabolome (the honest background)
mSet <- CalculateOraScore(mSet, 'rbc', 'hyperg')

# Path B: no IDs -> mummichog on the FULL peak table (m/z + p-value + t-score)
# mSet <- InitDataObjects('mass_all', 'mummichog', FALSE)
# mSet <- UpdateInstrumentParameters(mSet, 5.0, 'negative')   # ppm + ionization mode are mandatory
# mSet <- Read.PeakListData(mSet, 'peaks_full.txt')           # ENTIRE table, not significant-only
# mSet <- PerformPSEA(mSet, 'hsa_mfn', 'current', permNum = 1000)

Alternative Front End -- MS-DIAL

When peak detection happens in the MS-DIAL GUI/console (MS2Dec deconvolution, GC-EI, DIA/SWATH), import the alignment-result table and enter the pipeline at Stage 2. The framing is unchanged: the imported table is still a parameterized hypothesis. See metabolomics/msdial-preprocessing for the export-parsing details, then continue with normalization-qc onward.

QC Checkpoints

Each gate hands off to its component skill when it fails; "refresh" means re-run the upstream stage with revised parameters, not patch the symptom downstream.

StageKeep (pass)Refresh (fail) -> where
Feature extractionEIC + alignment of top hits inspect cleanly; feature count plausible after redundancy collapseTune centWave/bw against EIC FWHM -> xcms-preprocessing
Drift correctionQC RSD dropped AND biological-sample RSD unchanged; dilution-QC linearity holdsBack off spline span / exclude weak-in-QC features -> normalization-qc
QC qualityQC RSD <= 20-30%, D-ratio <= 0.5, blank ratio >= 3-5xDrop failing features; check instrument/injection -> normalization-qc
Missingnessimpute only sparse residual holes, by mechanism (no half-min-then-test)Detection-rate filter before imputing -> normalization-qc
PCA / QC clusteringpooled QCs cluster tightly at center; no batch-driven separationRevisit batch correction / design -> normalization-qc, experimental-design/batch-design
MultivariateQ2 high AND pQ2 small (permI >= 1000); PCA shows the same structureDo not report a noise-separated score plot -> statistical-analysis
Annotationeach reported name carries an MSI level; ion families collapsedDowngrade Level 3-5 names; do not promote a DB hit -> metabolite-annotation
Pathway backgroundORA uses assay-coverage background; mummichog uses the FULL tableSet SetMetabolomeFilter(TRUE) / supply R_all -> pathway-mapping

Common Errors

Error / symptomCauseSolution
could not find function "readMSData"Legacy xcms <3 APIUse readMsExperiment() + *Param verbs (xcms 4.x)
unused argument (ppm = ...)Loose args to findChromPeaksWrap in CentWaveParam(...), pass via param =
Features on uncorrected RTSkipped regroup after adjustRtimeCall groupChromPeaks again post-alignment
Significance explodes after imputationHalf-min impute then testMechanism-aware QRILC/GSimp on sparse holes only
Clean OPLS-DA plot but it is noisepermI = 20 (ropls default)permI >= 1000; read pQ2 from getSummaryDF
FDR is actually Holm/Holm-SidakR p.adjust default 'holm'; statsmodels 'hs'Pass BH explicitly
Every pathway is significantORA on all-of-KEGG / mummichog on significant-onlyAssay-coverage background; supply the FULL feature table

References

  • Smith CA, Want EJ, O'Maille G, Abagyan R, Siuzdak G. 2006. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal Chem 78:779-787.
  • Broadhurst D, Goodacre R, Reinke SN, Kuligowski J, Wilson ID, Lewis MR, Dunn WB. 2018. Guidelines and considerations for the use of system suitability and quality control samples in mass spectrometry assays applied in untargeted clinical metabolomic studies. Metabolomics 14:72.
  • Westerhuis JA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smit S, Vis DJ, Smilde AK, et al. 2008. Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics 4:81-89.
  • Schymanski EL, Jeon J, Gulde R, Fenner K, Ruff M, Singer HP, Hollender J. 2014. Identifying small molecules via high resolution mass spectrometry: communicating confidence. Environ Sci Technol 48:2097-2098.
  • Wieder C, Frainay C, Poupin N, Rodriguez-Mier P, Vinson F, Cooke J, Lai RPJ, Bundy JG, Jourdan F, Ebbels T. 2021. Pathway analysis in metabolomics: recommendations for the use of over-representation analysis. PLOS Comput Biol 17(9):e1009105.

Related Skills

  • metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing - Stage 1 feature extraction parameters and the feature-table-as-artifact framing
  • metabolomics/normalization-qc - Stage 2 drift correction, RSD/D-ratio filtering, PQN, mechanism-aware imputation
  • metabolomics/metabolite-annotation - Stage 3 MSI/Schymanski confidence levels
  • metabolomics/statistical-analysis - Stage 4 permutation-validated multivariate and dependence-aware FDR
  • metabolomics/pathway-mapping - Stage 5 ORA vs mummichog and background construction
  • metabolomics/msdial-preprocessing - Alternative front end entering at Stage 2
  • metabolomics/lipidomics - Lipid-specific peak widths and annotation
  • metabolomics/targeted-analysis - Absolute quantification branch
  • metabolomics/isotope-tracing - Separate stable-isotope flux branch, not a stage of this untargeted pipeline
  • multi-omics-integration/mofa-integration - Integrating the feature table with other omics layers

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Simplest distributed training API. 4 lines to add distributed support to any PyTorch script. Unified API for DeepSpeed/FSDP/Megatron/DDP. Automatic device placement, mixed precision (FP16/BF16/FP8). Interactive config, single launch command. HuggingFace ecosystem standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

huang-sh/DeepScience42026年7月15日 更新

ADMET property prediction for drug candidates. Full pharmacokinetic panel (Caco-2, PPB, clearance, CYP), toxicity (hERG, AMES, DILI), drug-likeness (Lipinski, QED), using RDKit descriptors and TDC models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

huang-sh/DeepScience42026年7月15日 更新

Interpretable ADMET analysis with mechanistic reasoning. Maps liabilities to structural causes and biological pathways. Based on CoTox (Park 2025) and DrugR (Liu 2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

huang-sh/DeepScience42026年7月15日 更新

aeon

無料

This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard ML approaches. Particularly suited for univariate and multivariate time series analysis with scikit-learn compatible APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

huang-sh/DeepScience42026年7月15日 更新

arboreto

無料

Infer gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from gene expression data using scalable algorithms (GRNBoost2, GENIE3). Use when analyzing transcriptomics data (bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq) to identify transcription factor-target gene relationships and regulatory interactions. Supports distributed computation for large-scale datasets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

huang-sh/DeepScience42026年7月15日 更新

astropy

無料

Comprehensive Python library for astronomy and astrophysics. This skill should be used when working with astronomical data including celestial coordinates, physical units, FITS files, cosmological calculations, time systems, tables, world coordinate systems (WCS), and astronomical data analysis. Use when tasks involve coordinate transformations, unit conversions, FITS file manipulation, cosmological distance calculations, time scale conversions, or astronomical data processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

huang-sh/DeepScience42026年7月15日 更新

huang-sh のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する