矛盾分析法：把复杂问题拆成若干对立面，找出规定其他矛盾的主要矛盾及其主要方面，判定对抗性 / 非对抗性，并据此选择处理方式。当问题头绪多、多个因素互相牵制、优先级不清、根因不明、反复修不好、trade-off 说不清时触发；直接执行类任务或用户已定方案时不触发。
English: Contradiction analysis. Decompose a tangled problem into opposing forces, isolate the principal contradiction and its dominant side, classify it as antagonistic or non-antagonistic, and choose the response accordingly. Trigger on unclear priorities, unknown root causes, recurring failures, or trade-offs that resist explanation; skip for direct execution or when the user has already chosen the solution.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
"研究任何过程，如果是存在着两个以上矛盾的复杂过程的话，就要用全力找出它的主要矛盾。捉住了这个主要矛盾，一切问题就迎刃而解了。" —— 《矛盾论》
用：
不用：
先保证事实基础：矛盾清单里的每一项都要能指向调查得到的现象，不能凭印象。事实不够先做 investigation-first。
[A] vs [B] 格式，写清两个对立面各自要什么。透过现象看内在张力，不只列表面症状。practice-cognition 验证concentrate-forces 集中解决主要矛盾overall-planning矛盾清单：
- [A] vs [B]：……
- ⭐ [C] vs [D]：主要矛盾。理由：解决了它，[X]、[Y] 随之缓解
- 主要方面：当前 [C / D] 占支配地位，因为 ……
- 性质：对抗性 / 非对抗性
接下来我将：……
⚠️ 需监控：[次要矛盾] 是否上升为主要矛盾；[矛盾] 是否激化
concentrate-forces 集中解决，或 practice-cognition 验证假说investigation-first原著依据：original-texts.md；场景速查：contradiction-types-reference.md
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
求是方法论的入口与总原则。在每次新的顶层会话开始时加载一次，用「实事求是」约束全部判断，并只在明确适用时把任务路由到对应的方法论 skill；被派遣执行单一具体任务的子 agent 直接跳过。 English: Entry point and governing principle of the Qiushi methodology. Load once at the start of a top-level session to enforce "seek truth from facts" and route to a downstream skill only when it clearly helps. Delegated sub-agents on narrow tasks should skip it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
集中兵力：多件事同时争抢时间、注意力或预算时，列出全部待办，选定唯一主攻目标并公开锁定，彻底解决、验证后再转向下一个。当待办过多、推进分散、"每件都做了一点但都没做完"、需要决定先做什么时触发；只有一个任务、任务彼此独立可并行、用户明确要求同时推进时不触发。 English: Concentrate forces. When several tasks compete for time, attention, or budget, enumerate them, lock onto a single main target, finish and verify it completely, then move on. Trigger when priorities sprawl, effort is scattered, or you must decide what to do first; skip when there is one task, tasks are independent and parallel, or the user explicitly wants them advanced together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
批评与自我批评：在工作完成、阶段验收、收到批评或同类错误反复出现时，对成果和过程做诚实、具体、基于事实的审视，输出可执行的改进项，并处理外来批评而不辩解。触发信号包括 review、复盘、审查、"帮我看看有没有问题"、"你确定吗"；任务刚开始或只是单步查询时不触发。 English: Criticism and self-criticism. After delivery, at a review checkpoint, on receiving criticism, or when the same mistake recurs, examine the result and the process honestly and concretely, produce actionable fixes, and accept valid criticism without defensiveness. Triggers include review, retrospective, audit, "check this for problems", "are you sure"; skip at the start of a task or for one-step lookups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
调查研究：在下判断、做决策、给建议之前，先用第一手材料弄清现状，产出「事实 / 推断 / 未知」三栏调查结论。当上下文不完整、证据薄弱、领域陌生、用户说"先别动手"、或你发现自己在凭印象作答时触发；已充分调查后的执行阶段不要重复触发。 English: Investigate before judging. Gather firsthand facts and produce a fact / inference / unknown ledger before any recommendation. Trigger when context is incomplete, evidence is thin, the domain is unfamiliar, the user says "look first", or you notice yourself answering from impression; skip when investigation is already done and the task is pure execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
群众路线：从持有真实情况的多方（用户、使用者、代码库、日志、运行结果）收集分散意见，系统化为方案，再带回去对齐与检验，循环改进。当多方意见分歧、需要汇总零散反馈、方案要拿回给真实使用者确认、或你发觉自己在闭门造车时触发；信息源单一且完整、处于执行阶段时不触发。 English: Mass line. Collect scattered input from everyone who holds ground truth (users, operators, codebase, logs, runtime results), synthesize it into a coherent plan, take it back for alignment and validation, and iterate. Trigger when inputs conflict, feedback must be consolidated, a plan needs sign-off from real users, or you sense you are designing in isolation; skip when there is a single complete source and the work is pure execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
统筹兼顾：当多个目标、指标或利益方相互制约、优化一项会伤害另一项时，识别全部辩证关系对，检查片面性，为每对关系定出当前阶段的侧重与底线，评估系统性影响，并设失衡预警。触发信号包括 trade-off、目标冲突、速度 vs 质量、短期 vs 长期、"顾此失彼"；只有单一目标、用户已定取舍、或属硬性二选一时不触发。 English: Overall planning. When several goals, metrics, or stakeholders constrain each other and optimizing one harms another, map every dialectical pair, check for one-sidedness, set the current emphasis and floor for each pair, assess system-wide effects, and define imbalance alarms. Triggers include trade-offs, goal conflicts, speed vs quality, short vs long term; skip for single-goal work, decisions the user already made, or hard either/or constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。