本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

semantic-gap-analysis

Use when a page ranks for a keyword but isn't in the top 3 and you want to know exactly what's missing. The agent compares the page to the top-ranking competitors and produces a specific list of entities, subtopics, and relationships to add.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB
  • references/eav-triple-worked-examples.md10.4 KB
  • references/gap-classification-rubric.md7.0 KB
  • references/predicate-verb-fields.md7.4 KB
  • references/topic-cluster-strategy.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Semantic Gap Analysis

Identifies the exact entities, subtopics, predicates, and relationships that are missing from your page but present in top-ranking competitors. This is the content brief for what to add — not a generic "write more depth" recommendation.

Google's NLP models (BERT, MUM, Gemini) build a semantic graph of your content. If you're missing nodes or edges that competitors have, your content reads as shallow to the algorithm. This skill finds the exact missing nodes.

Input

  • URL of your page (required)
  • Target keyword the page should rank for (required)

Role

You are a semantic SEO specialist in the tradition of Koray Tuğberk GÜBÜR. You think in entities, attributes, and relationships — not keywords.

Step 1: Read Your Page

Fetch the URL. Extract:

  • Main topic and sub-topics
  • All named entities (people, places, products, concepts, dates, organizations)
  • All predicates (verbs that signal the contextual depth — for "coffee brewing", verbs like grind, extract, bloom, tamp)
  • Internal structure: H2/H3 hierarchy
  • What the page explicitly covers and what it implicitly assumes

Step 2: Read the Top 3 Competitors

Google the target keyword. Fetch the top 3 results in full. If one won't fetch, take the next result down and say so — a gap list built on an inferred page is worthless. For each:

  • Extract entities, predicates, and structural elements the same way
  • Note what they cover that your page doesn't
  • Note the depth at which they discuss each entity (single mention vs. full section)

Step 3: Build the Semantic Inventory

Create three lists side by side:

Your page coversCompetitors cover but you don'tUnique to your page

Be specific. "Pricing models" is too generic. "Three-tier vs usage-based pricing with examples from Stripe and Twilio" is specific.

Step 4: Classify the Gaps

For each gap, classify its importance:

  • Core gap — all 3 competitors cover this, you don't. Critical to add.
  • Differentiator gap — 1-2 competitors cover this and it's working for them. Worth adding.
  • Commodity gap — everyone covers this superficially. Add briefly or skip.
  • Opportunity gap — competitors skip this, you could own it. Your angle.

Step 5: Map Entity Relationships

For the core gaps, identify the Entity-Attribute-Value (EAV) relationships that should exist:

  • Entity: what is it
  • Attribute: what properties does it have that matter
  • Value/Relation: how does it relate to other entities in this topic space

Example for "espresso machine reviews":

  • Entity: La Marzocco Linea Mini
  • Attribute: brew pressure, boiler type, price point
  • Relation: competes with Rocket Appartamento, used by third-wave cafes

This is what competitors are implicitly encoding when they write detailed sections — you need the same density.

Step 6: Output

Semantic Fingerprint

One sentence on what your page actually "talks about" to an NLP model, and what it should talk about.

Your Page

List of entities and predicates currently present.

Competitor Coverage

What each top 3 competitor covers that yours doesn't (specific sections, with brief notes on why they chose to include them).

Gap List

GapImportanceAdd to sectionDepth required

Importance: Core / Differentiator / Commodity / Opportunity. Section: where in your H2/H3 structure this belongs. Depth: Paragraph / subsection / full section.

Entity Relationships to Encode

The EAV triples that should appear in your page, even if just in passing. These are the signals that tell Google "this content understands the topic space."

Unique Angle to Preserve

What your page does well that competitors don't. Don't lose this when adding depth.

Content Addition Plan

Specific sections to add or expand, in order of priority. Each with: section heading, 2-3 sentence description of what goes in it, estimated word count.

What to Ignore

  • Keyword density for related terms — don't force. Semantic relevance is about covering the entities, not repeating the keyword variants.
  • Fluff additions — every section you add should carry actual information. Padding defeats the purpose.
  • Wikipedia-style completeness — you don't need to cover everything. You need to cover enough that an NLP model recognizes the topic depth.

Next Step

Turn the content addition plan into an actual rewrite: use the improve-content skill with your page URL as input, and paste the gap list as context.

Bundled references

Load from references/ only when the step calls for them.

  • eav-triple-worked-examples.md — full Entity-Attribute-Value examples across 6 niches for Step 5 (when the EAV framework feels abstract and you need concrete analogues)
  • predicate-verb-fields.md — domain-specific verb fields that signal contextual depth to NLP models (Step 3, when extracting predicates from competitor pages)
  • gap-classification-rubric.md — detailed scoring for Core / Differentiator / Commodity / Opportunity gaps (Step 4, when classification is ambiguous)
  • topic-cluster-strategy.md — how the gap list feeds into cluster architecture (optional, when the gaps reveal missing spokes rather than in-page sections)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when planning a new article. The agent Googles the keyword, reads the top 10 results, classifies intent, maps the content gap, and produces a writer-ready brief with structure, outline, and on-page artifacts. No keyword tool required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inhouseseo/superseo-skills3532026年9月4日 更新

Use when auditing a page for E-E-A-T signals. The agent reads the page and scores Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness — then tells you exactly what to add to each dimension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inhouseseo/superseo-skills3532026年9月4日 更新

Use when extracting first-party expertise from a subject-matter expert before writing content. Produces a knowledge document of contrarian takes, specific examples, and surprising outcomes that AI can't fabricate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inhouseseo/superseo-skills3532026年9月4日 更新

Use when you want to win a featured snippet for a keyword you already rank for. The agent checks the current snippet format, analyzes your content, and rewrites the relevant section to match what Google wants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inhouseseo/superseo-skills3532026年9月4日 更新

Use when rewriting or refreshing an existing page that's underperforming. The agent fetches the URL, analyzes the current content, researches the SERP, and rewrites using the full anti-AI-slop ruleset — no data exports needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inhouseseo/superseo-skills3532026年9月4日 更新

Use when planning to rank for a specific keyword. The agent Googles it, reads the top 10, classifies intent, reads the top 3 competitor pages, and produces a 90-day ranking plan with intent, SERP analysis, and content recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inhouseseo/superseo-skills3532026年9月4日 更新

inhouseseo のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する