本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

using-superjawn

Establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before any response. Use when starting any conversation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml143 B
  • references/codex-tools.md4.0 KB
  • references/copilot-tools.md2.1 KB
  • references/gemini-tools.md1.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- Adapted from obra/superpowers using-superpowers skill (v5.0.7), MIT-licensed, copyright 2025 Jesse Vincent. Modifications copyright 2026 Joe Amditis. v0.6.0 ports as a renamed consumer skill: directory + frontmatter `name:` field move from `using-superpowers` to `using-superjawn` so the bootstrap skill matches the local plugin's identity. Two body references to the system name ("Superpowers skills") are rebranded to "superjawn skills" to match. The rename makes byte-parity with upstream impossible by definition; `skill_md_parity` is false in the manifest and `upstream_name` is set to `using-superpowers` so the validator's parity + supporting-file checks resolve against the right upstream directory. See CREDITS.md. --> <SUBAGENT-STOP> If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill. </SUBAGENT-STOP> <EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.

IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.

This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this. </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>

Instruction Priority

superjawn skills override default system prompt behavior, but user instructions always take precedence:

  1. User's explicit instructions (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests), highest priority
  2. superjawn skills, override default system behavior where they conflict
  3. Default system prompt, lowest priority

If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "skip the research phase" and a skill says "always research first," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.

How to Access Skills

In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you, follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.

In Copilot CLI: Use the skill tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins. The skill tool works the same as Claude Code's Skill tool.

In Gemini CLI: Skills activate via the activate_skill tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.

In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.

Platform Adaptation

Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see references/copilot-tools.md (Copilot CLI), references/codex-tools.md (Codex) for tool equivalents. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.

Using Skills

The Rule

Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.

digraph skill_flow {
    "User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
    "About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
    "Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
    "Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
    "Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
    "Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
    "Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];

    "About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
    "Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";

    "User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
    "Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
    "Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
    "Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}

Red Flags

These thoughts mean STOP, you're rationalizing:

ThoughtReality
"This is just a simple question"Questions are tasks. Check for skills.
"I need more context first"Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions.
"Let me explore the codebase first"Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first.
"I can check git/files quickly"Files lack conversation context. Check for skills.
"Let me gather information first"Skills tell you HOW to gather information.
"This doesn't need a formal skill"If a skill exists, use it.
"I remember this skill"Skills evolve. Read current version.
"This doesn't count as a task"Action = task. Check for skills.
"The skill is overkill"Simple things become complex. Use it.
"I'll just do this one thing first"Check BEFORE doing anything.
"This feels productive"Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this.
"I know what that means"Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it.

Skill Priority

When multiple skills could apply, use this order:

  1. Process skills first (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
  2. Implementation skills second (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution

"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.

Skill Types

Rigid (debugging, verification): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.

Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.

The skill itself tells you which.

User Instructions

Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Scholarly writing and research compliance. Use for CRediT, preregistration, Plan S, Nelson Memo, preprints, ORCID, LLM disclosure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism4182026年10月5日 更新

Web accessibility patterns for news and academic sites. Use for WCAG audits, alt text, accessible data viz, and assistive tech.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism4182026年10月5日 更新

Eliminates AI-generated writing patterns that erode reader trust. Use when writing or editing articles, docs, or press releases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism4182026年10月5日 更新

API hardening for Express, FastAPI, and serverless. Use for rate limiting, CORS, input validation, API keys, or OWASP API Top 10.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism4182026年10月5日 更新

Explores intent and design before implementation. MUST use before creating or modifying any feature, component, or behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism4182026年10月5日 更新

Public records requests under Brazil's Access to Information Law (LAI). Use for Fala.BR filings, e-SIC, and CGU/CMRI appeals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism4182026年10月5日 更新

jamditis のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する