If the user's intent does not match the purpose of this skill, load plugin-creator:plugin-lifecycle to route to the right skill and process.

Output Style Creator

Create output styles: markdown files whose body replaces Claude Code's default system instructions for every turn of a session. Setting keep-coding-instructions: true retains the built-in software engineering instructions alongside it. An output style sets role, tone, and default response format.

SOURCE: Output styles (accessed 2026-09-13)

Quick Reference

• Output style schema — frontmatter fields, install locations and resolution order, plugin packaging, subagent behavior, troubleshooting
• Output style templates — complete ready-to-adapt style files for common roles
• plugin-creator:claude-plugins-reference-2026 — plugin manifest reference for outputStyles packaging

Choose the Right Mechanism First

Pick the mechanism from this table before writing anything.

Need	Mechanism	Why
Different role, tone, or response shape on every turn	Output style	Replaces the default instructions for the whole session
Project conventions, architecture, codebase facts	CLAUDE.md	Adds a user message after the system prompt; changes nothing about the defaults
One-off addition at launch	--append-system-prompt	Appends without removing the defaults
A separately scoped helper for one focused task, or any behavior that must hold inside delegated work	Agent	Runs its own system prompt, model, and tools — an output style never reaches a subagent
A reusable workflow invoked when relevant	Skill	Loads task-specific instructions on demand

An output style is the wrong answer to "Claude should know X". It is the right answer to "Claude should always answer like X".

SOURCE: Output styles — Comparisons to related features (accessed 2026-09-13)

SOURCE: Subagents (accessed 2026-09-13)

Built-in Styles — Check Before Creating

Style	Behavior
Default	Standard software engineering instructions
Proactive	Executes immediately, assumes instead of pausing, prefers action over planning; stronger than auto mode's autonomous-execution guidance and independent of the permission mode, which still decides what runs without asking
Concise	Leads with the result, skips preamble, keeps responses short; full detail on request; always delivers error reports, security warnings, and destructive-action confirmations complete; requires Claude Code v2.1.237 or later
Explanatory	Adds educational "Insights" between engineering tasks
Learning	Shares insights and asks the user to write small strategic pieces; inserts TODO(human) markers

SOURCE: Output styles — Built-in output styles (accessed 2026-09-13)

Your Workflow

<workflow>

Phase 1: Discovery

1. RUN discovery:

   SKILL_DIR='<absolute path of the directory holding this SKILL.md>'
   uv run "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/validate_output_style.py" discover --plugin '{plugin-path}'
   

   Omit --plugin when no plugin is in scope.

2. READ the styles it lists. Every ancestor .claude/output-styles/ is in force at once; a nearer directory shadows a farther one only where both define the same style name. A plugin's outputStyles key shadows the plugin's default output-styles/ directory outright. So a style you cannot see may be the one in force, and a directory you can see may be scanned by nobody. Report anything under plugin_manifest_problems, plugin_rejected_paths, or project_rejected_paths as a defect in the manifest or repository that declares it. A plugin with a manifest problem reports no styles, because the declaration that would name them cannot be read — that is a broken manifest, not a plugin shipping nothing.

3. IDENTIFY whether the request is already served by a built-in style or an existing custom style. Adapting an existing style beats adding a near-duplicate.

Phase 2: Requirements Gathering

ASK the user to settle these before writing, through whichever interaction mechanism the harness provides (AskUserQuestion in Claude Code, a plain question elsewhere):

1. Role — what is Claude acting as for the whole session?
2. Coding instructions — does the session still write and verify code? This sets keep-coding-instructions.
3. Response shape — what must every response contain, and in what order?
4. Scope — user, project, managed policy, or plugin-bundled.
5. Plugin activation — for a plugin style only: should it apply automatically when the plugin is enabled (force-for-plugin)?
6. Picker line — the one line that tells a user in the /config list when to pick this style over the others already installed. This becomes description.

Set keep-coding-instructions: true when the session is still software engineering and only the communication changes. Leave it out when Claude is doing something else entirely, such as writing or data analysis.

SOURCE: Output styles — Create a custom output style (accessed 2026-09-13)

Phase 3: Authoring

WRITE the file as frontmatter plus instructions. The filename becomes the style name unless name is set. Start from a worked style in output-style-templates.md rather than a blank file; its Selection Guide maps the keep-coding-instructions decision and the forced-plugin case onto a starting template.

Authoring rules:

• Write the body as a system prompt, not a README about the style. Start with the conclusion, then the evidence is a system prompt; this style is concise is a README.
• State the target behavior, not the ban. The body is re-sent as system instructions every turn, so a prohibition keeps the forbidden behavior loaded and half-reads as an instruction to perform it. Deliver error text in full beats Never truncate error text. Keep a prohibition only where the failure is silent and total, and pair it with the positive.
• Name the exception cases. A style that shortens output must say what stays complete — error text, security warnings, destructive-action confirmations.
• Keep the body proportionate. Every line is re-sent as input tokens on each request.
• Put project facts in CLAUDE.md. A style that names files or conventions stops being portable.
• Retain the default engineering instructions with keep-coding-instructions: true rather than paraphrasing them.

Full field semantics and defaults: output-style-schema.md.

Phase 4: Placement

Scope	Path	Applies to
User	~/.claude/output-styles/{name}.md	Every project for this user
Project	.claude/output-styles/{name}.md	This repository, checked into git
Managed policy	.claude/output-styles/ inside the managed settings directory	Every user under the policy
Plugin	{plugin-path}/output-styles/{name}.md	Selectable in every session with the plugin enabled; applied without selection only with force-for-plugin: true

For a plugin style, the output-styles/ directory is auto-discovered. Do NOT add the outputStyles key to plugin.json for styles in that default directory — declaring the key replaces the default scan entirely and makes every style outside the declared paths invisible. Add the key only for non-default locations, and then list ./output-styles/ explicitly alongside them.

SOURCE: Plugins reference — outputStyles (accessed 2026-09-13)

Phase 5: Validation

RUN this check on every style, at any scope:

SKILL_DIR='<absolute path of the directory holding this SKILL.md>'
uv run "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/validate_output_style.py" check '{style-path}'

For a plugin-bundled style, also validate the containing plugin:

uvx skilllint@latest check '{plugin-path}'
if command -v claude >/dev/null; then
  claude plugin validate '{plugin-path}'
else
  echo 'SKIPPED: claude plugin validate — Claude Code CLI not installed'
fi

Report a skipped claude plugin validate in the completion report, with the manifest check still outstanding.

The script covers the frontmatter. A style with an empty body exits 0, so READ these yourself:

• description is one line and says when to pick this style, not what it is named
• name matches the intended display name, or is omitted deliberately so the filename supplies it
• keep-coding-instructions reflects whether the session still does engineering work
• force-for-plugin appears only in a plugin style, and only when automatic application is intended
• Body is imperative instruction to Claude, with no project-specific facts
• Exceptions are stated for anything the style suppresses or shortens
• Every rule in the body is observable in a response — a reader could tell whether it was followed
• For a plugin: plugin.json has no outputStyles key unless the styles live outside output-styles/

Phase 6: Activation and Testing

ACTIVATE the style through /config in the terminal, the / command menu in the VS Code extension, or the outputStyle setting anywhere else. Never the standalone /output-style command, which was removed in v2.1.91. Per-surface steps, version floors, and the settings-precedence chain: output-style-schema.md.

A style switch applies from the next message. In the terminal, style files are read at startup, so restart after creating or editing one mid-session; for a plugin-bundled style, /reload-plugins picks it up without a restart.

TEST all four prompts below, and record for each the prompt sent, the rule it exercises, and whether the rule held:

1. A request squarely in the style's domain — every ordering and formatting rule in the body holds.
2. A request outside it — the answer is still correct and complete, and the style's rules apply only where they fit.
3. An error case and a destructive-action case — the carve-outs are delivered verbatim and at full length.
4. If keep-coding-instructions: true — Claude still scopes the change and states how it verified the work.

A rule the four prompts never exercise is a rule you have not tested. Add a prompt until every rule in the body has been exercised at least once.

SOURCE: Output styles — Change your output style (accessed 2026-09-13)

Phase 7: Diagnosis

When a style does not take effect, DIAGNOSE it before re-authoring anything. Re-run Phase 1 discovery first — it shows every style in scope at every level, which settles most cases on its own: a second style of the same name in a nearer directory, or a managed-policy or plugin style you were not accounting for.

Then match the symptom in the troubleshooting table in output-style-schema.md. It covers a style absent from the picker, the wrong same-named style winning, and Claude no longer scoping or verifying code changes.

</workflow>