本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

analyzing-query-performance

Execute use when you need to work with query optimization. This skill provides query performance analysis with comprehensive guidance and automation. Trigger with phrases like "optimize queries", "analyze performance", or "improve query speed".

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • assets/README.md180 B
  • references/README.md69 B
  • scripts/README.md380 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Query Performance Analyzer

Overview

Analyze slow database queries using execution plans, wait statistics, and I/O metrics across PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB. This skill captures EXPLAIN output, identifies sequential scans on large tables, detects missing indexes, measures buffer cache hit ratios, and produces actionable optimization recommendations ranked by expected performance impact.

Prerequisites

  • Database credentials with permissions to run EXPLAIN ANALYZE (PostgreSQL), EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON (MySQL), or explain() (MongoDB)
  • pg_stat_statements extension enabled for PostgreSQL (provides aggregated query statistics)
  • Access to slow query logs or performance_schema (MySQL)
  • Baseline query execution times for comparison
  • psql, mysql, or mongosh CLI tools installed

Instructions

  1. Identify the slowest queries by examining pg_stat_statements (PostgreSQL): SELECT query, calls, mean_exec_time, total_exec_time FROM pg_stat_statements ORDER BY mean_exec_time DESC LIMIT 20. For MySQL, enable and query the slow query log or performance_schema.events_statements_summary_by_digest.

  2. Run EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT JSON) on each slow query in PostgreSQL, or EXPLAIN ANALYZE FORMAT=JSON in MySQL. Capture the full execution plan including actual row counts, loop iterations, and buffer usage.

  3. Analyze the execution plan for these red flags:

    • Sequential scans on tables with >10,000 rows (indicates missing index)
    • Nested loop joins with high outer row counts (consider hash join or merge join)
    • Sort operations without index support (adding a covering index eliminates the sort)
    • High rows_removed_by_filter relative to rows (predicate not selective enough)
    • Bitmap heap scans with high recheck rate (index selectivity too low)
  4. Check buffer cache performance: SELECT heap_blks_read, heap_blks_hit, heap_blks_hit::float / (heap_blks_hit + heap_blks_read) AS cache_hit_ratio FROM pg_statio_user_tables WHERE relname = 'table_name'. A ratio below 0.95 suggests the working set exceeds available shared_buffers.

  5. Evaluate index usage with SELECT indexrelname, idx_scan, idx_tup_read, idx_tup_fetch FROM pg_stat_user_indexes WHERE schemaname = 'public' ORDER BY idx_scan ASC. Indexes with zero scans are unused and waste write performance.

  6. Check for table bloat using SELECT relname, n_live_tup, n_dead_tup, n_dead_tup::float / GREATEST(n_live_tup, 1) AS dead_ratio FROM pg_stat_user_tables WHERE n_dead_tup > 1000 ORDER BY dead_ratio DESC. A dead tuple ratio above 0.2 indicates the table needs VACUUM.

  7. For each identified issue, generate a specific recommendation: CREATE INDEX statement with the exact columns, query rewrite suggestions, or configuration parameter adjustments.

  8. Estimate the performance impact of each recommendation by comparing the EXPLAIN plan before and after applying the change on a staging database or by analyzing the expected row reduction from new indexes.

  9. Prioritize recommendations by impact-to-effort ratio: index additions (high impact, low effort) before query rewrites (medium impact, medium effort) before schema changes (high impact, high effort).

  10. Generate a performance analysis report with before/after execution plans, estimated improvements, and implementation priority ranking.

Output

  • Slow query inventory with execution frequency, mean/P95 duration, and total time consumed
  • Annotated execution plans highlighting sequential scans, sort bottlenecks, and join inefficiencies
  • Index recommendations as ready-to-execute CREATE INDEX statements with expected impact
  • Query rewrite suggestions with original and optimized SQL side by side
  • Buffer cache analysis with shared_buffers sizing recommendations
  • Performance report ranking all findings by severity and implementation priority

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
EXPLAIN ANALYZE takes too long on productionQuery modifies data or runs for minutesUse EXPLAIN without ANALYZE for estimated plans; run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on staging with representative data
pg_stat_statements not availableExtension not installed or not in shared_preload_librariesRun CREATE EXTENSION pg_stat_statements; add to shared_preload_libraries in postgresql.conf and restart
Execution plan differs between staging and productionDifferent data distribution, statistics, or configurationRun ANALYZE on staging tables to update statistics; match work_mem, random_page_cost, and effective_cache_size settings
Index recommendation causes slow writesToo many indexes on a write-heavy tableLimit indexes to 5-7 per table; use partial indexes to reduce scope; consider covering indexes to replace multiple single-column indexes
Query plan uses wrong indexStale statistics or cost model miscalculationRun ANALYZE table_name to refresh statistics; adjust random_page_cost for SSD storage; use SET enable_seqscan = off to test index plans

Examples

Optimizing a dashboard aggregate query: A query computing daily revenue with GROUP BY date and JOIN across orders and line_items takes 12 seconds. EXPLAIN reveals a sequential scan on line_items (5M rows). Adding a composite index on (order_id, created_at) with INCLUDE (amount) reduces execution to 200ms by enabling an index-only scan.

Diagnosing N+1 query pattern: Application loads a list page showing 50 products, each with a separate query for category name. pg_stat_statements reveals SELECT name FROM categories WHERE id = $1 called 50 times per page load. Resolution: rewrite as a single JOIN query or implement eager loading in the ORM.

Identifying bloated table causing cache misses: Buffer cache hit ratio drops to 0.78 on the sessions table. Investigation reveals 80% dead tuples due to aggressive INSERT/DELETE cycling without autovacuum tuning. Setting autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.01 and running VACUUM FULL restores cache hit ratio to 0.99.

Resources

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Build a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-controlled Abridge integration code without calling undocumented vendor interfaces. Use when adding regression checks to an Abridge deployment repository. Trigger with "test the Abridge integration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2,8322026年10月12日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note-review, Epic handoff, and access failures from observed evidence without inventing vendor error codes. Use when an Abridge clinical workflow is degraded. Trigger with "diagnose this Abridge issue".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2,8322026年10月12日 更新

Design and verify the clinician workflow from consent through recording, draft review, Linked Evidence, and final note disposition. Use when implementing or auditing an Abridge clinical documentation pathway. Trigger with "map the Abridge note workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2,8322026年10月12日 更新

Verify the approved handoff of clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use when configuring or auditing Abridge-to-Epic documentation flow. Trigger with "verify the Abridge Epic handoff".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2,8322026年10月12日 更新

Evaluate Abridge adoption, workflow value, and avoidable operational friction without inventing prices or vendor billing meters. Use when reviewing an Abridge rollout or renewal. Trigger with "analyze Abridge value".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2,8322026年10月12日 更新

Produce a PHI-minimized Abridge support bundle with provenance, redaction, and protected escalation boundaries. Use when support needs reproducible evidence for an Abridge issue. Trigger with "build an Abridge debug bundle".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2,8322026年10月12日 更新

jeremylongshore のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する