Standard collaboration patterns for all squad agents — worktree awareness, decisions, cross-agent communication
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Graceful HTTP error handling in Web controllers with status-code-specific user messaging
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
ASP.NET Core Web controllers calling downstream APIs via HttpClient should differentiate HTTP error responses based on status code, providing appropriate user feedback:
This applies when:
try
{
var result = await _service.AddResourceAsync(id, data);
if (result is null)
{
TempData["ErrorMessage"] = "Failed to add resource.";
}
else
{
TempData["SuccessMessage"] = "Resource added successfully.";
}
}
catch (HttpRequestException ex)
{
// Differentiate based on status code
if (ex.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Conflict)
{
TempData["WarningMessage"] = "This resource is already associated.";
}
else if (ex.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.NotFound)
{
TempData["ErrorMessage"] = "The target resource was not found.";
}
else
{
TempData["ErrorMessage"] = $"Failed to add resource: {ex.Message}";
}
}
Ensure _Layout.cshtml (or equivalent) displays warning-level messages:
@if (TempData["SuccessMessage"] != null)
{
<div class="alert alert-success alert-dismissible fade show" role="alert">
@TempData["SuccessMessage"]
<button type="button" class="btn-close" data-bs-dismiss="alert"></button>
</div>
}
@if (TempData["WarningMessage"] != null)
{
<div class="alert alert-warning alert-dismissible fade show" role="alert">
@TempData["WarningMessage"]
<button type="button" class="btn-close" data-bs-dismiss="alert"></button>
</div>
}
@if (TempData["ErrorMessage"] != null)
{
<div class="alert alert-danger alert-dismissible fade show" role="alert">
@TempData["ErrorMessage"]
<button type="button" class="btn-close" data-bs-dismiss="alert"></button>
</div>
}
[Fact]
public async Task Action_When409Conflict_RedirectsWithWarningMessage()
{
// Arrange
var conflictException = new HttpRequestException(
"Conflict",
null,
System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Conflict);
_service.Setup(s => s.AddAsync(1, 2))
.ThrowsAsync(conflictException);
// Act
var result = await _controller.Add(viewModel);
// Assert
var redirectResult = Assert.IsType<RedirectToActionResult>(result);
Assert.Equal("This resource is already associated.", _controller.TempData["WarningMessage"]);
}
Problem: Adding a social media platform to an engagement returns 409 if already associated. Original code showed generic error.
Solution:
TempData["WarningMessage"] = "This platform is already associated with this engagement."TempData["ErrorMessage"] with technical detailsFiles:
src/JosephGuadagno.Broadcasting.Web/Controllers/EngagementsController.cs (lines 250-280)src/JosephGuadagno.Broadcasting.Web/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml (lines 148-161)src/JosephGuadagno.Broadcasting.Web.Tests/Controllers/EngagementsControllerTests.cs (AddPlatform tests)catch (HttpRequestException ex)
{
TempData["ErrorMessage"] = $"Failed: {ex.Message}"; // ← No differentiation
}
Problem: User can't tell if retry is safe or if something is broken.
if (ex.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Conflict)
{
// Silent ignore ← User has no feedback
}
Problem: User doesn't know the operation was a no-op.
if (ex.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Conflict)
{
TempData["SuccessMessage"] = "Resource added successfully."; // ← Misleading
}
Problem: User thinks resource was just added when it was already there.
| Status Code | Level | User Message Example | Retry Safe? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200/201/204 | Success | "Resource added successfully." | N/A |
| 400 | Error | "Invalid request: {details}" | No (fix data) |
| 404 | Error | "Resource not found." | No |
| 409 | Warning | "This resource is already associated." | Yes (no-op) |
| 422 | Error | "Validation failed: {details}" | No (fix data) |
| 500 | Error | "An error occurred. Please try again later." | Maybe |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Standard collaboration patterns for all squad agents — worktree awareness, decisions, cross-agent communication
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared hard rules enforced across all squad agents
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations with extensive frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate API controller scope checks to framework-enforced authorization policies while preserving ownership checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review API DTO implementations for contract/domain separation, mapping patterns, and REST compliance
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register shared claims transformation and hierarchical role policies in the API without breaking existing scope enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。