本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

quick

Quick mode for the rest of the session. Instead of CI's full checks, a change runs only the checks it can affect (format, lint, types and build, its own tests, and every unit, integration, flow and browser test that reaches the code it touched), and the rest of the suite is left for a full run such as a pull request's CI. Runs only when the user types it, and `/first-pass:quick off` turns it off.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

quick

<args> $ARGUMENTS </args>

If the block above says off, or the user's message with this command does, quick mode is off from now on: write "Checks: full" in the task list, and every change runs CI's full checks as the rules say, a change already built included, before it is called done. Otherwise quick mode is on, for the rest of this session, until the user types /first-pass:quick off. Asking for CI's whole suite on one change runs it for that change and leaves the mode on; words like "check everything", "cover all cases" or "full review" do not: they ask for full checks inside the task's scope, which the chosen checks are. Only this typed command turns it on: "be quick", "hurry" or "fast" in a prompt does not.

Quick mode changes which tests run here, nothing else: committing, pushing, pull requests, merging and deploying stay as the rules say, each only when the user asks.

With quick mode on, wherever the rules, ship-check and review's fixes (its step 8) ask for CI's checks (in the clean checkout while the reviews run, and once more on the final change), the checks the change can affect run instead, in the same clean checkout, within the same machine limits, and under the same yes rules for runs that reach real people:

  • the format, lint, type and build checks of every package the change touches;
  • every test the change adds or changes, and the tests of every file it changes;
  • every unit, integration, flow and end-to-end (browser) test file that reaches the changed code, directly or through its callers: the feature's own flow, and every other feature that reads or writes the same data or calls the same code (the pre-mortem's neighbors);
  • a part it reaches through shared code runs whole when the change alters what that other code sees (a shared package's exports, a migration, a config value, a route's or event's shape);
  • when the change touches jobs, payments, publishing, deletion or auth, the whole integration suite, as ship-check step 4 asks;

Find them in two steps: first follow the callers of each changed module, function, route, event and table, caller by caller, until each path reaches something a test can drive (a route, a job, an event, a command or a screen); then search the tests for the change, those callers and those entry points. Where the test runner lists the tests related to changed files (Jest's --findRelatedTests, Vitest's related), add its list too. Write the list in the plan. Run the chosen files with the commands CI uses for their suites, with the servers and databases those suites need. In a repo with a parts recipe, they run through the runner (ship-check step 4): each part whose steps take a test list (parts <repo> check says takes --tests) gets its chosen files with --tests <part>=<file>,<file>, the other chosen parts run whole by name, and nothing runs by hand outside it. A chosen file the runner refuses (a path a test runner would read as a pattern, or one outside the folder the part's tests run in) means that part runs whole, never that the file is left out. After a run, check that each chosen file shows in the test runner's own result lines in that part's log, named from the folder the runner ran in and with either slash (Jest's PASS and FAIL lines, Playwright's lines for that file, the names of node --test's tests from it), never in the command line pnpm or npm repeats above them: one that does not, did not run. A run that selects no tests is not a pass: fix the selection, or run that part whole. When unsure whether a test reaches the change, it runs. Everything else, test files that reach nothing the change touched, is not run here.

Nothing else changes: the test that fails first, the fresh review, looking at the UI running, and the words, monitoring and invariants checks all run as the rules say. A later edit reruns the checks it can affect, as always, and once the last edit is in, the chosen checks run once more on the final change unless each of them already ran after it.

Once the chosen checks pass (failures the base has too named) and every other step is done, the change is done. The report says "Full checks on the final change: not run (quick mode)" with what ran instead, so the user knows the rest of the suite is still to run, on a pull request's CI or when they ask for it.

Write "Checks: quick" in the plan, and in the task list as an item kept open while the mode is on, so it survives a compacted context; after a compaction, a task list without it means the full checks.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Bug-fix routine that fixes the whole class of bug, not just the reported instance. Use for any bug report, failing production behaviour, monitoring alert, audit finding or review finding that does real harm (a smaller review finding goes on the item's list, as ship-check says), and whenever the same kind of bug has been seen before. Reproduces it with a failing test, names the failure class, searches the task's scope for the same pattern (the whole codebase when the user's own prompt asks for the fix, not when it is picked from a task's list), fixes or records every hit, and adds the rule, invariant, helper or check that stops it coming back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

joetawil7/first-pass862026年10月15日 更新

Learns the words a user habitually writes to their coding agent that make its answers worse ("be 100% sure", "don't assume", "full review", "are you sure?", "all fine, right?"), from what they actually typed in their recent Claude Code sessions. Shows what each one does, what went wrong after it, and what to say instead, then writes the habit words block that maps each word to the checks it should trigger, so the checks run without the words. Use when asked to learn, read, refresh or review the user's habit words or prompts, "which of my words make you worse", from setup-first-pass's profile step, or when the start-of-session check says the habit words are due.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

joetawil7/first-pass862026年10月15日 更新

hulk

無料

Lifts the task's scope for one task. The session, its reviews and fix-the-class then look across the whole codebase and every repo that shares its code, data or vendors, and every problem found anywhere is handled by the usual rules. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

joetawil7/first-pass862026年10月15日 更新

jev

無料

Sets up, checks or changes the optional Jev judge, the TypeSafe decision model that ship-check asks about review findings (is this real harm, is a small one worth fixing now, what proof does a small fix need). Shows whether it is on for each repo, which key it uses, switches it on or off, and sends one test request. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

joetawil7/first-pass862026年10月15日 更新

premortem

無料

Run before writing or changing code for any feature, bug fix or refactor that touches data, jobs, money, outside services or user-facing behaviour. Finds where the change will break before it is built, by walking ten named failure classes (twice, halfway, outside call, failure-is-not-empty, neighbors, endings, money, hostile user, words, scale and time) against the code, and writes the answers into the plan. Use when planning a change, when asked to "think it through", "cover the gaps", "make sure it's bug free", or before any edit to payment, publishing, deletion, auth or background-job code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

joetawil7/first-pass862026年10月15日 更新

review

無料

Reviews a change before it is merged, from little or no input. With nothing typed it reviews the branch you are on, uncommitted work included, against its base, its PR and its ticket, so a developer can check their own work before asking for review. With PR links, repo#N or a branch it reviews someone else's change the same way, several repos at once. It judges the failed CI checks and every Bugbot and reviewer comment, gets a fresh breaker review, traces every other piece of code that uses what changed, proves each finding or marks it unproven, says what the merge needs (a build, env vars, migrations, deploy order) and how to check the deploy, never posts to GitHub, and offers fixes only after the report. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

joetawil7/first-pass862026年10月15日 更新

joetawil7 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する