本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

hostility-review

Audit an implementation against its plan with a hostile peer agent, debate findings to consensus, and drive fix waves until the auditor runs dry. Use when a done-claim needs verification the implementer cannot game ("hostile review", "adversarial audit", "is this PR faithful", "find the escape hatches") — the loop that beats the laziness bias with its own game theory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Hostility review — done is the auditor's empty round

Reviews fail when author and auditor share an incentive: both want "done". This loop splits them. Five moves; the mechanics live in /kolu.

  1. Fresh hostile eyes, zero stake. The auditor is a different model that never saw the brief and doesn't answer for the outcome. It audits the diff against the PLAN — not the code against itself — seeded with the ledger of previously named cheats. Evidence discipline: every finding cites the code and quotes the plan sentence it violates. No vibes.

  2. Verify, then debate. Trust no finding and no rebuttal: check each against the code yourself, concede what's real, refute with evidence, loop to consensus per finding. Judgment forks go to the human; evidence disputes never do.

  3. Fix waves with predicates. Each consensus becomes a wave brief whose done-whens cannot be satisfied by their letter: greps that return nothing, mutations actually performed and observed red, type-level pins. A test seam never widens a public API. A claim without its executed check is a finding.

  4. Loop until dry. The implementer's "done" triggers a re-audit of the pushed delta — including fresh residue the fixes introduced, and whether a fix merely relocated the defect. The campaign ends only on the auditor's clean round.

  5. Ratchet and scope. Every named cheat joins the ledger (the next run starts smarter) and graduates, where possible, into a permanent check — yesterday's judgment is tomorrow's red build. The graduated check is the weakest predicate that still catches the named cheat — a broader one makes tomorrow's red build a false one (arXiv:2301.12987). Effort follows worth: framework surface, then production semantics, then app tests — a guard of a guard is rarely worth a wave.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

blog-post

無料

Write a kolu blog post grounded in the real build history — mine the Claude Code session logs behind a feature for the actual story (for large efforts, fan out over the transcripts with an ultracode workflow), draft it in the author's voice, and wire it into the Astro site. Use when asked to write a blog post or engineering essay about something that was built, especially one that should read as a narrative of what actually happened rather than invented marketing copy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

juspay/kolu822026年10月22日 更新

ci

無料

Run this repo's CI end-to-end — kolu's policy on top of the odu runner: banned opt-out flags, x86_64-linux pinning, pool upkeep, fail-fast surfacing, e2e timing evidence, and the green-gate. Triggers on "run CI", "drive CI", "re-run the pipeline", "close the red check", "warm the pool". Runner mechanics live in the `/odu` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

juspay/kolu822026年10月22日 更新

Launch the kolu dev server on two RANDOM free ports so it never collides with the running production `kolu.service`, remember the ports for the rest of the session, and tear down only the dev instance. Load before running the app locally — for evidence capture, driving a live kolu with the chrome-devtools MCP, or any `just dev` you'd otherwise run by hand. Triggers on "run kolu locally", "launch the dev server", "boot kolu", "drive a live kolu", "start the app to screenshot it", or before pointing chrome-devtools at a local kolu.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

juspay/kolu822026年10月22日 更新

diataxis

無料

Classify, write, and audit documentation per Diátaxis (diataxis.fr) — the four-quadrant method (tutorials · how-to guides · reference · explanation). Encodes the compass as a decision procedure, each quadrant's contract as hard rules, and an executable mixed-mode audit. Project-agnostic; the per-repo doc-location mapping lives in a repo rule of the project's own (kolu: the Kolu overlay below). Use when writing any user-facing doc, structuring a docs site, or auditing existing docs for mixed modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

juspay/kolu822026年10月22日 更新

The Dock's agent-state folds — one fenced source of truth in @kolu/terminal-vocab, the load-bearing order≠colour split, and the one "is something happening" question. Use when editing agentProjection or the canvas dock.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

juspay/kolu822026年10月22日 更新

E2E test conventions — semantic selectors, arrange-steps that prove the process started, runtime markers that cannot match the shell echo, and absolute-path tool invocations. Use when writing or changing a .feature scenario under packages/tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

juspay/kolu822026年10月22日 更新

juspay のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する