本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

escalation-routing

The 15-minute escalation-routing runbook for the Plain support queue — detecting SLA breaches against {{sla_targets}}, VIP accounts in {{vip_accounts}}, and high severity, routing each qualifying ticket to the right team, opening a linked issue in {{linear_team}} when engineering is needed, and posting the alert to {{escalation_channel}}. Never closes a ticket or promises a resolution.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<skill name="escalation-routing"> <overview> Every open ticket in the Plain queue gets checked, every 15 minutes, against three independent escalation criteria: an SLA breach, a VIP account, or high severity. A qualifying ticket is routed to the right internal team, gets a linked Linear issue when it's an engineering problem, and generates one alert in the escalation Slack channel. A scheduled sweep spawns a fresh session with scoped read/route access to Plain, write access to Linear, and post access to Slack; this skill is the standard the routing is done to, so the agent doesn't reinvent SLA math or severity judgment on every run. Nothing customer-facing ever comes out of this skill — routing, a linked issue, and an internal alert are the entire output. </overview> <when-to-load> - The 15-minute escalation sweep fires. - A human asks why a ticket did or didn't escalate. - A human asks the agent to re-check the queue on demand. </when-to-load> <workflow>

Step 1 — Pull the open queue

Read every open, unresolved ticket in Plain. This is a fresh session every run, so pull the full current state of the queue — don't rely on which tickets escalated last sweep, since a ticket's SLA clock, account, and severity can all change between checks.

Step 2 — Check each ticket against the three criteria

CriteriaSignalSource
SLA breachFirst-response or resolution timer has passed the target for the ticket's tierTicket timestamps in Plain vs. {{sla_targets}}
VIP accountThe ticket's account name or domain matches the VIP listPlain customer/account field vs. {{vip_accounts}}
High severityThe ticket describes an outage, data loss, a security issue, or something blocking a paying customer's core workflowPlain tags and ticket body

Any single match qualifies the ticket for escalation. A ticket can match more than one criterion — carry every matching reason into Step 5, don't collapse to just one.

Step 3 — Route to the right team

Tag or assign the qualifying ticket to the team that owns it:

Ticket is aboutRoute to
A payment, invoice, or billing disputeBilling / Finance
A security or data-handling concernSecurity
An outage, bug, or product defectEngineering (continue to Step 4)
A VIP account issue with no technical fault (relationship, contract, expectations)Customer Success / Account team

This tag-or-assign update is the only write the agent makes to the ticket itself. It is never a status change, and it never closes or resolves the ticket.

Step 4 — Open a linked Linear issue when engineering is needed

Only for tickets routed to Engineering in Step 3 (outage, bug, product defect). Before filing, check the ticket for an existing linked issue — never open a duplicate for the same ticket.

Create the issue in {{linear_team}}:

  • Title — a short, specific summary of the reported problem.
  • Description — the account, the escalation reason(s) from Step 2, the relevant details or repro steps from the ticket, and a link back to the Plain ticket.
  • Priority — Urgent for an active outage, data loss, or an already SLA-breached ticket; High for a VIP account with a real bug; Normal otherwise, and let the engineering team triage from there.

Attach the created issue's URL back onto the Plain ticket as an internal note so the two records are linked in both directions.

Step 5 — Post the alert

Post one message per qualifying ticket to {{escalation_channel}}: the ticket link, the account name, every escalation reason that matched (SLA breach / VIP / severity), the team it was routed to, and the linked Linear issue URL if Step 4 created one.

Step 6 — Stop

One pass over the current queue is one run. There is no ledger — the next sweep, 15 minutes later, re-reads the queue's state at that point and starts over.

</workflow> <guardrails> - **Route and alert, never resolve.** The agent tags, assigns, opens a linked issue, and posts an alert. It never closes a ticket, marks one resolved, or changes its status in a way that ends the customer's case. - **No promises to the customer.** The agent never drafts or sends anything the customer can see, and never states or implies a resolution timeline. Every output is internal — the routing tag, the linked issue, and the escalation channel post. - **One linked issue per engineering escalation.** Check for an existing link before filing; never open a duplicate for the same ticket. - **Scoped secrets.** The Plain API key is injected at runtime; the Linear connector is brokered server-side. No raw credential is ever pasted into chat. - **Fresh, no memory between runs.** Plain's current queue state is the single source of truth each sweep — nothing from a prior run is assumed to still hold. </guardrails> </skill>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Policy runbook for turning a Slack access request into a least-privilege, policy-checked GitHub or AWS IAM grant. Covers the role-to-grant mapping, extra-scrutiny cases, the approval handshake, and how an applied grant gets logged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Get a complete picture of any company or person before outreach. This skill always works with web search, and gets significantly better with enrichment and CRM data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Daily read-only ad-performance runbook — budget pacing, CPA/ROAS drift, underperforming ads and keywords, and anomaly detection across Google Ads and Meta Ads, plus how to rank and word optimization recommendations for {{alert_channel}}.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Extraction, PO matching, duplicate detection, and overcharge tolerance for processing incoming vendor invoices from {{invoice_label}} against the POs and ledger in {{ap_ledger}}. Load this before extracting a single invoice so every one is checked to the same standard and only genuine exceptions reach a human, with no invoice ever scheduled for payment by the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Daily brand-mention monitoring loop for {{brand_terms}}. Searches news, social platforms, and forums for new mentions, dedupes against the ledger of mentions already reported, classifies sentiment and notability, and posts a digest with suggested response drafts to {{slack_channel}} — never posts, replies, or comments anywhere.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

kortix-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する