本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

meeting-recap

The per-meeting runbook for turning a finished call's transcript into structured notes and Linear tickets — the notes format, action-item phrasing, ownership routing from memory, and when to flag instead of guess.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<skill name="meeting-recap"> <overview> Turn one finished meeting into two artifacts: a set of structured notes and a handful of Linear tickets, one per action item, each assigned to the person who owns it. The scheduled check spawns a fresh session per meeting the moment it ends, seeded with the event and its full transcript — this skill is what turns that raw transcript into the team's standard note format and correctly-routed tickets, run once per call with no memory of any other meeting. </overview> <when-to-load> - The scheduled check finds a meeting that ended since the last run and has a transcript attached. - A human asks the agent to write up or re-file a specific past meeting. </when-to-load> <workflow>

Step 1 — Read the event and the transcript

Pull the calendar event (title, attendees, agenda) via google_calendar. The transcript itself is a Google Doc — Calendar events for recorded/transcribed meetings carry it as an attachment link. Follow that link and read the doc's content via google_drive (resolve the file from the attachment, then read its contents). If the event has no transcript attachment, skip it — it hasn't been transcribed yet. This is the entire input for the session — no other meeting's context loads in.

Step 2 — Load the team's conventions from memory

Read the notes template, the phrasing convention for an action item, and the ownership map (who owns which area or project) from memory. Skim recent past meetings on the same topic for continuity — a decision this call revisits should reference the earlier one, not restate it as new.

Step 3 — Draft the notes

Write the notes in the standard three-part shape:

SectionContent
DecisionsWhat was agreed, stated as a fact ("Ship Friday"), not a discussion point
DiscussionThe context and trade-offs behind each decision, condensed
Next stepsEvery action item, phrased "[Owner] will [do X] by [when]"

Attach the notes to the meeting record so they live where the team already looks for them.

Step 4 — Resolve an owner for each action item

SignalRouting
Owner named explicitly in the transcript ("Sarah will handle the migration")Assign to that person
Owner implied by the ownership map (topic maps to a known area owner)Assign to the mapped owner
No explicit owner and no confident map matchDo not guess — flag it (Step 6)

Step 5 — File each resolved action item as a Linear ticket

Create one ticket per action item in {{linear_team}}: title is the action phrased as a task, description is the decision/discussion context plus a link back to the meeting record, assignee is the owner resolved in Step 4.

Step 6 — Flag what you can't confidently assign

File any action item without a confident owner as an unassigned ticket in {{linear_team}}, with the ambiguity spelled out in the description ("raised by X, no clear owner — needs triage") instead of guessing an assignee.

Step 7 — Stop once notes and tickets are filed

Once the notes are attached and every action item is either filed-and-assigned or filed-and-flagged, the session is done. Don't touch any ticket that already existed before this meeting.

</workflow> <guardrails> - **Only create.** The agent never closes, reassigns, or edits a ticket that existed before this session — Linear writes are new tickets only. - **Flag instead of guess.** An action item without a confident owner is filed unassigned with the ambiguity noted, never routed to a person on a guess. - **One meeting, one session.** Nothing carries over between meetings; a call is scoped entirely to its own event and transcript. - **Scoped secrets.** Calendar, Drive, and Linear access is brokered through connectors; no raw credential reaches the model or a log. - **No chat posts.** The meeting record and Linear are the only outputs — this skill does not post to Slack, email, or any other channel. </guardrails> </skill>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Policy runbook for turning a Slack access request into a least-privilege, policy-checked GitHub or AWS IAM grant. Covers the role-to-grant mapping, extra-scrutiny cases, the approval handshake, and how an applied grant gets logged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Get a complete picture of any company or person before outreach. This skill always works with web search, and gets significantly better with enrichment and CRM data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Daily read-only ad-performance runbook — budget pacing, CPA/ROAS drift, underperforming ads and keywords, and anomaly detection across Google Ads and Meta Ads, plus how to rank and word optimization recommendations for {{alert_channel}}.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Extraction, PO matching, duplicate detection, and overcharge tolerance for processing incoming vendor invoices from {{invoice_label}} against the POs and ledger in {{ap_ledger}}. Load this before extracting a single invoice so every one is checked to the same standard and only genuine exceptions reach a human, with no invoice ever scheduled for payment by the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

Daily brand-mention monitoring loop for {{brand_terms}}. Searches news, social platforms, and forums for new mentions, dedupes against the ledger of mentions already reported, classifies sentiment and notability, and posts a digest with suggested response drafts to {{slack_channel}} — never posts, replies, or comments anywhere.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月13日 更新

kortix-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する