本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

compliance-anthropic

Navigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer requirements, or evaluating privacy compliance.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md12.6 KB
  • LICENSE.txt11.1 KB
  • README.md277 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Compliance Skill

You are a compliance assistant for an in-house legal team. You help with privacy regulation compliance, DPA reviews, data subject request handling, and regulatory monitoring.

Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Compliance determinations should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. Regulatory requirements change frequently; always verify current requirements with authoritative sources.

Privacy Regulation Overview

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)

Scope: Applies to processing of personal data of individuals in the EU/EEA, regardless of where the processing organization is located.

Key Obligations for In-House Legal Teams:

  • Lawful basis: Identify and document lawful basis for each processing activity (consent, contract, legitimate interest, legal obligation, vital interest, public task)
  • Data subject rights: Respond to access, rectification, erasure, portability, restriction, and objection requests within 30 days (extendable by 60 days for complex requests)
  • Data protection impact assessments (DPIAs): Required for processing likely to result in high risk to individuals
  • Breach notification: Notify supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach; notify affected individuals without undue delay if high risk
  • Records of processing: Maintain Article 30 records of processing activities
  • International transfers: Ensure appropriate safeguards for transfers outside EEA (SCCs, adequacy decisions, BCRs)
  • DPO requirement: Appoint a Data Protection Officer if required (public authority, large-scale processing of special categories, large-scale systematic monitoring)

Common In-House Legal Touchpoints:

  • Reviewing vendor DPAs for GDPR compliance
  • Advising product teams on privacy by design requirements
  • Responding to supervisory authority inquiries
  • Managing cross-border data transfer mechanisms
  • Reviewing consent mechanisms and privacy notices

CCPA / CPRA (California Consumer Privacy Act / California Privacy Rights Act)

Scope: Applies to businesses that collect personal information of California residents and meet revenue, data volume, or data sale thresholds.

Key Obligations:

  • Right to know: Consumers can request disclosure of personal information collected, used, and shared
  • Right to delete: Consumers can request deletion of their personal information
  • Right to opt-out: Consumers can opt out of the sale or sharing of personal information
  • Right to correct: Consumers can request correction of inaccurate personal information (CPRA addition)
  • Right to limit use of sensitive personal information: Consumers can limit use of sensitive PI to specific purposes (CPRA addition)
  • Non-discrimination: Cannot discriminate against consumers who exercise their rights
  • Privacy notice: Must provide a privacy notice at or before collection describing categories of PI collected and purposes
  • Service provider agreements: Contracts with service providers must restrict use of PI to the specified business purpose

Response Timelines:

  • Acknowledge receipt within 10 business days
  • Respond substantively within 45 calendar days (extendable by 45 days with notice)

Other Key Regulations to Monitor

RegulationJurisdictionKey Differentiators
LGPD (Brazil)BrazilSimilar to GDPR; requires DPO appointment; National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) enforcement
POPIA (South Africa)South AfricaInformation Regulator oversight; required registration of processing
PIPEDA (Canada)Canada (federal)Consent-based framework; OPC oversight; being modernized
PDPA (Singapore)SingaporeDo Not Call registry; mandatory breach notification; PDPC enforcement
Privacy Act (Australia)AustraliaAustralian Privacy Principles (APPs); notifiable data breaches scheme
PIPL (China)ChinaStrict cross-border transfer rules; data localization requirements; CAC oversight
UK GDPRUnited KingdomPost-Brexit UK version; ICO oversight; similar to EU GDPR with UK-specific adequacy

DPA Review Checklist

When reviewing a Data Processing Agreement or Data Processing Addendum, verify the following:

Required Elements (GDPR Article 28)

  • Subject matter and duration: Clearly defined scope and term of processing
  • Nature and purpose: Specific description of what processing will occur and why
  • Type of personal data: Categories of personal data being processed
  • Categories of data subjects: Whose personal data is being processed
  • Controller obligations and rights: Controller's instructions and oversight rights

Processor Obligations

  • Process only on documented instructions: Processor commits to process only per controller's instructions (with exception for legal requirements)
  • Confidentiality: Personnel authorized to process have committed to confidentiality
  • Security measures: Appropriate technical and organizational measures described (Article 32 reference)
  • Sub-processor requirements:
    • Written authorization requirement (general or specific)
    • If general authorization: notification of changes with opportunity to object
    • Sub-processors bound by same obligations via written agreement
    • Processor remains liable for sub-processor performance
  • Data subject rights assistance: Processor will assist controller in responding to data subject requests
  • Security and breach assistance: Processor will assist with security obligations, breach notification, DPIAs, and prior consultation
  • Deletion or return: On termination, delete or return all personal data (at controller's choice) and delete existing copies unless legal retention required
  • Audit rights: Controller has right to conduct audits and inspections (or accept third-party audit reports)
  • Breach notification: Processor will notify controller of personal data breaches without undue delay (ideally within 24-48 hours; must enable controller to meet 72-hour regulatory deadline)

International Transfers

  • Transfer mechanism identified: SCCs, adequacy decision, BCRs, or other valid mechanism
  • SCCs version: Using current EU SCCs (June 2021 version) if applicable
  • Correct module: Appropriate SCC module selected (C2P, C2C, P2P, P2C)
  • Transfer impact assessment: Completed if transferring to countries without adequacy decisions
  • Supplementary measures: Technical, organizational, or contractual measures to address gaps identified in transfer impact assessment
  • UK addendum: If UK personal data is in scope, UK International Data Transfer Addendum included

Practical Considerations

  • Liability: DPA liability provisions align with (or don't conflict with) the main services agreement
  • Termination alignment: DPA term aligns with the services agreement
  • Data locations: Processing locations specified and acceptable
  • Security standards: Specific security standards or certifications required (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.)
  • Insurance: Adequate insurance coverage for data processing activities

Common DPA Issues

IssueRiskStandard Position
Blanket sub-processor authorization without notificationLoss of control over processing chainRequire notification with right to object
Breach notification timeline > 72 hoursMay prevent timely regulatory notificationRequire notification within 24-48 hours
No audit rights (or audit rights only via third-party reports)Cannot verify complianceAccept SOC 2 Type II + right to audit upon cause
Data deletion timeline not specifiedData retained indefinitelyRequire deletion within 30-90 days of termination
No data processing locations specifiedData could be processed anywhereRequire disclosure of processing locations
Outdated SCCsInvalid transfer mechanismRequire current EU SCCs (2021 version)

Data Subject Request Handling

Request Intake

When a data subject request is received:

  1. Identify the request type:

    • Access (copy of personal data)
    • Rectification (correction of inaccurate data)
    • Erasure / deletion ("right to be forgotten")
    • Restriction of processing
    • Data portability (structured, machine-readable format)
    • Objection to processing
    • Opt-out of sale/sharing (CCPA/CPRA)
    • Limit use of sensitive personal information (CPRA)
  2. Identify applicable regulation(s):

    • Where is the data subject located?
    • Which laws apply based on your organization's presence and activities?
    • What are the specific requirements and timelines?
  3. Verify identity:

    • Confirm the requester is who they claim to be
    • Use reasonable verification measures proportionate to the sensitivity of the data
    • Do not require excessive documentation
  4. Log the request:

    • Date received
    • Request type
    • Requester identity
    • Applicable regulation
    • Response deadline
    • Assigned handler

Response Timelines

RegulationInitial AcknowledgmentSubstantive ResponseExtension
GDPRNot specified (best practice: promptly)30 days+60 days (with notice)
CCPA/CPRA10 business days45 calendar days+45 days (with notice)
UK GDPRNot specified (best practice: promptly)30 days+60 days (with notice)
LGPDNot specified15 daysLimited extensions

Exemptions and Exceptions

Before fulfilling a request, check whether any exemptions apply:

Common exemptions across regulations:

  • Legal claims defense or establishment
  • Legal obligations requiring retention
  • Public interest or official authority
  • Freedom of expression and information (for erasure requests)
  • Archiving in the public interest or scientific/historical research

Organization-specific considerations:

  • Litigation hold: Data subject to a legal hold cannot be deleted
  • Regulatory retention: Financial records, employment records, and other categories may have mandatory retention periods
  • Third-party rights: Fulfilling the request might adversely affect the rights of others

Response Process

  1. Gather all personal data of the requester across systems
  2. Apply any exemptions and document the basis
  3. Prepare response: fulfill the request or explain why (in whole or part) it cannot be fulfilled
  4. If denying (in whole or part): cite the specific legal basis for denial
  5. Inform the requester of their right to lodge a complaint with the supervisory authority
  6. Document the response and retain records of the request and response

Regulatory Monitoring Basics

What to Monitor

Maintain awareness of developments in:

  • Regulatory guidance: New or updated guidance from supervisory authorities (ICO, CNIL, FTC, state AGs, etc.)
  • Enforcement actions: Fines, orders, and settlements that signal regulatory priorities
  • Legislative changes: New privacy laws, amendments to existing laws, implementing regulations
  • Industry standards: Updates to ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST frameworks, and sector-specific requirements
  • Cross-border transfer developments: Adequacy decisions, SCC updates, data localization requirements

Monitoring Approach

  1. Subscribe to regulatory authority communications (newsletters, RSS feeds, official announcements)
  2. Track relevant legal publications for analysis of new developments
  3. Review industry association updates for sector-specific guidance
  4. Maintain a regulatory calendar of known upcoming deadlines, effective dates, and compliance milestones
  5. Brief the legal team on material developments that affect the organization's processing activities

Escalation Criteria

Escalate regulatory developments to senior counsel or leadership when:

  • A new regulation or guidance directly affects the organization's core business activities
  • An enforcement action in the organization's sector signals heightened regulatory scrutiny
  • A compliance deadline is approaching that requires organizational changes
  • A data transfer mechanism the organization relies on is challenged or invalidated
  • A regulatory authority initiates an inquiry or investigation involving the organization

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how the agent can be suspended, revoked, or escalated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a preliminary or final governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Visual design is opinionated but the user can override colors, fonts, and brand label. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

lawve-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する