本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

mcp-builder

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(11)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • LICENSE.txt11.1 KB
  • README.md289 B
  • reference/evaluation.md21.2 KB
  • reference/mcp_best_practices.md7.2 KB
  • reference/node_mcp_server.md27.9 KB
  • reference/python_mcp_server.md24.5 KB
  • scripts/connections.py4.8 KB
  • scripts/evaluation.py12.3 KB
  • scripts/example_evaluation.xml1.2 KB
  • scripts/requirements.txt29 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

MCP Server Development Guide

Overview

Create MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. The quality of an MCP server is measured by how well it enables LLMs to accomplish real-world tasks.


Process

🚀 High-Level Workflow

Creating a high-quality MCP server involves four main phases:

Phase 1: Deep Research and Planning

1.1 Understand Modern MCP Design

API Coverage vs. Workflow Tools: Balance comprehensive API endpoint coverage with specialized workflow tools. Workflow tools can be more convenient for specific tasks, while comprehensive coverage gives agents flexibility to compose operations. Performance varies by client—some clients benefit from code execution that combines basic tools, while others work better with higher-level workflows. When uncertain, prioritize comprehensive API coverage.

Tool Naming and Discoverability: Clear, descriptive tool names help agents find the right tools quickly. Use consistent prefixes (e.g., github_create_issue, github_list_repos) and action-oriented naming.

Context Management: Agents benefit from concise tool descriptions and the ability to filter/paginate results. Design tools that return focused, relevant data. Some clients support code execution which can help agents filter and process data efficiently.

Actionable Error Messages: Error messages should guide agents toward solutions with specific suggestions and next steps.

1.2 Study MCP Protocol Documentation

Navigate the MCP specification:

Start with the sitemap to find relevant pages: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/sitemap.xml

Then fetch specific pages with .md suffix for markdown format (e.g., https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft.md).

Key pages to review:

  • Specification overview and architecture
  • Transport mechanisms (streamable HTTP, stdio)
  • Tool, resource, and prompt definitions

1.3 Study Framework Documentation

Recommended stack:

  • Language: TypeScript (high-quality SDK support and good compatibility in many execution environments e.g. MCPB. Plus AI models are good at generating TypeScript code, benefiting from its broad usage, static typing and good linting tools)
  • Transport: Streamable HTTP for remote servers, using stateless JSON (simpler to scale and maintain, as opposed to stateful sessions and streaming responses). stdio for local servers.

Load framework documentation:

For TypeScript (recommended):

  • TypeScript SDK: Use WebFetch to load https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/main/README.md
  • ⚡ TypeScript Guide - TypeScript patterns and examples

For Python:

  • Python SDK: Use WebFetch to load https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/main/README.md
  • 🐍 Python Guide - Python patterns and examples

1.4 Plan Your Implementation

Understand the API: Review the service's API documentation to identify key endpoints, authentication requirements, and data models. Use web search and WebFetch as needed.

Tool Selection: Prioritize comprehensive API coverage. List endpoints to implement, starting with the most common operations.


Phase 2: Implementation

2.1 Set Up Project Structure

See language-specific guides for project setup:

2.2 Implement Core Infrastructure

Create shared utilities:

  • API client with authentication
  • Error handling helpers
  • Response formatting (JSON/Markdown)
  • Pagination support

2.3 Implement Tools

For each tool:

Input Schema:

  • Use Zod (TypeScript) or Pydantic (Python)
  • Include constraints and clear descriptions
  • Add examples in field descriptions

Output Schema:

  • Define outputSchema where possible for structured data
  • Use structuredContent in tool responses (TypeScript SDK feature)
  • Helps clients understand and process tool outputs

Tool Description:

  • Concise summary of functionality
  • Parameter descriptions
  • Return type schema

Implementation:

  • Async/await for I/O operations
  • Proper error handling with actionable messages
  • Support pagination where applicable
  • Return both text content and structured data when using modern SDKs

Annotations:

  • readOnlyHint: true/false
  • destructiveHint: true/false
  • idempotentHint: true/false
  • openWorldHint: true/false

Phase 3: Review and Test

3.1 Code Quality

Review for:

  • No duplicated code (DRY principle)
  • Consistent error handling
  • Full type coverage
  • Clear tool descriptions

3.2 Build and Test

TypeScript:

  • Run npm run build to verify compilation
  • Test with MCP Inspector: npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector

Python:

  • Verify syntax: python -m py_compile your_server.py
  • Test with MCP Inspector

See language-specific guides for detailed testing approaches and quality checklists.


Phase 4: Create Evaluations

After implementing your MCP server, create comprehensive evaluations to test its effectiveness.

Load ✅ Evaluation Guide for complete evaluation guidelines.

4.1 Understand Evaluation Purpose

Use evaluations to test whether LLMs can effectively use your MCP server to answer realistic, complex questions.

4.2 Create 10 Evaluation Questions

To create effective evaluations, follow the process outlined in the evaluation guide:

  1. Tool Inspection: List available tools and understand their capabilities
  2. Content Exploration: Use READ-ONLY operations to explore available data
  3. Question Generation: Create 10 complex, realistic questions
  4. Answer Verification: Solve each question yourself to verify answers

4.3 Evaluation Requirements

Ensure each question is:

  • Independent: Not dependent on other questions
  • Read-only: Only non-destructive operations required
  • Complex: Requiring multiple tool calls and deep exploration
  • Realistic: Based on real use cases humans would care about
  • Verifiable: Single, clear answer that can be verified by string comparison
  • Stable: Answer won't change over time

4.4 Output Format

Create an XML file with this structure:

<evaluation>
  <qa_pair>
    <question>Find discussions about AI model launches with animal codenames. One model needed a specific safety designation that uses the format ASL-X. What number X was being determined for the model named after a spotted wild cat?</question>
    <answer>3</answer>
  </qa_pair>
<!-- More qa_pairs... -->
</evaluation>

Reference Files

📚 Documentation Library

Load these resources as needed during development:

Core MCP Documentation (Load First)

  • MCP Protocol: Start with sitemap at https://modelcontextprotocol.io/sitemap.xml, then fetch specific pages with .md suffix
  • 📋 MCP Best Practices - Universal MCP guidelines including:
    • Server and tool naming conventions
    • Response format guidelines (JSON vs Markdown)
    • Pagination best practices
    • Transport selection (streamable HTTP vs stdio)
    • Security and error handling standards

SDK Documentation (Load During Phase 1/2)

  • Python SDK: Fetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/main/README.md
  • TypeScript SDK: Fetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/main/README.md

Language-Specific Implementation Guides (Load During Phase 2)

  • 🐍 Python Implementation Guide - Complete Python/FastMCP guide with:

    • Server initialization patterns
    • Pydantic model examples
    • Tool registration with @mcp.tool
    • Complete working examples
    • Quality checklist
  • ⚡ TypeScript Implementation Guide - Complete TypeScript guide with:

    • Project structure
    • Zod schema patterns
    • Tool registration with server.registerTool
    • Complete working examples
    • Quality checklist

Evaluation Guide (Load During Phase 4)

  • ✅ Evaluation Guide - Complete evaluation creation guide with:
    • Question creation guidelines
    • Answer verification strategies
    • XML format specifications
    • Example questions and answers
    • Running an evaluation with the provided scripts

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how the agent can be suspended, revoked, or escalated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a preliminary or final governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Visual design is opinionated but the user can override colors, fonts, and brand label. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8632026年10月3日 更新

lawve-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する