AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
IOC export formats and procedures. CSV, STIX 2.1, OpenIOC, MISP. Handles format conversion and packaging, and carries per-claim evidence grades (access level and claim support) from /quality-of-information-check into each format (STIX confidence, MISP attribute tags).
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Standard tabular format. Most broadly compatible.
indicator,type,first_seen,last_seen,confidence,access_level,claim_support,tlp,source,source_url,context,mitre_attack,tags
203.0.113.42,ipv4-addr,2026-01-15,2026-03-20,70,direct,firm,GREEN,"Mandiant report MAL-2026-001",https://vendor.example.com/mal-2026-001,C2 server for SUNBURST variant,T1071.001,"apt29;sunburst"
evil.example.com,domain-name,2026-02-01,2026-03-20,50,limited,tentative,GREEN,"Internal analysis",,"Phishing landing page",T1566.002,"phishing;apt29"
Column definitions:
| Column | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| indicator | Yes | The IOC value |
| type | Yes | STIX indicator type: ipv4-addr, ipv6-addr, domain-name, url, file:hashes.SHA-256, file:hashes.MD5, email-addr |
| first_seen | Yes | ISO date first observed |
| last_seen | No | ISO date last observed |
| confidence | Yes | 0-100. When the row comes from a graded claim, derived from claim support (see Grades on export). Empty for unverified |
| access_level | No | How the source knows: direct, limited, indirect, untraced or adversary |
| claim_support | No | What backs the claim: established, firm, tentative, disputed or unverified |
| tlp | Yes | TLP marking |
| source | Yes | Source description. The primary source, not the outlet that relayed it |
| source_url | No | URL of the primary source |
| context | No | What the IOC represents (C2, phishing, etc.) |
| mitre_attack | No | ATT&CK technique IDs |
| tags | No | Semicolon-separated tags |
A row is one claim about one indicator. If two primaries make different assertions about the same value, that is two rows, each with its own grade.
See stix-bundle skill for full specification, including which object carries confidence (never the SCO), the x_liberty91_access_level and x_liberty91_claim_support properties and a worked example.
Mandiant's legacy IOC format. Still used by some tools.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ioc xmlns="http://schemas.mandiant.com/2010/ioc" id="[UUID]" last-modified="YYYY-MM-DDT00:00:00">
<short_description>IOC Title</short_description>
<description>Description</description>
<authored_by>CTI Platform</authored_by>
<authored_date>YYYY-MM-DDT00:00:00</authored_date>
<definition>
<Indicator operator="OR" id="[UUID]">
<IndicatorItem id="[UUID]" condition="is">
<Context document="Network" search="Network/DNS" type="mir"/>
<Content type="string">evil.example.com</Content>
</IndicatorItem>
<IndicatorItem id="[UUID]" condition="is">
<Context document="FileItem" search="FileItem/Md5sum" type="mir"/>
<Content type="md5">abc123...</Content>
</IndicatorItem>
</Indicator>
</definition>
</ioc>
For import into MISP instances.
{
"Event": {
"info": "IOC collection: [context]",
"threat_level_id": "2",
"analysis": "2",
"distribution": "1",
"Tag": [
{"name": "tlp:green"},
{"name": "misp-galaxy:mitre-attack-pattern=\"Phishing - T1566\""}
],
"Attribute": [
{
"type": "ip-dst",
"category": "Network activity",
"value": "203.0.113.42",
"to_ids": true,
"comment": "C2 server",
"Tag": [
{"name": "cti-skills:access-level=\"direct\""},
{"name": "cti-skills:claim-support=\"firm\""},
{"name": "misp:confidence-level=\"usually-confident\""}
]
},
{
"type": "domain",
"category": "Network activity",
"value": "evil.example.com",
"to_ids": true,
"comment": "Phishing landing page",
"Tag": [
{"name": "cti-skills:access-level=\"limited\""},
{"name": "cti-skills:claim-support=\"tentative\""},
{"name": "misp:confidence-level=\"fairly-confident\""}
]
}
]
}
}
Applies when the IOCs come with evidence items from /quality-of-information-check. Grades are exported per claim, never per event: each indicator carries the grade of the claim it came from.
The evidence grade is two words, access level and claim support. It is not the Admiralty scale and is never exported under Admiralty labels. Admiralty ratings apply to lookup results and single items; the evidence grade applies to claims from documents; neither is converted into the other.
| Claim support | STIX confidence | MISP confidence tag |
|---|---|---|
| established | 90 | misp:confidence-level="completely-confident" |
| firm | 70 | misp:confidence-level="usually-confident" |
| tentative | 50 | misp:confidence-level="fairly-confident" |
| disputed | 30 | misp:confidence-level="rarely-confident" |
| unverified | property omitted | misp:confidence-level="confidence-cannot-be-evaluated" |
The STIX values are the pack's own mapping, chosen to sit inside the bands of /confidence-levels (High 80 to 100, Moderate 60 to 79, Low 40 to 59). The MISP confidence tag is derived from claim support. It is not a separate judgement.
MISP tags, at attribute level. Each attribute gets three tags:
cti-skills:access-level="direct", or "limited", "indirect", "untraced", "adversary"cti-skills:claim-support="established", or "firm", "tentative", "disputed", "unverified"misp:confidence-level tag from the tableThe cti-skills: tags are plain tags. They belong to no MISP taxonomy. Do not tag graded claims with the admiralty-scale taxonomy. The misp:confidence-level strings were verified on 2026-09-27 against misp/machinetag.json (version 14) in github.com/MISP/misp-taxonomies.
Event-level tags. Optional. If set, they are the weakest link, the grade of the lowest-graded load-bearing claim, never an average. They are there for consumers that filter on event tags. The attribute tags are the record.
Pushing to MISP. The target instance needs the misp taxonomy enabled, and the account needs permission to create the cti-skills: tags if they do not exist yet. /lookup-misp add-attribute --tags applies them per attribute. Quote the whole list for the shell, since the tag names contain double quotes and commas separate tags. Do not rely on upload-stix to turn STIX confidence into these tags. That conversion is not verified here, so tag the attributes explicitly.
Import. Reading graded data in, a STIX confidence or a misp:confidence-level tag becomes claim support with the table below. An imported value never gives established, since that level needs counted independent primaries (rubric rule R5).
STIX confidence | MISP confidence tag | Claim support |
|---|---|---|
| 60 to 100 | completely-confident, usually-confident | firm |
| 40 to 59 | fairly-confident | tentative |
| 1 to 39 | rarely-confident, unconfident | disputed |
| absent or 0 | confidence-cannot-be-evaluated, or no tag | unverified |
Access level for an imported item is indirect unless the primary is resolved. The item is flagged derived_from_confidence, so /quality-of-information-check re-grades it when a primary is available (rubric rule R11).
An Admiralty rating that arrives on imported data, for example admiralty-scale tags set by another organisation, is kept as that party's Admiralty rating and shown as such. It is not converted into an evidence grade.
Ungraded IOCs. Without evidence items, set confidence per the confidence-levels skill and leave the access_level and claim_support columns and the cti-skills: tags off. Do not invent a grade to fill the column.
| IOC Type | MISP attribute type | Category |
|---|---|---|
| IPv4 address | ip-dst / ip-src | Network activity |
| IPv6 address | ip-dst / ip-src | Network activity |
| Domain | domain | Network activity |
| URL | url | Network activity |
| Email address | email-src | Payload delivery |
| SHA-256 hash | sha256 | Payload delivery |
| MD5 hash | md5 | Payload delivery |
| SHA-1 hash | sha1 | Payload delivery |
| Filename | filename | Payload delivery |
| Registry key | regkey | Persistence mechanism |
| Mutex | mutex | Artifacts dropped |
data/exports/YYYY-MM-DD-<context>.<format>Write exports to: data/exports/
YYYY-MM-DD-<context>.csvdata/stix-bundles/YYYY-MM-DD-<context>.jsonYYYY-MM-DD-<context>.iocYYYY-MM-DD-<context>.misp.jsonまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when documenting a named campaign across time and victims, the user asks to start or update a campaign record, or another skill identified a multi-incident cluster that warrants formal tracking. Provides the template (timeline, attribution, victimology, attack chain, Diamond Model mapping, IOC clusters) and the lifecycle from active to historical.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about carding, BIN attacks, payment-card breach markets, fullz/CVV2 trade, autoshops (BidenCash, Brian's Club, Russianmarket, B1ack's Stash), or financial-fraud TTPs. Self-updating knowledge cell.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Censys API v2 reference. Host reconnaissance and certificate data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about Chinese state-sponsored cyber operations or specific PRC-aligned actors (APT41, Volt Typhoon, Mustang Panda, APT10, APT31, Salt Typhoon, etc.), MSS/PLA-attributed campaigns, or PRC sector targeting. Self-updating knowledge cell.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。