実際の製品を操作して、利用者が確認できる動作証拠を集め、検証計画に沿った受け入れレポートとして公開するスキルです。
- 変更後の製品動作を実地で検証したいとき
- 画面キャプチャなどの証拠を集めたいとき
- 検証計画とレポートを作成したいとき
Drizzle ORMでテーブルやインデックス、型を定義し、JOINや集計を含むクエリをスキーマに沿って書くための指針をまとめたスキルです。
Use for Drizzle schemas and queries: tables, indexes, relations, joins and inferred types. Rollout belongs to db-migrations.
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るDrizzle ORMを使ったデータベーススキーマとクエリの書き方を確認できます。テーブルや列の命名、主キー・外部キー、インデックス、タイムスタンプ、JSONBの型付けなど、スキーマを定義するときのルールを示します。新しいテーブルでは単一列の主キーを使い、業務上の一意性はユニークインデックスで表す方針です。クエリはdb.select()ビルダーを基本とし、JOINや集計、CTEなどを使う例もあります。Drizzleで表現しにくい再帰CTEなどでは、スキーマ参照を保ちながらraw SQLを使う考え方も説明します。
データベースのモデルやリポジトリを追加するとき、既存のスキーマ規約に合わせたいとき、あるいはdb.query.*を使った処理を明示的なSELECTやJOINに見直したいときに役立ちます。マイグレーションの手順そのものは対象外で、詳細はdb-migrationsスキルを参照します。
新しいモデルやリポジトリには、同じ変更内で対応するテストが必要です。
この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(OpenAI Codex)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。
SKILL.md の記述から、注意が要る操作と導入の前提を AI が確認しました。点数は実際に動かした結果(実行検証)だけで付けています。
点数には入れていません。 2026年10月26日 時点で AI(OpenAI Codex)が判定しました。目安なので、入れる前に原文も確認してください。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Adding a Model or Repository? Ship a sibling test in the same PR — every new file under
packages/database/src/models/**orsrc/repositories/**needs a matching__tests__/<name>.test.ts. See the testing skill (.agents/skills/testing/references/db-model-test.md) for thegetTestDB()integration pattern, user-isolation tests, the BM25describe.skipIf(!isServerDB)guard, and schema gotchas. CI's coverage patch gate won't reliably catch a brand-new untested file, so this is on you.
drizzle.config.tspackages/database/src/schemas/packages/database/migrations/postgresql with strict: trueLocation: packages/database/src/schemas/_helpers.ts
timestamptz(name): Timestamp with timezonecreatedAt(), updatedAt(), accessedAt(): Standard timestamp columnstimestamps: Object with all three for easy spreadusers, session_groups)user_id, created_at)user_xxx_logs, the workspace-scoped counterpart should be
workspace_xxx_logs, not workspace_xxx_records or another new synonym.// ✅ Good: follows the existing user/workspace table family (names are
// illustrative — swap `widget` for the real noun).
export const userWidgetLogs = pgTable('user_widget_logs', { ... });
export const workspaceWidgetLogs = pgTable('workspace_widget_logs', { ... });
// ❌ Bad: introduces a new suffix for the same concept.
export const workspaceWidgetRecords = pgTable('workspace_widget_records', { ... });
Do not use auto-incrementing primary keys (serial, bigserial, generated
identity columns). They create sequence-state problems during cross-database
migrations, restores, and data copy jobs. Prefer text IDs from application
generators (idGenerator, createNanoId) or uuid for internal tables.
Keep $defaultFn(...) when a table normally owns ID generation. Callers can
still pass an explicit id; the default only runs when the insert omits it. Do
not remove the default just because one flow needs to supply a request-scoped ID.
// ✅ Good: app-generated text ID; explicit inserts can still override it.
id: text('id')
.primaryKey()
.$defaultFn(() => idGenerator('agents'))
.notNull(),
// ❌ Bad: sequence state is fragile across DB migrations and restores.
id: serial('id').primaryKey(),
ID prefixes make entity types distinguishable. For internal tables, use uuid.
Do not use composite primary keys on new tables. Give every table a single-column
surrogate PK and carry business uniqueness in a uniqueIndex instead. PK columns
cannot be nullable, so when the uniqueness scope later grows by a nullable
dimension the composite PK must be torn down and rebuilt — exactly what happened
when ai_providers / ai_models were workspace-scoped (migrations 0110–0111 replaced
their composite PKs with a surrogate _id plus partial unique indexes). A unique
index still works as the arbiter for onConflictDoUpdate upserts.
// ✅ Good: surrogate PK; uniqueness scope can evolve without a PK rebuild.
export const workspaceUserSettings = pgTable(
'workspace_user_settings',
{
id: uuid('id').defaultRandom().notNull().primaryKey(),
workspaceId: text('workspace_id').references(() => workspaces.id, { onDelete: 'cascade' }).notNull(),
userId: text('user_id').references(() => users.id, { onDelete: 'cascade' }).notNull(),
...timestamps,
},
(t) => [uniqueIndex('workspace_user_settings_workspace_id_user_id_unique').on(t.workspaceId, t.userId)],
);
// ❌ Bad: locked to exactly these columns; adding a nullable scope column
// (workspaceId, deviceId, …) later forces a full PK rebuild migration.
(t) => [primaryKey({ columns: [t.workspaceId, t.userId] })],
Existing composite PKs are legacy — leave them alone unless they block a scope change, then migrate them the 0110–0111 way.
userId: text('user_id')
.references(() => users.id, { onDelete: 'cascade' })
.notNull(),
...timestamps, // Spread from _helpers.ts
Do not introduce artificial sentinel strings for missing values, such as
unknown, unless the domain already has that explicit state and existing code
uses it consistently. Prefer nullable columns, optional TypeScript fields, or a
separate concrete status enum when the value is genuinely absent.
// ✅ Good: absent until a custom-execution attempt actually runs
// (packages/database/src/schemas/agentIntervention.ts).
export const AGENT_INTERVENTION_CUSTOM_EXECUTION_STATES = ['pending', 'executing', 'completed'] as const;
export type AgentInterventionCustomExecutionState =
(typeof AGENT_INTERVENTION_CUSTOM_EXECUTION_STATES)[number];
customExecutionState: text('custom_execution_state').$type<AgentInterventionCustomExecutionState>(),
// ❌ Bad: invents a new state that callers now need to handle everywhere.
export type AgentInterventionCustomExecutionState = 'pending' | 'executing' | 'completed' | 'unknown';
customExecutionState: text('custom_execution_state')
.$type<AgentInterventionCustomExecutionState>()
.notNull()
.default('unknown');
Default to not using PostgreSQL/Drizzle pgEnum. Database enums are
expensive to evolve safely: adding members needs migrations, removing or
renaming members is awkward, and deployment order becomes more fragile.
For product/business states, use text() or varchar() with a TypeScript value
type via $type<...>(). Keep those TS-only value types in the domain/shared type
module, then import them into the schema. For cloud DB schemas, that usually
means cloudDB/types.ts.
Do not copy existing DB enums as a pattern. Treat them as legacy or explicitly
reviewed exceptions. If a new pgEnum seems necessary, stop and justify why the
value set is effectively immutable and why the migration cost is acceptable.
For columns whose meaning is not obvious from the name alone, add JSDoc on the schema field. Include a concrete example when it clarifies the stored value or the lifecycle moment that writes it. This is especially important for external IDs, lifecycle statuses, denormalized snapshots, JSONB signals, and fields whose name could mean either a request ID or a persisted row ID.
// ✅ Good: explain the table's business object first, then only document
// non-obvious lifecycle fields
// (packages/database/src/schemas/agentIntervention.ts).
/**
* Private resolution/outbox records. Unlike `agent_interventions`, this table
* may retain user-edited arguments so a claimed decision can be delivered
* reliably after the app disconnects. It is never a notification payload.
*/
export const agentInterventionResolutions = pgTable('agent_intervention_resolutions', {
/** Owner of the durable operation, distinct from the resolving actor. */
userId: text('user_id').references(() => users.id, { onDelete: 'cascade' }).notNull(),
/** Private executor result; never selected into Review or notification DTOs. */
customExecutionResult: jsonb('custom_execution_result').$type<AgentInterventionCustomExecutionResult>(),
/** Monotonic lease attempt, starting at zero while pending. */
customExecutionAttempt: integer('custom_execution_attempt'),
});
// ❌ Bad: comments restate obvious column names without adding domain meaning.
/** User email */
email: text('email'),
Avoid Record<string, unknown> or similarly loose JSONB types for schema
columns. Define a concrete interface that describes the expected JSON shape, even
when most properties are optional. This keeps callers, migrations, and review
queries aligned on the same data contract.
// packages/types/src/agent/agentIntervention.ts +
// packages/database/src/schemas/agentIntervention.ts
interface AgentInterventionCustomExecutionResult {
content: string;
pluginState: Record<string, unknown>;
}
customExecutionResult: jsonb('custom_execution_result').$type<AgentInterventionCustomExecutionResult>(),
// ❌ Bad: hides the contract and makes downstream access untyped.
customExecutionResult: jsonb('custom_execution_result').$type<Record<string, unknown>>(),
A loosely-typed JSONB column is often a symptom of a deeper problem: the column
was reserved speculatively ("for future extension") and nothing actually writes
it. Don't add metadata / extra JSONB columns for hypothetical future needs —
a column earns its place only when a concrete writer ships alongside it. When
review finds such a column, the fix is to delete the column, not to invent
an interface for data that doesn't exist; add a properly-typed column once the
real requirement arrives.
// Return array (object style deprecated)
(t) => [uniqueIndex('client_id_user_id_unique').on(t.clientId, t.userId)],
export const insertAgentSchema = createInsertSchema(agents);
export type NewAgent = typeof agents.$inferInsert;
export type AgentItem = typeof agents.$inferSelect;
export const agents = pgTable(
'agents',
{
id: text('id')
.primaryKey()
.$defaultFn(() => idGenerator('agents'))
.notNull(),
slug: varchar('slug', { length: 100 })
.$defaultFn(() => randomSlug(4))
.unique(),
userId: text('user_id')
.references(() => users.id, { onDelete: 'cascade' })
.notNull(),
clientId: text('client_id'),
chatConfig: jsonb('chat_config').$type<LobeAgentChatConfig>(),
...timestamps,
},
(t) => [uniqueIndex('client_id_user_id_unique').on(t.clientId, t.userId)],
);
The surrogate-PK rule above applies to junction tables too — pair uniqueness
goes in a uniqueIndex, not a composite PK (many existing junction tables
still use composite PKs; that is legacy, not the template):
export const agentsKnowledgeBases = pgTable(
'agents_knowledge_bases',
{
id: uuid('id').defaultRandom().notNull().primaryKey(),
agentId: text('agent_id')
.references(() => agents.id, { onDelete: 'cascade' })
.notNull(),
knowledgeBaseId: text('knowledge_base_id')
.references(() => knowledgeBases.id, { onDelete: 'cascade' })
.notNull(),
userId: text('user_id')
.references(() => users.id, { onDelete: 'cascade' })
.notNull(),
enabled: boolean('enabled').default(true),
...timestamps,
},
(t) => [
uniqueIndex('agents_knowledge_bases_agent_id_knowledge_base_id_unique').on(
t.agentId,
t.knowledgeBaseId,
),
],
);
Always use db.select() builder API. Never use db.query.* relational API (findMany, findFirst, with:).
The relational API generates complex lateral joins with json_build_array that are fragile and hard to debug.
// ✅ Good
const [result] = await this.db.select().from(agents).where(eq(agents.id, id)).limit(1);
return result;
// ❌ Bad: relational API
return this.db.query.agents.findFirst({
where: eq(agents.id, id),
});
// ✅ Good: explicit select + leftJoin
const rows = await this.db
.select({
runId: agentEvalRunTopics.runId,
score: agentEvalRunTopics.score,
testCase: agentEvalTestCases,
topic: topics,
})
.from(agentEvalRunTopics)
.leftJoin(agentEvalTestCases, eq(agentEvalRunTopics.testCaseId, agentEvalTestCases.id))
.leftJoin(topics, eq(agentEvalRunTopics.topicId, topics.id))
.where(eq(agentEvalRunTopics.runId, runId))
.orderBy(asc(agentEvalRunTopics.createdAt));
// ❌ Bad: relational API with `with:`
return this.db.query.agentEvalRunTopics.findMany({
where: eq(agentEvalRunTopics.runId, runId),
with: { testCase: true, topic: true },
});
// ✅ Good: select + leftJoin + groupBy
const rows = await this.db
.select({
id: agentEvalDatasets.id,
name: agentEvalDatasets.name,
testCaseCount: count(agentEvalTestCases.id).as('testCaseCount'),
})
.from(agentEvalDatasets)
.leftJoin(agentEvalTestCases, eq(agentEvalDatasets.id, agentEvalTestCases.datasetId))
.groupBy(agentEvalDatasets.id);
Prefer Drizzle builders whenever the query reads clearly with select,
insert().select(), update().from(), joins, CTEs, and groupBy — this keeps
table/column references tied to schema, so changes surface as TypeScript errors.
Within a builder, expression-level sql<T> is fine for features lacking a helper
(JSON path, casts, aggregates, CASE, NOW()). Row locks are clauses, not
expressions — use .for('update'), never raw FOR UPDATE.
Use COALESCE only when null-handling is part of required DB semantics (nullable
JSONB append/merge, "keep first non-null"). Don't scatter
COALESCE(excluded.col, current.col) across ordinary upsert scalars just to avoid
an update object — build set from defined values only, and hide any remaining
SQL behind named helpers (appendJsonbArray, mergeJsonbObject, keepFirstValue)
so the method reads as business intent, not SQL plumbing.
// ✅ Scalars included only when present; SQL hidden behind a named helper.
// (`userWidgetLogs` is illustrative — swap for the real table.)
const updateValues = compactUndefined({
email: record.email ?? undefined,
ip: record.ip ?? undefined,
});
await db.insert(userWidgetLogs).values(values).onConflictDoUpdate({
set: { ...updateValues, events: appendJsonbArray(userWidgetLogs.events, event), updatedAt: now },
target: userWidgetLogs.id,
});
// ❌ Every scalar becomes SQL plumbing.
set: {
email: sql`COALESCE(excluded.email, ${userWidgetLogs.email})`,
ip: sql`COALESCE(excluded.ip, ${userWidgetLogs.ip})`,
}
When refactoring raw SQL:
execute.$with(...) + insert().select() / update().from() for multi-step
single-roundtrip writes Drizzle can express.execute<MyRow>(sql...) for safety — it types rows but doesn't keep
selected columns in sync with schema changes.Recursive CTEs are the canonical "keep raw" case — there's no clean WITH RECURSIVE
builder, and a rewrite would add depth-based roundtrips:
interface TaskTreeRow {
id: string;
parent_task_id: string | null;
}
// execute<T> acceptable: no clean WITH RECURSIVE builder. Keep schema refs in the
// interpolations and scope every leg to the user.
const { rows } = await db.execute<TaskTreeRow>(sql`
WITH RECURSIVE task_tree AS (
SELECT ${tasks.id}, ${tasks.parentTaskId}
FROM ${tasks}
WHERE ${tasks.id} = ${rootTaskId} AND ${tasks.createdByUserId} = ${userId}
UNION ALL
SELECT ${tasks.id}, ${tasks.parentTaskId}
FROM ${tasks}
JOIN task_tree ON ${tasks.parentTaskId} = task_tree.id
WHERE ${tasks.createdByUserId} = ${userId}
)
SELECT * FROM task_tree
`);
When you need a parent record with its children, use two queries instead of relational with::
// ✅ Good: two simple queries
const [dataset] = await this.db
.select()
.from(agentEvalDatasets)
.where(eq(agentEvalDatasets.id, id))
.limit(1);
if (!dataset) return undefined;
const testCases = await this.db
.select()
.from(agentEvalTestCases)
.where(eq(agentEvalTestCases.datasetId, id))
.orderBy(asc(agentEvalTestCases.sortOrder));
return { ...dataset, testCases };
See the db-migrations skill for the detailed migration guide.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
実際の製品を操作して、利用者が確認できる動作証拠を集め、検証計画に沿った受け入れレポートとして公開するスキルです。
LobeHubにAIモデルプロバイダーを追加し、実行時連携からモデル表示、設定、ブランド表記、文書化、動作確認まで進めるスキルです。
ユーザー設定の初期値をサーバー側の環境変数で切り替えるため、型定義や設定の組み立て、ユーザーストアへの反映、環境変数の例と説明書きを追加する手順です。
エージェント実行中の各段階をフックで監視し、ツール呼び出しの模擬・制御や人の承認、圧縮、サブエージェント処理に介入する仕組みを扱います。
イベントを起点にエージェントのバックグラウンド処理を組み立て、ソース・シグナル・アクション・ポリシーの役割分担や非同期連携を実装するためのスキルです。
DiscordやSlackなどの実際のチャットアプリでボットにメッセージを送り、応答を画面で確認する受け入れテストを行うスキルです。