本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

npm-supply-chain-check

Detect known malicious npm package versions and install-time supply-chain indicators in repositories, lockfiles, and node_modules. Use when a user mentions an npm compromise, Shai-Hulud, the Keyv/cacheable incident, suspicious preinstall scripts, credential-stealing packages, or asks whether a JavaScript project was exposed to a package supply-chain attack. Do not use as a general CVE or license audit.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml257 B
  • references/shai-hulud-2026-iocs.json2.0 KB
  • scripts/scan_npm_supply_chain.py19.4 KB
  • tests/test_scan_npm_supply_chain.py7.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

NPM Supply Chain Check

Run an evidence-bounded, read-only scan. Distinguish a dependency reference from proof that malicious code executed, and never read or print secret values.

Workflow

1. Fix the scan boundary

Resolve the exact repository or directory first. Default to the current repository only. Do not silently expand a repo scan to the user's home directory, all worktrees, global package caches, or CI systems.

2. Check intelligence freshness

Read references/shai-hulud-2026-iocs.json when investigating that incident. It is a dated minimum baseline, not a complete list of every affected community package. For an active incident, also check current primary sources such as the npm registry and maintainer/security advisories before declaring a version safe. Do not modify the bundled baseline during an ordinary scan.

3. Run the deterministic scanner

From this skill directory:

python3 scripts/scan_npm_supply_chain.py <target> --format text

Use JSON when another tool will consume the result:

python3 scripts/scan_npm_supply_chain.py <target> --format json

Add --deep only when source and built JavaScript files should also be searched for network and campaign strings. Deep mode still reports paths and indicators, not surrounding file contents.

Exit codes are machine-checkable:

  • 0: scan completed and found no indicators in the checked scope.
  • 1: one or more affected versions or suspicious indicators were found.
  • 2: the scan could not complete because its target or IOC data was invalid.

4. Classify the evidence

EvidenceMeaning
Affected version in a manifest or lockfileExposure candidate; it does not prove installation or execution.
Affected version under node_modulesMalicious package content may have been present locally.
Known malicious SHA-256High-confidence local artifact match.
IOC preinstall command or campaign/network stringStrong suspicious-content evidence; inspect provenance and timing.
IOC filename with a different hashTriage lead only; filenames such as setup.mjs can be legitimate.
No findingsNo known indicators in this scope and baseline; not proof of a clean machine.

Correlate positive results with installation timestamps, CI run history, package manager logs, and the incident exposure window. Do not claim credential theft solely from a lockfile match.

Operating Contract

Direct actions: Run read-only local scans, inspect public advisories and registry metadata, and report exact package, version, path, indicator, scope, and confidence. For a positive result, recommend pausing installs and affected CI jobs, isolating suspect runners or machines, preserving logs, and rotating potentially exposed credentials from a known-clean device.

Escalate before: Ask for explicit authorization before any action that would:

  • delete node_modules, caches, logs, or suspicious files;
  • reinstall dependencies or regenerate lockfiles;
  • revoke or rotate npm, GitHub, cloud, Kubernetes, Vault, payment, or chat tokens;
  • upload local artifacts or secret-bearing logs to a third party.

Those actions change evidence or external state and require explicit user authorization. If asked to remediate, make a reversible evidence copy or record hashes first and name the exact target before changing it.

Evidence-backed pushback: When a user proposes only upgrading or reinstalling after strong local execution evidence, explain that package replacement does not revoke credentials that may already have been copied. Ground that warning in the scanner finding and the credential classes targeted by the current incident source.

Feedback loop: When a new affected package, version, hash, or stable IOC is confirmed by a credible source, update the JSON baseline and add a regression fixture before treating the detector as current.

Gotchas

  • npm unpublishing prevents new downloads but does not remove local installs, package-manager caches, container layers, or CI artifacts.
  • Valid npm provenance proves how a package was published, not that the source repository or maintainer account was uncompromised.
  • Floating declarations such as latest do not prove which historical version was installed. Prefer lockfiles, installed manifests, and install logs.
  • Transitive packages may be absent from the root package.json; scan the lockfile and node_modules when available.
  • Binary bun.lockb files are reported as unsupported rather than silently treated as clean. Use a text lockfile or Bun tooling to resolve exact versions.
  • The bundled IOC list is intentionally source-attributed and dated. Extend it through a reviewed data update, not an invented fallback.

Report

Return:

## NPM Supply-Chain Check
- scope: <absolute target>
- baseline: <incident and updated_at>
- result: clean | suspicious | affected | incomplete
- confidence: low | medium | high

## Findings
- <severity> <path> - <package/version or IOC and what it proves>

## Limits
- <missing lockfile, unsupported binary lock, stale baseline, or unchecked external scope>

## Next Actions
1. <smallest safe action>

The check is done only when a fresh scanner result is available, all warnings are surfaced, and conclusions stay within the scanned target and IOC baseline.

Resources

  • scripts/scan_npm_supply_chain.py: read-only repository, lockfile, node_modules, preinstall, filename, hash, and optional deep-string scanner.
  • references/shai-hulud-2026-iocs.json: dated machine-readable baseline for the August 2026 Keyv/cacheable Shai-Hulud incident.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit and organize AI coding-agent instructions, including AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, skills, and agent definitions. Use when the user asks to diagnose conflicting instructions, excessive approval pauses, broad skill triggers, duplicate guidance, or broken instruction references, or to clean up that instruction set. Ordinary code review, Markdown editing, or application debugging alone does not trigger this workflow. Inspection stays read-only; apply changes when authorized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

Generate or update repository-specific AGENTS.md instruction files from real repo evidence. Use when asked to create, design, scaffold, split, or improve root or scoped AGENTS.md files for Codex/Claude/agent workflows, especially when a repo needs directory-specific rules, validation commands, generated-file boundaries, or a short agent onboarding router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

REST/GraphQL/gRPC API design best practices. Use when designing APIs, defining contracts, handling versioning. Covers OpenAPI 3.2, GraphQL Federation, gRPC streaming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

Mobile app UI design expert for iOS and Android. Use when designing app interfaces, creating design systems, ensuring accessibility, or following platform guidelines. Covers Material Design 3, Human Interface Guidelines, color theory, typography, and 2025 trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

End-to-end app feature inventory and user-story testing workflow with a canonical tracker. Use when the user asks to audit every feature, derive expected behavior from code, test user journeys, or explicitly fix and retest documented UX or logistical defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

Design architecture foundations before implementation. Use when asked to design or refactor architecture, choose Rust/Go crate, package, module, runtime, workflow, or service boundaries, compare mature project architecture, prevent stacked one-off PRs, audit migration debt in existing repos, or produce a spec before coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

majiayu000 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する