本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

structured-logging-lite

Design, audit, or implement application structured logging architecture from repository evidence. Use when a user asks whether or where to add logs, how to choose or migrate a logger, how to standardize events/fields/levels/redaction, how to add HTTP access or panic logs, or why production logs cannot answer an incident question. Do not use merely to tail platform logs or to design a full metrics, tracing, SLO, and incident-management program.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB
  • references/full-guide.md14.1 KB
  • references/go.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Structured Logging Lite

Build the smallest logging contract that makes the target system diagnosable without leaking data, duplicating audit records, or forcing an unnecessary logging-library migration.

Operating Contract

  • Direct actions: Inspect repositories, manifests, runtime entrypoints, tests, deployment files, and existing logs. Make local logging changes only when the user asks to implement or upgrade them; treat design, review, and diagnosis requests as read-only.
  • Escalate before: Ask before publishing, pushing, changing remote observability infrastructure, touching production, or expanding from application logging into a full observability rollout.
  • Evidence-backed pushback: Challenge a requested library migration or log-everything plan only with repository evidence, a measured requirement, a concrete security/cardinality risk, or a smaller compatible alternative.
  • Feedback loop: Promote repeated missing fields, false-success signals, secret leaks, or manual incident queries into the field contract, gotchas, validation tests, or a deterministic helper.
  • Never print or persist credentials, tokens, cookies, signatures, request bodies, DSNs, private URLs, or secret values while investigating.
  • Return errors through the existing error contract. A new log line never justifies swallowing, downgrading, or replacing an error.

Workflow

  1. Search before proposing. Read applicable repository instructions, check the worktree, then locate manifests, entrypoints, logger construction, log calls, request/context propagation, error mapping, panic handling, adapters, workers, audit records, metrics, tests, and deployment configuration.
  2. Classify the target. Distinguish a reusable library, CLI/batch job, HTTP service, long-running worker, or multi-service system. Libraries should usually accept host-provided diagnostics rather than configure process-global output.
  3. Reconstruct current coverage. Mark lifecycle, request, authentication, application milestones, external adapters, background jobs, degraded paths, panic/crash, and third-party library output as covered, partial, or missing.
  4. Name the operational questions. Require each proposed event to answer a concrete debugging, security, support, or capacity question. Delete events that only narrate normal control flow.
  5. Choose boundaries before libraries. Configure output at the composition root; observe requests at transport middleware; log effect failures at adapters; log worker batch outcomes at the worker owner; keep pure domain code free of logger dependencies.
  6. Keep or select the logger. Prefer a working repository-standard logger or a language standard library. Recommend migration only with evidence such as missing required capability, measured overhead, ecosystem incompatibility, or unsafe behavior.
  7. Write the contract. Define stable event names, required and conditional fields, level policy, error classification, correlation rules, redaction rules, retention/collection ownership, and low-cardinality metric labels.
  8. Implement incrementally when authorized. Land P0 request/error/security coverage first, P1 adapter and worker telemetry next, and tracing or backend-specific integration only when the runtime needs it.
  9. Verify with fresh evidence. Run repository-native build/tests plus log capture, secret-canary, route-normalization, panic, and streaming-response tests that match the change.

Boundary Rules

  • Treat logs, metrics, traces, and durable audit records as different contracts. Do not claim one replaces another.
  • Emit one request-completion event per request. Add a second event only when it contains a distinct root cause or business outcome.
  • Use route templates or operation names in metrics. Keep request IDs, user IDs, asset/order IDs, raw paths, URLs, and error strings out of metric and log-index labels.
  • Include trace_id and span_id only when a real trace context exists. Do not invent IDs or require tracing as a prerequisite for useful logging.
  • Prefer fixed error codes and reason enums over arbitrary error strings for aggregation. Preserve a safe cause for debugging without exposing upstream payloads.
  • Exclude or sample high-volume health and readiness success logs. Never sample security failures or user-visible server errors without an explicit loss policy.
  • Preserve optional response/stream interfaces when observing HTTP writers; a naive wrapper can break flushing, hijacking, streaming, or byte counts.

Deliverable

For design or audit work, report:

verdict:
current_evidence:
chosen_stack:
boundary_map:
event_and_field_contract:
privacy_and_cardinality:
coverage_gaps:
P0_P1_P2:
validation:
remaining_risks:

For implementation work, also report changed files, fresh verification commands, and any deployment or collector work that remains outside the repository.

Gotchas

  • Raw URL paths turn identifiers into unbounded labels and can leak query credentials.
  • Logging every function entry/exit creates volume without diagnostic value.
  • Logging both at every return site and again at the boundary duplicates the same failure.
  • ORM defaults may print interpolated SQL, expected not-found errors, or non-JSON output.
  • A logger hidden in generic context values becomes an implicit dependency; keep typed correlation data in context and logging ownership at boundaries.
  • A successful fallback that changes user-visible output still needs an error signal and metric; warn plus silent degradation is not success.
  • Access logs without status, duration, normalized route, and request ID rarely answer incident questions.
  • Persistent audit events require transactional and retention guarantees that stdout logs do not provide.

References

  • Read references/full-guide.md before designing a schema, level policy, rollout, or validation plan.
  • For Go repositories, also read references/go.md before choosing a library or implementing HTTP, slog, or ORM integration.
  • For a full observability/SLO/tracing program, route to observability-sre after the logging contract is clear.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit and organize AI coding-agent instructions, including AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, skills, and agent definitions. Use when the user asks to diagnose conflicting instructions, excessive approval pauses, broad skill triggers, duplicate guidance, or broken instruction references, or to clean up that instruction set. Ordinary code review, Markdown editing, or application debugging alone does not trigger this workflow. Inspection stays read-only; apply changes when authorized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

Generate or update repository-specific AGENTS.md instruction files from real repo evidence. Use when asked to create, design, scaffold, split, or improve root or scoped AGENTS.md files for Codex/Claude/agent workflows, especially when a repo needs directory-specific rules, validation commands, generated-file boundaries, or a short agent onboarding router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

REST/GraphQL/gRPC API design best practices. Use when designing APIs, defining contracts, handling versioning. Covers OpenAPI 3.2, GraphQL Federation, gRPC streaming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

Mobile app UI design expert for iOS and Android. Use when designing app interfaces, creating design systems, ensuring accessibility, or following platform guidelines. Covers Material Design 3, Human Interface Guidelines, color theory, typography, and 2025 trends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

End-to-end app feature inventory and user-story testing workflow with a canonical tracker. Use when the user asks to audit every feature, derive expected behavior from code, test user journeys, or explicitly fix and retest documented UX or logistical defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

Design architecture foundations before implementation. Use when asked to design or refactor architecture, choose Rust/Go crate, package, module, runtime, workflow, or service boundaries, compare mature project architecture, prevent stacked one-off PRs, audit migration debt in existing repos, or produce a spec before coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

majiayu000 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する