本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

analiz-gate

Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Analiz Gate

Overview

Some work can go straight to implementation tasks; some needs the architect to investigate first. Guessing wrong is costly: skipping a needed analiz produces bounced tasks, and forcing analiz on trivial work wastes a cycle.

Core principle: Analiz when the approach is unknown; skip it when the work is clear and small.

Open a type=analiz task when ANY of

  • The stack/framework for the feature is unknown.
  • The API or UI contract between components is undefined.
  • The request is broad and needs technical slicing.
  • Repository feasibility is unknown (new integration, DB schema change).
  • Estimated scope > 1 developer-day with unclear breakdown.
  • A new frontend or app has no design system yet (get_design_system returns nothing) and its screens still need slicing — open the design-system task yourself with request_design_system (implementation-task-spec) so it runs alongside the analysis, and carry the design brief and its key in the analiz description; the architect makes the UI tasks wait for it.
  • The change spans two or more repositories, or creates a new API contract between layers.
  • It's a greenfield product or a brand-new repository.

When unsure between a direct task and analiz, take analiz — hidden complexity only grows once implementation starts.

Do NOT open analiz for

  • Small bug fixes with clear reproduction steps.
  • Pure UI copy or styling changes.
  • Features already analyzed and documented.

Mechanics

Assign the analiz task to system-architect and move it to todo (investigation is always safe to start — no stakeholder approval needed). The analysis itself returns through the human analiz_review gate before any implementation task is created. Never assign analiz to yourself or a developer.

Worked Example

  • "Change the button label from 'Save' to 'Apply'." → No analiz: pure copy change → one frontend task.
  • "Add real-time notifications." → Analiz: transport (WebSocket? SSE? polling?) and the contract are undefined → analiz task to the architect.
  • "Fix the 500 when deleting a task with subtasks." → No analiz: clear repro → one bug task.

Common Mistakes

  • Forcing analiz on a one-line copy change.
  • Skipping analiz on a broad "add reporting" request → the dev bounces on undefined scope.
  • Assigning analiz to a developer.

Red Flags

  • An implementation task created for a request whose approach nobody has defined.
  • An analiz task assigned to anyone but the architect.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

Use when you write or revise the analiz deliverable - the ONE self-contained HTML report (spec and plan as sections) a human reviews passage by passage

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1122026年10月12日 更新

makifbaysal のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する