Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search real-time news with bias scoring, get live stock/ETF/crypto data with AI analysis, price options with ML models, and synthesize balanced news perspectives via the Helium MCP server.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Undeveloped: Single news source, no bias awareness, manual searching.
Target: Multi-source searches with bias scores, balanced perspective synthesis, live market data.
Optimized: AI-ranked trading strategies, predictive scenarios, automated watchlists, integrated portfolio analysis.
Intelligence comes from multiple perspectives with bias context. News sources have inherent bias (political, emotional, prescriptive) — understanding that bias enables better decision-making. Market data without context is incomplete.
Add to MCP settings file (e.g., ~/.config/Claude/mcp_servers.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"helium": {
"url": "https://heliumtrades.com/mcp"
}
}
}
Free tier: 50 queries per day, no signup/API key required.
Basic news search:
Search: "artificial intelligence regulation"
Returns: 50 most relevant articles with bias scores
Multi-dimensional bias scores include:
Interpret results:
## News Search Results: "AI Regulation"
### Top Articles (sorted by relevance)
1. **"EU Passes AI Act Requirements"** — Reuters
- Political Lean: Center (bias score: 0.0)
- Emotionality: Low (very factual)
- Factfulness: High (evidence-based)
- Source Reliability: 9.2/10
- Date: April 26, 2026
- URL: [link]
2. **"AI Regulation Will Destroy Innovation"** — TechCrunch
- Political Lean: Right (bias score: 0.6)
- Emotionality: High (opinion-heavy)
- Factfulness: Medium (some opinion)
- Sensationalism: 6.5/10
- URL: [link]
3. **"Tech Companies Lobby Against AI Rules"** — CNN
- Political Lean: Center-Left (bias score: -0.3)
- Emotionality: Medium
- Factfulness: Medium
- URL: [link]
### Bias Comparison
- Reuters: Most neutral and factual ✓
- CNN: Slightly left-leaning, emotional
- TechCrunch: Right-leaning, sensational
Request AI-synthesized perspective:
get_balanced_news query: "Should tech companies pay taxes?"
Output includes:
Example:
## Balanced Perspective: "Tech Company Taxation"
### Left-leaning View
"Tech giants exploit tax loopholes to avoid paying fair share.
Closing loopholes is necessary for infrastructure funding."
### Center/Neutral View
"Complex tax rules create challenges; need to balance revenue with
avoiding business flight. International coordination improving."
### Right-leaning View
"Lower corporate taxes drive innovation and job creation.
Aggressive taxation discourages business investment."
### Common Ground
- Complex tax system needs modernization
- Balance needed between revenue and business health
- International coordination increasing
### Key Disagreements
- Fairness vs. growth priority
- Government revenue needs
- Effectiveness of tax enforcement
Get bias profile for a specific source:
get_source_bias source: "Fox News"
Returns:
## Fox News — Bias Profile
**Overall Lean**: Right (0.7/1.0)
**Factfulness**: 6.2/10 (Mixed)
**Sensationalism**: 7.1/10 (High)
**Emotional Tone**: Often passionate
**Typical Patterns**:
- Emphasis on conservative policy positions
- Skepticism of progressive initiatives
- Personality-driven opinion shows mixed with news
- Covers stories emphasizing government overreach
**Reliability**: 6.4/10 (Mixed; opinion-heavy content)
**Use for**: Understanding conservative perspective;
note that opinion shows (high bias) mix with news reports.
Get ticker data with AI analysis:
get_ticker ticker: "AAPL" # Apple stock
Returns:
## Apple Inc. (AAPL)
**Current Price**: $185.42
**52-Week Range**: $128.50 - $189.95
**P/E Ratio**: 32.1
### AI-Generated Bull Case
"Strong services revenue growth, installed base expansion,
upcoming product cycles could drive stock higher."
### AI-Generated Bear Case
"High valuation relative to earnings; China demand uncertainty;
tech sector regulatory risks."
### Probability-Weighted Scenarios (30-day forecast)
| Scenario | Probability | Target | Rationale |
|----------|-------------|--------|-----------|
| 🟢 Strong momentum | 25% | $195 | Services growth, product cycle |
| 🟡 Consolidation | 45% | $180-185 | Macro uncertainty, valuation |
| 🔴 Correction | 20% | $165 | Tech selloff, China weakness |
| 💥 Black swan | 10% | $150 | Regulatory shock, recession |
**Expected Value**: $183 (probability-weighted)
Get ML-predicted option value:
get_option_price symbol: "AAPL" strike: 180 expiration: "2026-05-16" side: "CALL"
Returns:
## AAPL Call Option Analysis
**Contract**: AAPL $180 Call (May 16, 2026)
**ML Predictions**:
- Fair Value: $7.82
- Probability ITM: 78.3%
- Breakeven Stock Price: $187.82
**Current Market**:
- Bid: $7.50
- Ask: $8.25
- Implied Volatility: 22%
**Assessment**:
✓ Option is fairly priced (market $7.88 vs. ML $7.82)
✓ High probability ITM (78%)
⚠️ Limited edge if buying now
**Greeks**: Delta 0.78 | Gamma 0.02 | Theta 0.08/day | Vega 0.34
Get AI-ranked options strategies:
get_top_trading_strategies symbol: "SPY" outlook: "neutral"
Returns:
## Top Neutral Strategies for SPY
### Rank 1: Iron Condor (SPY 440/445/455/460)
- **Max Profit**: $300 (if SPY stays between 445-455)
- **Max Loss**: $200
- **Probability Success**: 68%
- **Risk/Reward**: 1:1.5 favorable
- **Ideal Market**: Low volatility, range-bound
### Rank 2: Short Straddle (SPY 450 strike)
- **Max Profit**: $400 (if SPY exactly at 450)
- **Max Loss**: Unlimited (IV crush risk)
- **Probability Success**: 52%
- **Ideal Market**: Expect mean reversion
### Rank 3: Call Spread (450/455)
- **Max Profit**: $200
- **Max Loss**: $300
- **Probability Success**: 60%
- **Ideal Market**: Slight bullish bias
| Use Case | Query |
|---|---|
| Bias check | search_news + get_source_bias |
| Balanced view | search_balanced_news on controversial topic |
| Stock research | get_ticker then get_option_price for key strikes |
| Trading ideas | get_top_trading_strategies for your outlook |
| Trending topics | get_trending_topics |
Deliver:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Ably tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Abstract tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Abuselpdb tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Abyssale tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。