Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith. Analyze agent behavior, investigate errors, and review tool calls and performance metrics.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Undeveloped: Print logs manually; hard to trace agent decisions.
Target: Fetch recent traces programmatically, analyze tool calls, spot errors.
Optimized: Automatic anomaly detection, performance trends, cost optimization insights.
Traces tell the story. Instead of guessing why an agent failed, fetch the execution trace, see exactly which tools were called with which inputs/outputs, and identify the failure point instantly.
Install CLI:
pip install langsmith-fetch
Set environment variables:
export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your_api_key"
export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="your_project_name"
# Verify setup
echo $LANGSMITH_API_KEY
echo $LANGSMITH_PROJECT
Get API key:
Get traces from last N minutes:
# Last 5 minutes (limit 5 traces)
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5 --format pretty
# Last 1 hour (limit 20 traces)
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-hours 1 --limit 20 --format json > traces.json
# Last 7 days (all traces)
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-days 7 --format json
Output format:
## Recent Traces — LangSmith
### Trace 1: Agent-Query-2024-04-26-14:32:15
**Status**: ✅ SUCCESS
**Duration**: 2.3 seconds
**Tokens**: 412 input, 156 output (total: 568)
**Cost**: $0.012
### Trace 2: Agent-Query-2024-04-26-14:30:42
**Status**: ❌ ERROR
**Duration**: 5.1 seconds
**Tokens**: 345 input, 89 output (partial)
**Error**: Tool call returned None (tool: search_documents)
### Trace 3: Agent-Query-2024-04-26-14:28:03
**Status**: ✅ SUCCESS
**Duration**: 1.8 seconds
**Tokens**: 287 input, 124 output (total: 411)
**Cost**: $0.008
Inspect specific trace:
# Get details for a trace ID
langsmith-fetch trace-details \
--trace-id "run-abc123def456" \
--format pretty
Trace breakdown:
## Trace Details: run-abc123def456
### Execution Flow
1️⃣ **Input Processing**
- User Query: "Find recent AI news articles"
- Elapsed: 0.1s
- Tokens: 12 input
2️⃣ **Tool 1: search_news**
- Input: { query: "artificial intelligence news", limit: 5 }
- Duration: 1.2s
- Output: [Article 1, Article 2, ...]
- Tokens: 234 in/89 out
3️⃣ **Tool 2: summarize_articles**
- Input: [Article 1, Article 2, ...]
- Duration: 0.8s
- Output: "Summary text..."
- Tokens: 156 in/67 out
4️⃣ **Final Response**
- Generated text: "Here are the latest articles..."
- Total time: 2.3s
- Total tokens: 412 in / 156 out
### Memory State (if applicable)
- Long-term memory accessed: 2 entries
- New memories saved: 1 entry
- Memory tokens: 45 in / 0 out
Find failing traces:
# Get only failed traces
langsmith-fetch traces \
--status FAILED \
--last-n-hours 24 \
--limit 10 \
--format pretty
Analyze errors:
## Failed Trace Analysis
### Error Pattern: Tool Timeout (3 occurrences in 24h)
**Traces**: run-123, run-456, run-789
**Tool**: search_documents
**Common Pattern**: Query is complex (>100 tokens)
**Duration**: 5.0s (exceeded timeout)
**Recommendation**: Simplify query or increase timeout
### Error Pattern: Tool Returns None (2 occurrences)
**Traces**: run-234, run-567
**Tool**: fetch_weather_api
**Likely Cause**: API down or rate-limited
**Recommendation**: Add retry logic with exponential backoff
### Error Pattern: Agent Hallucination (1 occurrence)
**Trace**: run-890
**Tool**: search_database
**Issue**: Agent claimed tool returned [X], but actually returned [Y]
**Recommendation**: Add output validation before agent processing
Analyze which tools are used most:
# Get summary of tool usage
langsmith-fetch tool-stats --last-n-days 7 --format json | \
jq -r '.[] | "\(.tool_name): \(.call_count) calls, \(.avg_duration)s avg"'
Output:
search_documents: 24 calls, 1.2s avg
send_email: 18 calls, 0.8s avg
fetch_user_data: 12 calls, 0.5s avg
calculate_score: 8 calls, 0.2s avg
Find slow/expensive tools:
## Tool Performance Analysis (Last 7 Days)
| Tool | Calls | Avg Duration | Total Cost | Success Rate |
|------|-------|--------------|-----------|--------------|
| search_documents | 24 | 1.2s | $0.18 | 92% |
| send_email | 18 | 0.8s | $0.04 | 100% |
| fetch_user_data | 12 | 0.5s | $0.02 | 100% |
| calculate_score | 8 | 0.2s | $0.01 | 100% |
**Opportunities for optimization**:
- search_documents: Lowest success rate; consider caching
- send_email: Relatively slow; batch if possible
- Overall cost: $0.25/day = $7.50/month for this project
Check long-term memory usage:
# Get memory activity
langsmith-fetch memory-ops \
--last-n-hours 24 \
--format pretty
Analysis:
## Memory Operations (Last 24 Hours)
### Writes
- Saved 12 new memories
- Updated 3 existing memories
- Deleted 1 memory (expired)
- Total: 16 operations
### Reads
- Accessed memory 8 times
- Retrieved 3-5 memories per access
- Memory hit rate: 78% (relevant memories found)
### Issues
- ⚠️ One memory write failed (auth error)
- ⚠️ Memory retrieval slow (1.2s avg) — consider indexing
Create actionable insights:
# Agent Debugging Report — April 26, 2026
## Summary
- Total traces analyzed: 47
- Success rate: 85%
- Avg performance: 2.1s per query
- Avg cost: $0.012 per query
## Issues Found
### Critical ❌
1. **Tool Timeout Pattern** (3 failures)
- Tool: search_documents
- Root cause: Complex queries exceed timeout
- Fix: Increase timeout from 5s to 10s, or simplify query decomposition
- Impact: Fixes ~6% of failures
2. **Memory Retrieval Slow** (1.2s avg)
- Root cause: Sequential lookup of 100+ memories
- Fix: Add vector index to memory store
- Impact: Would reduce agent latency by ~40%
### Medium ⚠️
3. **Tool Success Rate Variance**
- search_documents: 92% success
- send_email: 100% success
- Recommendation: Add retries for search_documents
## Optimization Opportunities
| Opportunity | Effort | Impact | Priority |
|-----------|--------|--------|----------|
| Add vector index for memory | Medium | 40% latency ↓ | High |
| Increase search timeout | Low | 6% failures ↓ | Medium |
| Batch email sends | Medium | 20% cost ↓ | Medium |
| Simplify query decomposition | High | 30% latency ↓ | Low |
## Next Steps
- [ ] Implement vector index for memory
- [ ] Test with increased timeout (5s → 10s)
- [ ] Monitor failure rate post-fix
- [ ] Consider query simplification if still hitting timeout
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| API key not set | Run export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="key" and verify with echo $LANGSMITH_API_KEY |
| Project name missing | Set export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="project-name" from LangSmith dashboard |
| No traces found | Ensure agent ran recently; traces visible within 30s |
| Outdated data | Traces may lag; wait 1-2 min and retry fetch |
Deliver:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Ably tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Abstract tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Abuselpdb tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Abyssale tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。