本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

lead-research-assistant

Identify high-quality sales leads by analyzing your business, defining ideal customer profile, and discovering target companies with personalized contact strategies.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Lead Research Assistant

Use This Skill When

  • Finding potential customers for your product or service
  • Building B2B prospect lists for sales outreach
  • Identifying companies for partnership opportunities
  • Preparing target account list for sales campaigns
  • Researching companies matching your ideal customer profile
  • Discovering expansion opportunities in new markets

When NOT to Use

  • Recruitment/hiring (different purpose)
  • Consumer audience research (not B2B focused)
  • Competitive analysis only (not lead-focused)
  • Market research reports (broader scope)

Context: Lead Research Maturity

Undeveloped: Manual Google searches, unqualified leads, no strategy.

Target: Defined ICP (Ideal Customer Profile), prioritized company list, contact approaches.

Optimized: Automated prospecting, multi-channel contact data, engagement scoring, CRM integration.

Core Principle

Better leads = higher conversion. Defining your Ideal Customer Profile clearly and researching company fit systematically leads to higher-quality sales conversations and shorter sales cycles.

Instructions

Step 1: Define Your Product & Value Prop

Document your offering:

## Product Definition

**What**: [Brief product description]
**Problem Solved**: [Primary pain point]
**Ideal Customer**: [Type of company/buyer]
**Key Differentiator**: [Why you vs. competitors]

### Example (SaaS)
**What**: Cloud-based incident response platform
**Problem**: Teams waste hours on incident coordination during outages
**Ideal Customer**: DevOps/SRE teams at growth-stage tech companies
**Differentiator**: AI-suggested responses + Slack-first workflow

Step 2: Define Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)

Create comprehensive ICP criteria:

CriterionDetailsWeighting
IndustrySaaS, FinTech, HealthcareMust-have
Company Size50-500 employees (Series A-C)Strong
Revenue$5M-$50M ARRImportant
Growth StageScaling (20%+ YoY growth)Important
Tech StackUses cloud infrastructure (AWS/Azure)Nice-to-have
Pain PointsFrequent incidents, alert fatigueMust-have

Calculate Lead Score:

  • Meets all must-haves: 100 points
  • Matches 80% of important criteria: 80 points
  • Matches few criteria: 40 points

Step 3: Research Target Companies

Search approaches:

Method 1: Direct company databases

  • G2 reviews (companies in adjacent solutions)
  • Crunchbase (growth-stage companies)
  • PitchBook (funded startups)
  • LinkedIn Sales Navigator

Method 2: Market analysis

  • Industry reports
  • Funded startups in verticals
  • Recent IPOs and public companies

Method 3: Referrals and warm intros

  • Ask customers for similar companies
  • Industry events and conferences
  • Online communities (Reddit, Slack)

Build prospecting list:

## Target Companies List (Top 20)

| Company | Industry | Size | Score | Fit Rationale | Contact Info |
|---------|----------|------|-------|---------------|--------------|
| Company A | FinTech | 150 emp | 95 | Uses AWS, 40% growth, hiring engineers | [contacts] |
| Company B | SaaS | 300 emp | 88 | Series B, growing incident team | [contacts] |
| Company C | Healthcare | 75 emp | 82 | Cloud-first, struggling with alerts | [contacts] |

**Score 95-100**: Tier 1 (Hot prospects)
**Score 80-94**: Tier 2 (Good fits)
**Score 60-79**: Tier 3 (Long shots)

Step 4: Gather Contact Intelligence

For top 20 companies, collect:

  • Decision-makers: VP Eng, Head of SRE, CTO
  • Email formats (if detectable)
  • LinkedIn profiles
  • Recent news (funding, hiring, product launches)
  • Company pain signals (Twitter/LinkedIn complaints)

Tools to use:

ToolPurpose
RocketReach, Hunter.io, ClearbitEmail finding
LinkedIn Sales NavigatorDecision-maker research
Crunchbase, PitchBookCompany intelligence
G2, CapterraProduct/culture signals

Step 5: Develop Contact Strategies

Create personalized approach for each Tier 1 prospect:

## Company A — Contact Strategy

**Target Decision-Maker**: John Smith, VP Engineering

**Research Signals**:
- Recently hired 3 SRE engineers (LinkedIn update)
- Tweeted about "alert fatigue" last month
- Using PagerDuty (main competitor space)

**Contact Angle**: "I noticed you're hiring SRE talent — incident response tooling is often the bottleneck for growing teams like yours"

**Outreach Sequence**:
1. LinkedIn connection request (personalized)
2. Wait 3-5 days, then warm email
3. If no response in 1 week, try different contact
4. Follow up every 2 weeks (max 3 attempts)

**Email Template**:

Subject: Quick idea for [Company]'s incident response

Hi John,

I noticed you recently expanded your SRE team. Great to see!

We work with teams like [Competitor Company] on incident response automation — cut incident resolution time in half typically.

Worth a 15-minute call to explore if it's relevant?

[Link to calendar]

[Your name]


**Alternative Approach**:
- If LinkedIn connection fails, try Twitter/email
- If email bounces, research for direct team contact
- If cold outreach fails, look for warm intro via mutual connection

Step 6: Prioritize and Sequence

Create outreach plan:

## Outreach Campaign — Q2 2026

### Phase 1: Tier 1 (Week 1-2)
- [ ] Send to Top 5 prospects
- [ ] Track responses
- [ ] Book any interested calls

### Phase 2: Tier 2 (Week 3-4)
- [ ] Send to next 10 prospects
- [ ] Iterate messaging based on Phase 1 responses

### Phase 3: Tier 3 (Week 5+)
- [ ] Broader outreach or focus based on learnings

### Tracking
- Outreach rate: [Goal] emails/week
- Response rate target: [Goal] %
- Meeting booking rate: [Goal] %
- Win rate goal: [Goal] %

**Weekly check-in**:
- [ ] How many prospects reached?
- [ ] Response rate? (Iterate messaging if <10%)
- [ ] Meetings booked? (Target: 1-3/week)

Step 7: Refine Based on Feedback

After initial outreach:

## Learnings & Refinement

**What worked**:
- Response rate highest from [Approach]
- Best meetings from [Contact type]
- Strongest fit from [Industry/Size segment]

**What didn't**:
- Cold emails to [Title] got 0% response
- [Competitor name] messaging fell flat

**Refined ICP**:
- Upgrade from "50-500" to "100-300" employees (better fit)
- Add "Recent funding" as strong signal
- Remove "Nice-to-have" tech stack filters

**Next iteration**:
- Focus on [Top-performing segment]
- Adjust messaging to emphasize [Key benefit]
- Test new channel: [LinkedIn vs. Email vs. Community]

Output

Deliver:

  1. ICP Definition (criteria, scoring model)
  2. Target Company List (20-50 companies ranked by fit)
  3. Contact Intelligence (decision-makers, emails, signals)
  4. Personalized Outreach Strategy (approach for each Tier)
  5. Campaign Plan (sequencing, tracking, goals)
  6. Refinement Notes (based on results)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate Ably tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate Abstract tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate Abuselpdb tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

Automate Abyssale tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

manu14357/zskills162026年7月24日 更新

manu14357 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する