Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
<skill_contract> <input>Actor, desired outcome, current behavior, context, constraints, baseline evidence, and review horizon.</input> <output>An agency-preserving HAS behavior system with cues, effort levels, SOP, measures, recovery, and review cadence.</output> <done>The target behavior is observable, runnable on a low-motivation day, evidenced, and assigned one review owner.</done> <non_goals>Coercion, unsupported identity claims, vague motivation advice, or optimizing lagging outcomes without behaviors.</non_goals>
Convert an outcome into the smallest observable behavior system that can survive low-motivation days. Preserve agency; optimize the environment before blaming the actor.
Provide: desired outcome, actor, context, current behavior, constraints, review horizon, and available evidence. Optional: failed attempts and environmental cues.
<unknowns_gate>
Classify unknowns as known, probeable, testable, or blocked. If actor, target behavior, or safety boundary is absent, return NEEDS_INPUT with one minimal question. A reversible assumption is allowed only when labeled and paired with a same-cycle test.
</unknowns_gate>
<execute>Build the HAS sequence:
trigger -> action -> evidence -> recovery -> stop so a missed run has a next move.Reduce friction before adding motivation. Prefer defaults, visible cues, prepared tools, and short feedback latency. Keep the minimum behavior useful rather than ceremonial.
</execute> <evaluate>Check that the behavior is observable, starts in a named context, fits the minimum effort budget, produces evidence, and has a recovery path. Reject plans that depend on constant willpower, hide coercion, or measure only outcomes. If the check fails, revise the highest-friction element once and re-evaluate.
</evaluate><state_contract>
Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus baseline, current H1-H5 design, review date, and revision history. Update atomically after each review; never overwrite prior observations.
</state_contract>
NEEDS_INPUT: a target, actor, or boundary is missing; ask one narrow probe.INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE: baseline is unknown; run a short observation period before optimizing.VERIFY_FAILED: the behavior is not observable, feasible, or linked to the outcome; revise one variable.BUDGET_STOP: the review horizon or effort budget is exhausted; preserve state and report the next experiment.Return status, result (H1-H5 plan), evidence (baseline and measures), unknowns, and next_action (owner plus review date).
</skill_contract>
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a long-running agent task needs context budgeting, checkpointing, compaction, retrieval, or capability-based model routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。