本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

multi-tenant-architecture

Designs tenant isolation, hostname routing, custom-domain lifecycle, and plan limits on Cloudflare or Vercel. Use when asked to "isolate tenant data", "support custom domains", "build a white-label platform", or assess PSL registration. For general module structure use codebase-architecture; for SEO content use seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mblode/agent-skillsスター 166(GitHub 166 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(8)

  • SKILL.md12.1 KB
  • evals/evals.json1.5 KB
  • references/cloudflare-platform.md8.8 KB
  • references/data-isolation.md6.2 KB
  • references/limits-and-quotas.md5.9 KB
  • references/psl.md3.4 KB
  • references/vercel-domains.md6.8 KB
  • references/vercel-platform.md9.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Multi-Tenant Platform Architecture (Cloudflare or Vercel)

  • IS: platform choice, domain strategy and PSL, tenant identification, compute and data isolation, hostname routing, tenant context propagation, custom domains and SSL, per-tenant static files, and mapping platform limits to plans.
  • IS NOT: general folder structure or module contracts (use codebase-architecture), scaffolding a new repo (use scaffold-nextjs), or the content of per-tenant SEO files once routing serves them dynamically: sitemap entries, canonical URLs, structured data, indexing policy (use seo).

Contents

  • Platform dispatch (decide first)
  • Reference files
  • Workflow (order matters)
  • Gotchas
  • Output schema
  • Evidence commands
  • Related skills

Platform dispatch (decide first)

SignalsPlatformModel
Tenants upload or generate their own code; code-level isolation; edge compute on KV, D1, Durable Objects, R2CloudflareDispatch Worker in front of a dispatch namespace of per-tenant Workers; Cloudflare for SaaS for custom hostnames
Every tenant runs the same Next.js codebase and differs by content, branding, and plan; ISR, Server Components, Vercel deploysVercelOne deployment; proxy.ts resolves the tenant from the hostname; wildcard plus custom domains on the project
  • Pick one platform per product. Fronting a Vercel app with a Cloudflare proxy doubles the TLS and redirect layers and is the usual cause of redirect loops and failed certificate issuance.
  • Tenants shipping their own code on Vercel is the multi-project model (one Vercel project per tenant, created with the SDK). It follows the Cloudflare row's isolation reasoning; this skill's Vercel references cover the single-deployment model only.

Reference files

FileRead when
cloudflare-platform.mdCloudflare chosen: dispatch namespaces, routing, Cloudflare for SaaS custom hostnames, isolation modes, KV and D1 (steps 3 to 7)
vercel-platform.mdVercel chosen: proxy.ts resolution, App Router layout, Global Config lookups, per-tenant static files, custom subpaths, local dev (steps 4 to 7)
vercel-domains.mdVercel chosen: SDK domain lifecycle, DNS targets, verification, wildcard nameservers, SSL, troubleshooting (step 7)
data-isolation.mdStep 3 on either platform: shared schema with RLS, schema-per-tenant, database-per-tenant, and the Postgres/Supabase/Drizzle policy pattern
psl.mdStep 1 when tenants publish content or run code on sibling subdomains: eligibility, submission, interim cookie controls
limits-and-quotas.mdStep 8: Cloudflare, Vercel, and Neon limit names with the official source for each, to map onto plans

Workflow (order matters)

Copy this checklist to track progress:

Multi-tenant progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Domain strategy and PSL decision
- [ ] Step 2: Tenant identification strategy
- [ ] Step 3: Isolation model (compute and data)
- [ ] Step 4: Deterministic routing
- [ ] Step 5: Tenant context propagation
- [ ] Step 6: Tenant config and least-privilege bindings
- [ ] Step 7: Custom domains and per-tenant static files
- [ ] Step 8: Limits mapped to plans, evidence captured
  1. Choose the domain strategy
  • Put tenant workloads on a dedicated registrable domain (acme.app for tenants, acme.com for brand). One phishing tenant on x.acme.com puts the whole domain on blocklists, and a tenant cookie with Domain=acme.com reaches your dashboard.
  • Keep the dashboard and auth on a different apex from tenant subdomains (app.acme.com for the console, *.acme.app for tenants).
  • If tenants publish content or run code on sibling subdomains, submit the label directly above the tenant name (acme.app, or sites.acme.app for <tenant>.sites.acme.app) to the PSL and start now: there is no SLA. Tenant-owned custom domains need no PSL entry. Otherwise record No PSL with the reason.
  1. Choose tenant identification (one primary; custom domain as the upgrade path)
  • Subdomain tenant.acme.app: wildcard DNS plus wildcard certificate. The default.
  • Custom domain tenant.com: the tenant CNAMEs to you. Paying tenants; reputation shifts to them; needs the onboarding lifecycle in step 7.
  • Path acme.app/tenant: no per-tenant DNS or certificates, but no cookie isolation and no branding. Choose it only when tenants will never get a hostname.
  1. Define the isolation model
  • Compute, Cloudflare: one dispatch namespace in untrusted mode; per-invocation cpuMs and subRequests limits per plan; an outbound Worker if tenant code may call the internet.
  • Compute, Vercel: one deployment, tenant code never executes. If tenants must ship code, move to Vercel multi-project or Cloudflare rather than sandboxing inside the app.
  • Data: shared schema with tenant_id on every tenant-aware table plus RLS is the default; database-per-tenant for regulated or noisy tenants, selectable per plan. See data-isolation.md.
  1. Route deterministically (tenants never influence routing or see each other)
  • Cloudflare: a single */* route on the SaaS zone to the dispatch Worker; hostname -> tenant record (KV, D1 on miss) -> env.DISPATCHER.get(script); Worker not found -> 404.
  • Vercel: proxy.ts (Next.js 16; middleware.ts with runtime: 'nodejs' on 15) reads host, looks the tenant up in Global Config or the database, rewrites into the tenant segment; unknown hostname -> 404, never the brand site.
  • Let /.well-known through before any tenant rewrite. Route robots.txt, sitemap.xml, and llms.txt into the tenant segment so they vary per tenant.
  1. Propagate tenant context from one authority
  • Delete every inbound x-tenant-* header, set x-tenant-id, x-tenant-slug, x-tenant-plan from the resolved tenant, and forward them on the request (NextResponse.next({ request: { headers } })). Server Components read await headers(); route handlers read request.headers. Cloudflare: the dispatch Worker sets headers or passes parameters before fetch.
  • The proxy is routing, not authorization. Server Functions, route handlers, and jobs re-derive the tenant from the session and the data layer enforces it (RLS or tenant_id predicates).
  1. Bind only what the tenant needs
  • Cloudflare: each user Worker gets its own bindings (KV namespace, D1 database, R2 prefix); adding a binding is an explicit redeploy. No shared globals.
  • Vercel: Global Config holds only hostname -> { id, slug, plan }; the database is the source of truth and write-through happens when a domain verifies. Feature flags and branding come from the database keyed by tenant id.
  1. Support custom domains and per-tenant static files
  • Lifecycle to design and record: add domain -> show DNS target -> verify ownership -> certificate issued -> mapping activated -> removal or failure path.
  • Cloudflare: Cloudflare for SaaS custom hostname on the SaaS zone, proxied fallback origin, customers.<you>.com CNAME target, http or txt validation, pre-validate before DNS cutover. See cloudflare-platform.md.
  • Vercel: projectsAddProjectDomain -> DNS values from the project's domain card -> _vercel TXT only if the domain is already on Vercel -> projectsVerifyProjectDomain -> Let's Encrypt HTTP-01. See vercel-domains.md.
  • robots.txt, sitemap.xml, llms.txt are route handlers inside the tenant segment with explicit Content-Type; nothing tenant-specific lives in /public. Their content is seo territory.
  1. Surface limits as plans and capture evidence
  • Fill the limits-to-plan table from limits-and-quotas.md, reading each current value from its source URL and dating it; enforce at the routing layer (Cloudflare limits, Vercel plan header plus server checks).
  • Nothing long-running in the request path: Cloudflare Queues or Workflows, Vercel background functions or cron.
  • Every tenant operation (create tenant, add domain, verify, remove) works over HTTP with the same authority as the UI; if it only works in the dashboard, the platform leaks into the UI.
  • Run the evidence commands and paste results into the output.

Gotchas

Platform and data gotchas live in the reference for that step; these fire before any reference loads.

  • Forwarding inbound tenant headers: curl -H "x-tenant-id: <other>" then serves another tenant's data. Delete or overwrite x-tenant-* on every path through the proxy or dispatch Worker, including paths that skip resolution (/.well-known, the brand site).
  • A hostname map keyed in a restricted alphabet (Global Config allows only ^[\w-]+$) needs a collision-free encoding or a hash; replacing dots with underscores maps a-b.example.com and a.b-example.com to one key. Keep the original hostname in the record and compare it on read.
  • Starting path-based with custom domains on the roadmap means URL rewrites, cookie changes, and DNS migration later.

Output schema

Length follows the decisions: drop any section the project does not face rather than filling it.

# Multi-tenant architecture

## Platform decision
- Platform: Cloudflare | Vercel
- Why this platform:
- Rejected platform and reason:

## Domain map
- Brand domain:
- Tenant domain:
- Tenant subdomains:
- Custom domains:
- PSL decision: Submit (suffix, owner, PR link, _psl TXT date) | No PSL (reason)

## Routing matrix
| Host pattern | Resolver | Destination | Unknown tenant behavior |
|---|---|---|---|

## Tenant context flow
- Authority: proxy.ts | dispatch Worker
- Headers set and stripped:
- Server read path:
- Data-layer enforcement:

## Isolation model
- Compute isolation:
- Data isolation (and per-plan variant):
- Config/binding isolation:

## Custom-domain lifecycle
1. DNS target:
2. Ownership verification:
3. Certificate provisioning:
4. Routing activation:
5. Removal/failure path:

## Limits-to-plan table
| Limit | Source URL / access date | Free | Pro | Enterprise | Enforcement point |
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|

## Validation evidence
| Check | Command | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|---|

Evidence commands

Run against local or preview before calling the design done; mark N/A with a reason.

CheckCommandExpected
Tenant boundary exists in coderg -n "x-tenant-id|CREATE POLICY|FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY|DISPATCHER.get" .Hits in proxy or dispatch Worker and in the schema
Unknown host is 404curl -sI -H "Host: nope.acme.app" <url>404
Forged header ignoredcurl -s -H "Host: a.acme.app" -H "x-tenant-id: tenant-b" <url>/api/whoamiTenant A
Static files varycurl -s -H "Host: a.acme.app" <url>/robots.txt vs -H "Host: b.acme.app"Different bodies, Content-Type: text/plain
RLS holds for the app rolepsql -c "BEGIN; SET LOCAL ROLE app_user; SELECT set_config('app.tenant_id','<t1>',true); SELECT count(*) FROM posts; ROLLBACK;"Only tenant t1's rows
ACME path reachablecurl -sI -H "Host: tenant.com" <url>/.well-known/acme-challenge/testNot a redirect into the tenant segment
Limits currentAccess date next to each URL in the limits tableDated within the planning window

Related skills

  • codebase-architecture: folder structure, module contracts, and the request-context pipeline for the application itself.
  • scaffold-nextjs: bootstrap the Next.js turborepo before applying these tenancy patterns.
  • seo: content of per-tenant robots.txt, sitemap.xml, llms.txt, canonical URLs, and structured data once routing serves them.

Maintenance only: evals/evals.json contains regression scenarios for changes to this skill; it does not load during a user task.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Implements agent-readiness on public sites and docs from Mintlify Agent Score, AFDocs, Is Agentic, Is It Agent Ready, or url-discovery-bench reports, or from server logs of agents 404ing on guessed URLs. Use when asked to "make our site agent-ready", "improve Agent Score", "fix llms.txt coverage", "agents keep 404ing on our docs", or when a pasted scorecard is the brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mblode/agent-skills1662026年10月26日 更新

Creates and improves portable Agent Skills with a validator, routing scenarios, and evidence-based keep, cut, merge, or retire decisions. Use when asked to "write a skill", "update all skills", "audit my SKILL.md", "remove redundant instructions", or fix skill triggering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mblode/agent-skills1662026年10月26日 更新

agents-md

無料

Audits and edits agent instruction files, verifies repository commands, and migrates repositories to AGENTS.md as the single shared source. Use when asked to "improve my AGENTS.md", "migrate CLAUDE.md to AGENTS.md", or make instructions work across agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mblode/agent-skills1662026年10月26日 更新

Builds and maintains a repo's own verification harness (verify CLI, doctor, worktree isolation, feature map, seed data) and a reproduce-first bug handoff. Use when asked to "build a verification harness", "add a doctor command", "prove every feature still works", or "reproduce this bug report".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mblode/agent-skills1662026年10月26日 更新

autoship

無料

Runs a changesets npm release through the version PR, CI publish, and registry verification. Use when asked to "release this package", "autoship", "merge Version Packages", or diagnose a release that did not publish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mblode/agent-skills1662026年10月26日 更新

ax-audit

無料

Audits agentic products for tool parity, authority, approval payloads, recovery, and trust using 24 rules and a ship verdict. Use when asked for an "AX audit", to review an agent approval flow, or whether an agent can operate the product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mblode/agent-skills1662026年10月26日 更新

mblode のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する