WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when creating product requirements documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Writing: read docs/skills/shared/writing-rule.md before you write a durable artifact.
Write a feature specification or product requirements document (PRD).
When /write-spec runs, activate the Product Manager role — they own PRD creation, user stories, and acceptance criteria. For roadmap-level prioritisation calls, escalate to the Head of Product.
Design-heavy features should also involve the UX Designer (for user flows) and the UI Designer (for component specs) once the PRD has a problem statement. Technical feasibility review happens at the Tech Design phase, not here — the /write-spec output hands off to the Tech Lead who activates for Phase 2.
See .claude/rules/role-triggers.md for the full activation protocol.
/write-spec SSO support for enterprise
/write-spec Users want to export data as CSV
/write-spec We need better onboarding
Accept any of: a feature name, a problem statement, a user request, or a vague idea.
Ask conversationally:
If the project has integrations available:
Resolve the PRD template via the portfolio helper so adopter overrides win when present:
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
template=$(portfolio_resolve_template prd.md) # → custom-templates/prd.md if present, else templates/prd.md
Single-fork adopters (no portfolio block) and adopters with no override fall straight through to templates/prd.md. Adopters who want a customised PRD shape drop their version at <private_repo>/custom-templates/prd.md. See templates/README.md for the path-mirroring convention.
Read .claude/rules/writing-standard.md before drafting. Treat the resolved template as the source of truth: keep required sections, remove empty conditional sections, replace unknown required values with TBD, and delete the guidance comment before filing.
The PRD should include:
# {Feature Name} — PRD
## Problem Statement
## Goals
3–5 specific, measurable outcomes
## Non-Goals
3–5 things explicitly out of scope
## User Stories
As a [user type], I want [capability] so that [benefit]
## Requirements
### Must-Have (P0)
### Nice-to-Have (P1)
### Future (P2)
## Success Metrics
### Leading Indicators (days–weeks)
### Lagging Indicators (weeks–months)
## Open Questions
## Timeline
The list above is illustrative. Use the resolved template's Required and Conditional guidance. Do not add an empty conditional section only because it appears in this example.
After generating the draft: ask if sections need adjustment, offer follow-ups.
Offer to create an epic / feature ticket in the team's tracker with the PRD content.
Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WCAG 2.2 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browse / search / show / stats AgDRs across the portfolio — recalls "have we decided this before?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analytics audit — SDK config, event naming, funnel completeness, dashboards. Deep-dive for /launch-check analytics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record per-PR architecture-review approval for design-artifact PRs (required by the architecture gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR architect "approved".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record per-PR design-review approval (UI merge gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR designer "approved".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。