Master backend architectures, REST API design, microservices, and server-side development across multiple languages. Use this as a central index to access specialized sub-skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[00] META. Orchestrate skills into dynamic chains for complex tasks. Analyzes the task, discovers available skills, builds an optimal chain, explains why each skill is needed, and executes step-by-step with user confirmation. Use for any complex task requiring multiple thinking/research/analysis steps. Triggers on "plan this", "how to approach", "what's the strategy", "build a plan", or any multi-step problem requiring skill orchestration.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Core Principle: Orchestrate skills dynamically. Analyze the task, discover available skills, build the right chain, explain the reasoning, execute step-by-step with confirmation.
This is a meta-skill — an orchestrator that:
🔗 CHAIN-FLOW 150 (Orchestrator)
↓
[1. Analyze Task] → What type of problem is this?
↓
[2. Discover Skills] → What skills are available? Where?
↓
[3. Build Chain] → Which skills? In what order?
↓
[4. Explain Why] → Justify each skill in the chain
↓
[5. Execute] → Step by step with confirmation
↓
[6. Adapt] → Modify chain if situation changes
Chain-Flow finds available skills by:
📁 SKILL LOCATIONS (search in order)
├── ./.codex/skills/ # Project skills folder (canonical)
├── ./skills/ # Legacy project skills (if present)
├── ./.claude/skills/ # Legacy project Claude skills (if present)
├── ~/.claude/skills/ # Personal skills (home directory, if present)
├── Plugin skills # From installed plugins
└── Built-in capabilities # Agent's native abilities
# Find all skill directories
ls -la ./.codex/skills/ 2>/dev/null
ls -la ./skills/ 2>/dev/null
ls -la ./.claude/skills/ 2>/dev/null
ls -la ~/.claude/skills/ 2>/dev/null
# Read each SKILL.md to understand capabilities
cat ./.codex/skills/*/SKILL.md | head -20 # Read descriptions
Universal trigger: Any complex task that needs multiple skills combined.
Specific triggers:
Key insight: Most real problems need chains of skills, not single skills.
Understand what the task requires:
Find what skills are available:
🔍 Skill Discovery:
- Scanning ./.codex/skills/ ...
- Scanning ./skills/ ...
- Scanning ./.claude/skills/ ...
- Scanning ~/.claude/skills/ ...
Found Skills:
├── goal-clarity-150 — Clarify objectives and success criteria
├── research-deep-150 — Deep research from internal + external sources
├── impact-map-150 — Map what changes affect
├── action-plan-150 — Create actionable plans with steps/risks
├── deep-think-150 — Quality reasoning and analysis
├── max-quality-150 — High quality execution
├── 74-mid-session-save-150 — Mid-session checkpoint for continuity
├── gated-exec-150 — Execute with confirmation gates
├── proof-grade-150 — Verify facts with confidence levels
├── integrity-check-150 — Final quality self-check
├── task-track-150 — Manage task lifecycle and status
├── tidy-up-150 — Quick cleanup after milestones
├── ask-ai-150 — Consult external AI models
└── skill-forge-150 — Create new skills when needed
Reading descriptions to match task requirements...
Construct the skill sequence:
Justify each skill:
📋 Proposed Chain:
1. goal-clarity-150
WHY: Task requirements are ambiguous, need to clarify first
2. research-deep-150
WHY: Need to understand current system + best practices
3. impact-map-150
WHY: Changes will affect multiple components
4. deep-think-150
WHY: Architecture decision with trade-offs
5. max-quality-150
WHY: Critical feature, needs high quality execution
Go step by step:
🔗 Chain Execution:
Step 1/5: goal-clarity-150
[Execute skill...]
✅ Complete. Proceed to Step 2? (Yes/No/Modify chain)
Modify chain based on new information:
🔄 Chain Adaptation:
New information discovered: Security implications found
→ Adding: security-check skill after impact-map
→ Updated chain: 1→2→3→3.5(new)→4→5
Continue with updated chain? (Yes/No)
When using Chain-Flow 150:
🔗 **Chain-Flow 150 Activated**
**Task Analysis:**
[Understanding of what's needed]
**Skills Discovered:**
- [List of available skills with brief descriptions]
**Proposed Chain:**
**Execution Plan:**
- Estimated steps: [N]
- Confirmation: After each skill
- Adaptation: Will modify if needed
**Ready to begin chain execution?**
During execution:
🔗 **Chain-Flow: Step [X/N]**
**Current Skill:** [skill-name]
**Purpose:** [why this skill now]
[Skill execution output...]
**Step Complete:** ✅
**Next:** [next-skill-name]
**Continue?** (Yes / No / Modify Chain / Skip to Step N)
goal-clarity-150 → research-deep-150 → impact-map-150 →
action-plan-150 → max-quality-150
goal-clarity-150 → research-deep-150 → impact-map-150 →
deep-think-150 → action-plan-150 → max-quality-150
research-deep-150 (logs, git) → impact-map-150 →
deep-think-150 → action-plan-150 (fix steps) → max-quality-150
goal-clarity-150 → research-deep-150 (options) →
deep-think-150 (trade-offs) → impact-map-150 → action-plan-150
research-deep-150 (understand) → impact-map-150 →
deep-think-150 (issues) → max-quality-150 (feedback)
goal-clarity-150 → impact-map-150 → research-deep-150 →
action-plan-150 (detailed steps) → max-quality-150
| Failure | Detection | Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong chain | Results don't help | Re-analyze, rebuild chain |
| Missing skill | Gap in chain | Add skill or use alternative |
| Wrong order | Dependencies broken | Reorder chain |
| Over-engineering | Too many skills | Simplify chain |
| Under-engineering | Skipped needed skill | Add missing skill |
User: "Add payment processing to the app"
AI: [Jumps straight to coding]
Result: Missed security requirements, broke existing checkout,
no understanding of payment gateway options
User: "Add payment processing to the app"
🔗 Chain-Flow 150 Activated
Task Analysis:
Complex integration task with security, external APIs,
and business logic implications.
Skills Discovered:
- goal-clarity-150, research-deep-150, impact-map-150
- action-plan-150, deep-think-150, max-quality-150
Proposed Chain:
1. goal-clarity-150
WHY: Payment requirements vary (subscriptions? one-time? refunds?)
2. research-deep-150
WHY: Need to evaluate Stripe vs PayPal vs others + security standards
3. impact-map-150
WHY: Touches checkout, user accounts, database, notifications
4. deep-think-150
WHY: Architecture decision for payment service integration
5. action-plan-150
WHY: Create detailed implementation plan with rollback points
6. max-quality-150
WHY: Payment code must be high quality (money involved)
Ready to begin? Starting with goal-clarity-150...
---
🔗 Chain-Flow: Step 1/5
Current Skill: goal-clarity-150
Purpose: Clarify payment requirements before research
[Executing goal-clarity-150...]
Questions:
- One-time payments, subscriptions, or both?
- Which currencies?
- Refund policy needed?
- PCI compliance level required?
[User answers...]
Step Complete: ✅
Requirements documented.
Next: research-deep-150
Continue? (Yes/No/Modify)
Chain-Flow is the orchestrator — it doesn't replace other skills, it combines them:
🔗 CHAIN-FLOW-150
(Orchestrator)
↓
┌────────────────────┼────────────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓
goal-clarity research-deep impact-map
↓ ↓ ↓
deep-think max-quality [others]
Remember: Complex problems need chains of skills, not single skills. Chain-Flow builds the right chain, explains why, and executes step-by-step with your confirmation. You stay in control while getting the benefit of orchestrated skill application.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Master backend architectures, REST API design, microservices, and server-side development across multiple languages. Use this as a central index to access specialized sub-skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
在每次回复中使用固定前缀并列出本次实际参考的指令/文件,便于校验是否遵循上下文与规则。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Arquitecto de Soluciones Principal y Consultor Tecnológico de Andru.ia. Diagnostica y traza la hoja de ruta óptima para proyectos de IA en español.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[00] TnR ABSOLUTE RIGOR — Systemic Verification Doctrine. Forced cognitive exertion for high-stakes investigations. Mandates absolute deconstruction, mathematical proof chains, and ≥95% derived certainty. Zero-tolerance for heuristics or sentiment-based reasoning. Shortcuts are defined as intentional hallucinations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。