本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

AI Governance Policy Builder

Build internal AI governance policies from scratch. Covers acceptable use, model selection, data handling, vendor contracts, compliance mapping, and board reporting.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md9.7 KB
  • README.md1.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

AI Governance Policy Builder

Build internal AI governance policies from scratch. Covers acceptable use, model selection, data handling, vendor contracts, compliance mapping, and board reporting.

When to Use

  • Writing or reviewing internal AI acceptable use policies
  • Establishing AI governance committees or review boards
  • Mapping AI usage to regulatory frameworks (EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001)
  • Evaluating vendor AI terms and liability clauses
  • Preparing board-level AI governance reports

Governance Policy Framework

1. Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)

Every organization running AI needs a written AUP covering:

Permitted Uses

  • List approved AI tools by department and function
  • Define data classification tiers (public, internal, confidential, restricted)
  • Map which data tiers can enter which AI systems
  • Specify approved vendors vs. shadow AI (employees using personal ChatGPT accounts)

Prohibited Uses

  • Customer PII in non-SOC2 models without anonymization
  • Autonomous financial decisions above $[threshold] without human review
  • HR screening/scoring without bias audit documentation
  • Any use violating sector regulations (HIPAA, GDPR, SOX, PCI-DSS)

Shadow AI Detection

SignalRisk LevelAction
API calls to unknown AI endpointsHIGHBlock + investigate
Browser extensions with AI featuresMEDIUMAudit + approve/deny
Personal accounts on company devicesMEDIUMPolicy reminder + monitor
Exported data to AI training setsCRITICALImmediate review

2. AI Model Selection & Procurement

Evaluation Scorecard (100 points)

CriteriaWeightWhat to Check
Data residency & sovereignty20Where is data processed? Stored? Can you choose region?
Security certifications20SOC2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA BAA, FedRAMP
Model transparency15Training data provenance, bias testing, version control
Contract terms15Data usage rights, indemnification, SLA, exit clauses
Performance & cost15Latency, accuracy benchmarks, token pricing, rate limits
Integration & support15API stability, documentation quality, support SLA

Minimum score for production deployment: 70/100

Red Flags (automatic disqualification):

  • Vendor trains on your data without opt-out
  • No data processing agreement (DPA) available
  • Indemnification excluded for AI outputs
  • No incident response SLA

3. Data Handling & Classification

AI Data Flow Audit Template

For each AI integration, document:

  1. Input data: What goes in? Classification tier? PII present?
  2. Processing: Where? Which model? Hosted or API? Region?
  3. Output data: What comes out? Stored where? Retention period?
  4. Training: Does vendor use your data for training? Opt-out confirmed?
  5. Logging: Are prompts/responses logged? Where? Who has access?
  6. Deletion: Can you request data deletion? Verified how?

Data Minimization Checklist

  • Only send minimum necessary data to AI systems
  • Strip PII before processing where possible
  • Use synthetic data for testing and development
  • Implement input sanitization for prompt injection prevention
  • Audit output for data leakage (model regurgitating training data)

4. Regulatory Compliance Mapping

EU AI Act (effective Aug 2025, enforcement Feb 2025)

Risk CategoryExamplesRequirements
UnacceptableSocial scoring, real-time biometric ID (most cases)Banned
High-riskHR screening, credit scoring, medical devicesConformity assessment, human oversight, transparency
LimitedChatbots, deepfakesTransparency obligations (disclose AI use)
MinimalSpam filters, game AINo requirements

NIST AI RMF (Risk Management Framework)

  • Map: Identify AI systems in use
  • Measure: Quantify risks per system
  • Manage: Implement controls proportional to risk
  • Govern: Establish oversight structure and accountability

ISO 42001 (AI Management System)

  • Useful for organizations wanting certified AI governance
  • Aligns with ISO 27001 (already have it? Easier path)
  • Covers: AI policy, risk assessment, objectives, competence, documentation

5. AI Governance Committee Structure

Recommended Composition

  • Chair: CTO or Chief AI Officer
  • Legal: 1 representative (contracts, compliance)
  • Security: CISO or delegate (data protection, incident response)
  • Business: 1-2 department heads (use case prioritization)
  • Ethics: External advisor or designated internal role
  • Finance: CFO delegate (budget, ROI tracking)

Meeting Cadence

  • Monthly: Review new AI use cases, vendor changes, incidents
  • Quarterly: Policy updates, compliance audit, budget review
  • Annually: Full governance framework review, board report

Decision Authority

DecisionAuthority Level
New AI tool (< $5K/year)Department head + security review
New AI tool (> $5K/year)Governance committee approval
Customer-facing AICommittee + legal + CEO sign-off
AI incident responseSecurity lead (immediate) → Committee (48h review)

6. Vendor Contract Checklist

Before signing any AI vendor contract, confirm:

  • Data processing agreement (DPA) signed
  • Your data is NOT used for model training (or explicit opt-out confirmed)
  • Data residency requirements met (specify regions)
  • Indemnification clause covers AI-generated output liability
  • SLA includes uptime, latency, and support response time
  • Exit clause: data export format, deletion timeline, transition support
  • Security certifications current and verified (not expired)
  • Incident notification timeline specified (72h or less)
  • Subprocessor list provided with change notification rights
  • Insurance coverage for AI-specific risks confirmed
  • Price lock or cap on increases for contract duration
  • Right to audit (or audit report access)

7. Board Reporting Template

Quarterly AI Governance Report

AI GOVERNANCE REPORT — Q[X] [YEAR]

1. AI PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
   - Active AI systems: [count]
   - New deployments this quarter: [count]
   - Retired/replaced: [count]
   - Total AI spend: $[amount] (vs budget: $[amount])

2. RISK DASHBOARD
   - High-risk systems: [count] — all compliant: [Y/N]
   - Open incidents: [count] — resolved this quarter: [count]
   - Shadow AI detections: [count] — remediated: [count]
   - Compliance gaps: [list]

3. VALUE DELIVERED
   - Hours saved: [estimate]
   - Revenue attributed to AI: $[amount]
   - Cost reduction: $[amount]
   - Customer satisfaction impact: [metric]

4. KEY DECISIONS NEEDED
   - [Decision 1: context + recommendation]
   - [Decision 2: context + recommendation]

5. NEXT QUARTER PRIORITIES
   - [Priority 1]
   - [Priority 2]

8. Incident Response for AI Systems

AI-Specific Incident Categories

CategoryExampleResponse Time
Data breach via AIModel leaks PII in outputImmediate — invoke security IR plan
Hallucination causing harmWrong medical/legal/financial advice acted on4h — document, notify affected parties
Bias detectedDiscriminatory output in hiring/lending24h — suspend system, audit, remediate
Prompt injectionAttacker manipulates AI behaviorImmediate — block vector, patch
Cost overrunRunaway API calls4h — rate limit, investigate, cap
Vendor incidentProvider breach or outagePer vendor SLA — activate backup

Post-Incident Review Template

  1. What happened (factual timeline)
  2. Impact (who/what affected, cost, duration)
  3. Root cause (not blame — systems thinking)
  4. Fixes applied (immediate + permanent)
  5. Policy/process changes needed
  6. Board notification required? (Y/N + rationale)

Cost of NOT Having AI Governance

Company SizeAnnual Risk Without Governance
15-50 employees$50K-$200K (shadow AI waste, compliance fines)
50-200 employees$200K-$800K (data incidents, vendor lock-in, redundant tools)
200-1000 employees$800K-$3M (regulatory penalties, IP exposure, audit failures)
1000+ employees$3M-$15M+ (class action, regulatory enforcement, reputational damage)

90-Day Implementation Roadmap

Month 1: Foundation

  • Draft acceptable use policy
  • Inventory all AI systems in use (including shadow AI)
  • Classify data flowing through each system
  • Identify governance committee members

Month 2: Controls

  • Finalize and distribute AUP
  • Implement vendor evaluation scorecard for new purchases
  • Set up AI incident response procedures
  • Begin regulatory compliance mapping

Month 3: Operationalize

  • First governance committee meeting
  • Deliver first board report
  • Establish monitoring for shadow AI
  • Schedule quarterly policy review cycle

Built by AfrexAI — AI operations infrastructure for mid-market companies.

Get the full industry-specific context pack for your sector ($47): https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/

Calculate your AI automation ROI: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/

Set up your AI agent workforce in 5 minutes: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/agent-setup/

Need all 10 industry packs? $197 for the complete bundle: https://buy.stripe.com/aEUaGJ2Xd0rI6zKfZ7

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

name: 4d-compression-core version: 1.0.2 description: "把长内容压缩成结构化向量——节省 60-80% Token,保留核心信息" metadata: { "openclaw": { "emoji": "🌀", "requires": { "bins": ["jq", "awk"] }, "triggers": ["压缩", "4d",...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

modbender/skill-library-mcp162026年9月28日 更新

Use cheap, TEE-verified AI models from the 0G Compute Network as OpenClaw providers. Discover available models and compare pricing vs OpenRouter, verify provider integrity via hardware attestation (Intel TDX), manage your 0G wallet and sub-accounts, and configure models in OpenClaw with one workflow. Supports DeepSeek, GLM-5, Qwen, and other models available on the 0G marketplace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

modbender/skill-library-mcp162026年9月28日 更新

Send and receive P2P messages using disposable numbers and PINs. No servers, no accounts. Use for human notifications, approval flows, and agent-to-agent communication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

modbender/skill-library-mcp162026年9月28日 更新

0xarchive

無料

Query historical crypto market data from 0xArchive across Hyperliquid, Lighter.xyz, and HIP-3. Covers orderbooks, trades, candles, funding rates, open interest, liquidations, and data quality. Use when the user asks about crypto market data, orderbooks, trades, funding rates, or historical prices on Hyperliquid, Lighter.xyz, or HIP-3.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

modbender/skill-library-mcp162026年9月28日 更新

0xwork

無料

Find and complete paid tasks on the 0xWork decentralized marketplace (Base chain, USDC escrow). Use when: the agent wants to earn money/USDC by doing work, discover available tasks, claim a bounty, submit deliverables, check earnings or wallet balance, or set up as a 0xWork worker. Task categories: Writing, Research, Social, Creative, Code, Data. NOT for: posting tasks (use the website), managing the 0xWork platform, or frontend development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

modbender/skill-library-mcp162026年9月28日 更新

Patterns and practices that dramatically accelerate development velocity. Covers parallel execution, automation, feedback loops, workflow optimization, and anti-pattern avoidance. Use when starting projects, planning sprints, optimizing workflows, or onboarding developers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

modbender/skill-library-mcp162026年9月28日 更新

modbender のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する