本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

assumption-audit

Surface the hidden assumptions a plan or belief rests on, then test what happens when each one is wrong. Use when asked what am I assuming here, check my assumptions, what if I'm wrong about, or stress-test my thinking. Produces the unstated assumptions your conclusion depends on (ranked by how load-bearing they are), a flip of each to see which one breaking would change everything, and the cheapest way to check the riskiest ones — because the assumption you didn't know you were making is what sinks plans.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Assumption Audit

Every plan sits on a stack of assumptions, and the dangerous ones are invisible — you don't question what you don't notice you believe. This drags them into the light, ranks them by how much weight they carry, and flips the load-bearing ones to see which single wrong assumption would collapse the whole thing. Then it tells you the cheapest way to check that one before you bet on it.

What This Skill Produces

  • The assumption list — the unstated beliefs your plan/conclusion depends on, including the ones you didn't realize you were making
  • Load-bearing ranking — which assumptions, if wrong, barely matter vs. which would collapse everything
  • The flip test — for the critical ones, what actually happens if they're false
  • The cheap check — the fastest, lowest-cost way to test the riskiest assumption before committing

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The plan, belief, or conclusion — what you want audited
  • Your reasoning — how you got there (reveals the assumptions)
  • What's at stake — so we know how hard to test
  • What you're treating as certain — the beliefs you're most confident in (often the riskiest)

Framework: Surface, Rank, Flip, Test

  1. Extract the assumptions. Read the reasoning and name every belief it depends on — especially the quiet ones stated as fact.
  2. Include the invisible ones. Push for the assumptions so baked-in they're never questioned ("people will want this," "this will keep working," "I'll have the time").
  3. Rank by load. Which assumptions, if false, barely change the conclusion? Which would collapse it? Focus on the load-bearing ones.
  4. Flip the critical ones. For each high-load assumption, follow through what happens if it's actually wrong.
  5. Find the cheap check. For the riskiest, name the fastest, lowest-cost way to test it before betting on it.

Output Format

Auditing: [the plan/belief]

Assumptions it rests on

AssumptionLoad-bearing?If it's wrong…
[belief]🔴 collapses / 🟡 shifts / 🟢 minor[consequence]

The riskiest one: [the assumption most likely wrong AND most load-bearing]. Cheapest way to check it: [a fast, low-cost test].

Quality Checks

  • Assumptions are actually surfaced, including invisible ones
  • Each is ranked by how load-bearing it is
  • The critical assumptions are flipped to show consequences
  • The riskiest (wrong × load-bearing) is identified
  • A cheap, concrete check is proposed for it

Anti-Patterns

  • Only listing obvious assumptions and missing the buried ones.
  • Treating all assumptions as equally important.
  • Naming risks without flipping to see what breaking them does.
  • No cheap test — leaving the person to just bet on it.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "What am I assuming in this plan?"
  • "Check my assumptions about this business idea."
  • "Stress-test my thinking here — what if I'm wrong?"
  • "I'm sure this will work — what am I not questioning?"
  • "What hidden assumption could sink this?"

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

mohitagw15856 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する