本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

audited-boundary-check

Use when asked to check whether a figure is audited, which headline numbers sit outside the audited accounts, what 'adjusted' or 'underlying' means in this report, or who is vouching for the numbers in the highlights. For every headline figure in the highlights, chairman's statement and CEO review of an uploaded annual report, states whether it sits inside or outside the audited statements and what was added or removed versus the nearest audited number. Produces a boundary table, the list of figures outside the boundary, and a plain-English summary of who is vouching for what. Educational, not financial advice.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Audited Boundary Check Skill

Draws the line the report's front half blurs: which headline numbers an auditor signed off, which ones the company chose, and exactly what changed between the two.

What This Skill Produces

  • The audit boundary: which pages and statements the opinion covers, and the opinion type
  • A boundary table covering every headline figure in the highlights, chairman's statement and CEO review
  • The outside-the-boundary list, each figure bridged to its nearest audited equivalent
  • A plain-English summary of who is vouching for what

Required Inputs

  • An uploaded annual report PDF. Hard requirement: if none is attached, ask and stop.
  • Optional: which sections to scan if the learner wants to go beyond the default three (highlights, chairman's statement, CEO review).

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Which of these headline numbers are actually audited?"
  • "What does 'adjusted operating profit' leave out in this report?"
  • "Is the growth figure on page 2 inside the accounts or made up by management?"
  • "Who is vouching for the numbers in the highlights?"
  • "Run an audited boundary check on this annual report"

Hard Rules

  1. Every figure carries (p. N). A figure with no page is a defect.
  2. A figure that cannot be located in the audited pages, and has no company-provided reconciliation, gets "nearest audited equivalent: not disclosed in this report" — never a reasoned guess.
  3. "Audited" means the figure appears, in that form, on a page the audit opinion states it covers. Arithmetic on audited figures (a growth %, a margin) is derived, not audited, and is classified outside.
  4. Never call an outside figure wrong, misleading, or fake. The skill describes the boundary; it does not judge intent.
  5. No buy, sell, or valuation opinion.

Process

  1. Find the audit report (p. N). Record: auditor name; opinion type (unqualified / qualified / adverse / disclaimer, or the local equivalent); the sentence stating which pages or statements the opinion covers; and the "other information" paragraph confirming the auditor read but did not audit the front half. If any element is absent, write "not disclosed in this report".
  2. Draw the boundary: list the audited statements and their pages; everything else is outside.
  3. Harvest every headline figure from the highlights, chairman's statement and CEO review: every currency amount, percentage, ratio, count, or ranking. Do not skip small ones.
  4. Classify each figure: Inside (appears verbatim on an audited page), Derived (arithmetic on inside figures — show the arithmetic), Outside (adjusted, underlying, like-for-like, constant-currency, pro-forma, KPI, operational metric, market claim).
  5. Bridge each Outside figure to its nearest audited equivalent using the company's own reconciliation table if one exists (p. N); list every item added or removed with its amount. If no reconciliation exists, say so.
  6. Write the vouching summary.

Output Format

Audited Boundary Check: [company, period]

The boundary

  • Auditor: [name] (p. N) · Opinion: [type] (p. N)
  • Covers: [statements and pages, quoted] (p. N)
  • Front-half status: [quote or paraphrase of the other-information paragraph] (p. N)

Boundary table — one row per headline figure, in the order they appear:

Figure (as printed, page)Audited?Nearest audited equivalent (page)What differs
e.g. Adjusted EBITDA £412m (p. 2)No — OutsideOperating profit £298m (p. 61)+ D&A £71m, + exceptional items £38m, + share-based pay £5m (recon p. 34)
e.g. Revenue £2,104m (p. 2)Yes — InsideSame (p. 60)—
e.g. Revenue growth 8% (p. 3)No — Derived£2,104m ÷ £1,948m − 1 (p. 60)Arithmetic on audited figures; check the prior year is not restated

Audited? takes exactly one of: Yes — Inside, No — Derived, No — Outside.

Figures outside the boundary — numbered list, one line each: figure, page, what was added or removed with amounts, and whether the company reconciled it (p. N) or "no reconciliation disclosed in this report". Group operational metrics (customers, NPS, market share, employee counts) at the end under No audited equivalent exists.

Who is vouching for what — exactly three short paragraphs:

  1. The auditor vouches for: [the statements listed], to the standard of [opinion type]; what an unqualified opinion does and does not mean in one sentence.
  2. The directors vouch for the whole report, including every Outside figure; name the directors' responsibility statement page or "not disclosed in this report".
  3. Nobody independent vouches for: [list the Outside and operational figures]; the reader is trusting management's definitions, which can change year to year.

End verbatim: "Educational, not financial advice. Decisions with real money belong with a regulated adviser."

Quality Checks

  • The audit opinion page, type, and covered pages are quoted or marked not disclosed — pass/fail
  • Every currency amount, percentage, ratio, and count in the three scanned sections has a row — pass/fail
  • Every row uses one of the three exact Audited? values — pass/fail
  • Every Outside row names its nearest audited equivalent with a page, or says not disclosed — pass/fail
  • Every bridge lists items with amounts, not just labels — pass/fail
  • Derived rows show their arithmetic — pass/fail
  • No row uses "misleading", "fake", "inflated", or similar — pass/fail
  • The vouching summary has exactly three paragraphs — pass/fail
  • The disclaimer line is the final line, verbatim — pass/fail

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not treat "adjusted" as a synonym for dishonest; describe what was removed and let the reader decide
  • Do not treat "audited" as a synonym for correct; the opinion is on material fairness, not on every figure
  • Do not assume the front half is unaudited without quoting the other-information paragraph or marking it not disclosed
  • Do not bridge a figure from memory of what companies usually adjust; use this report's reconciliation or say none exists
  • Do not skip the small numbers; a headcount or NPS claim is exactly the kind of figure nobody independent checks

Related Skills in This Bundle

annual-report-tutor (the full walk), profit-to-cash-walk (bridge profit to cash), company-compare-same-definitions (two reports), investing-vocabulary-explainer (define any term).

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

mohitagw15856 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する