本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

client-red-flags

Spot a bad client before you sign — the warning signs of the projects that turn into unpaid, scope-creeping nightmares, and how to screen, price, or decline them. Use when asked is this client a red flag, should I take this client, screening a difficult client, or how to avoid bad clients. Produces a read on the warning signs present (haggling, vagueness, disrespect, urgency, unrealistic expectations), what each predicts, screening questions to ask before committing, protective terms if you proceed anyway, and how to decline gracefully — so you avoid the clients who cost more than they pay.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Client Red Flags

Experienced freelancers know: the worst projects announce themselves early. The client who haggles hard before you start, can't describe what they want, disrespects your time, or needs it "yesterday" tends to become the one who scope-creeps, pays late, and drains your energy. This reads the warning signs, tells you what they predict, and helps you screen, protect, or walk — before you're trapped.

What This Skill Produces

  • A red-flag read — the warning signs present in this prospect and what each tends to predict (aggressive haggling → payment/scope issues; vagueness → endless revisions; disrespect early → worse later; false urgency → chaos)
  • Screening questions — what to ask before committing to surface the risks (budget, decision-maker, success definition, timeline realism)
  • Protective terms — if you proceed, the contract/process safeguards (deposit, milestone payments, tight scope, kill fee) that reduce the risk
  • A proceed / protect / decline call — a judgment based on the severity and your situation
  • A graceful decline — how to say no professionally without burning the bridge

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The prospect — how they've behaved so far (messages, calls, the ask)
  • The project — what they want, budget signals, timeline
  • The signs — anything that's given you pause
  • Your situation — how much you need the work (affects risk tolerance)
  • Your terms — what protections you can put in place

Framework: Read The Signs, Screen, Protect Or Pass

  1. Recognize the classic flags. Aggressive pre-start haggling, vague or shifting requirements, disrespect for your time/expertise, unrealistic timelines/expectations, "this'll lead to more work" in lieu of pay, and reluctance to sign or deposit.
  2. Translate to prediction. Each flag tends to forecast a specific future problem — name it so the decision is informed, not just a bad feeling.
  3. Screen before committing. Ask about budget, who decides, what success looks like, and timeline — the answers reveal risk. A prospect who won't engage is itself a signal.
  4. Protect if you proceed. For borderline cases you still want, use a deposit, milestone payments, a tightly-scoped contract, and clear change/revision terms.
  5. Decline gracefully when warranted. Some clients cost more than they pay — say no professionally, briefly, without insult, and keep the door open.
  6. Weigh your reality. Desperation lowers standards; factor honestly how much you need the work, but know the true cost of a nightmare client.

Output Format

Client screen: [prospect behavior] · project [x]

Red flags present: [flag → what it predicts] (e.g. haggling hard → likely payment/scope trouble). Screen with: ["what's the budget?" · "who signs off?" · "what does success look like?" · "is that timeline firm?"]. If you proceed — protect: [deposit · milestone payments · tight scope · change/revision terms · kill fee]. Call: [take it / take it with protections / decline] — because [severity + your situation]. Graceful decline: "[brief, professional no]".

Quality Checks

  • Identifies the specific red flags present
  • Translates each into what it tends to predict
  • Provides screening questions to surface risk before committing
  • Offers protective terms for borderline cases
  • Gives a clear proceed/protect/decline call
  • Includes a graceful, professional decline

Anti-Patterns

  • Ignoring early warning signs because you want the work.
  • A vague bad feeling with no specific flag named.
  • Proceeding with no protective terms on a risky client.
  • Taking every client regardless of cost.
  • Declining rudely and burning a bridge.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Is this client a red flag? They're haggling before we've even started."
  • "Should I take this project? Something feels off about the client."
  • "How do I screen out bad clients?"
  • "This prospect can't tell me what they want — should I be worried?"
  • "Help me decline a client politely."

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

mohitagw15856 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する