本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

college-app-parent-guide

Support a teenager through college applications without taking them over — the parent's actual jobs (logistics, finances, emotional ballast), the ownership lines that keep the application theirs, and the scripts for the hard moments. Use when asked how do I help my kid with college apps, how involved should I be, my teenager won't start their essays, or we disagree about the college list. Produces the role split, the family timeline, the money conversation framework, and the scripts for deadlock, rejection, and the essay you must not write.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

College App Parent Guide Skill

The college application is a project with two failure modes at home: the parent who runs it (producing an application that got in somewhere the student never chose, written in a voice admissions readers recognize as forty-five years old) and the parent who vanishes (leaving a seventeen-year-old to solo-manage a dozen deadlines and a five-figure decision). The working role is specific: the parent owns logistics, money truth, and emotional ballast; the student owns the list, the essays, and the clicks. This skill draws those lines, builds the shared timeline, and scripts the moments where the lines get tested.

What This Skill Produces

  • The role split — parent jobs vs. student jobs, explicit enough to end the daily renegotiation
  • The family timeline — deadlines mapped backward with the check-in cadence that replaces nagging
  • The money conversation — the budget truth told early, the net-price-vs-sticker decode, the constraint framing that isn't a bombshell in April
  • The scripts — the stalled student, the list disagreement, the rejection day, and the essay-help boundary

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • Where in the cycle — junior-year planning, summer-before, mid-application crunch, or decisions-in-hand; the guide reshapes per stage
  • The student, honestly — self-starter or avoidant, what they say they want, and how much they've actually done (the gap between those last two is the most common situation)
  • The family's real constraints — what's affordable, geographic needs, and whether the constraints have been said out loud yet
  • The friction, if any — the fight that keeps happening; scripts get tuned to it

Framework: The Ownership Rules

  1. The split is jobs, not effort levels: Parent: the master deadline calendar, fee payments and waivers, visit logistics, financial documents, being the calm. Student: the list, every essay word, the applications themselves, asking teachers for recommendations. The parent may ask "what's due this week?"; the parent never does what's due this week. Post the split on the fridge; it ends more fights than any script.
  2. Money truth comes first, not last: "Here's what we can contribute; past that means loans, and here's what a loan really costs monthly" — said before the list forms, not after an acceptance. Decode sticker vs. net price (net-price calculators exist on every college site; run them together) and set the constraint as list-shaping, not dream-crushing: constraints stated early feel like facts; stated late they feel like betrayals.
  3. The essay line is bright: brainstorm questions — yes ("what's a moment you'd actually want a stranger to know about?"). Reading and reacting — yes ("this paragraph sounds like you; this one doesn't"). Writing or rewriting sentences — no, ever: admissions offices read thousands of essays and clock adult prose instantly, and the deeper cost is the student learning their own voice wasn't enough. When the essay stalls, the move is the statement-coach-style question, not the keyboard.
  4. Stalling is usually fear wearing procrastination: the script isn't "have you started?" (they know) — it's smaller scope plus scheduled company: "Sunday, 30 minutes, just the activities list, I'll be in the room paying bills." Momentum beats motivation. If the stall is total and lasting, the honest conversation is whether the student wants this path now — a gap year deliberately chosen beats four expensive drifting semesters, and a parent who can say that out loud gives the kid room to choose either way.
  5. Decisions are theirs; ballast is yours: on the list disagreement — parents get honest input and the money veto, spoken once, not weekly; within budget, the choice is the student's, because they serve the four years. On rejection day: no silver-lining speeches in hour one ("that's really disappointing, I'm sorry" and food beats "everything happens for a reason" by miles); the reframe conversation keeps for the weekend. The parent's composure is the message.

Output Format

College App Support Plan: [student, stage]

The Role Split (post it)

Yours: [the logistics/money/ballast list] · Theirs: [the list/essays/asks list] · The rule: you may ask about the calendar; you don't touch the keyboard.

The Timeline

[Backward from deadlines: tests, visits, asks, drafts, submissions · the weekly 20-minute check-in that replaces daily nagging]

The Money Conversation

[The contribution number and how to say it · net-price homework to do together · the loan-reality sentence]

The Scripts

Stalled: "[small scope + company]" · List fight: "[input once + money veto + their call]" · Essay ask: "[the react-don't-write line]" · Rejection day: "[hour-one script]"

Quality Checks

  • Every job in the split has exactly one owner, and essays are unambiguously the student's
  • The money constraint is scheduled to be said before the list solidifies
  • The check-in cadence is on the calendar so nagging has no vacuum to fill
  • Scripts for the stall address fear and scope, not character
  • The rejection script separates hour-one comfort from weekend reframing

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not write or rewrite essay sentences — readers detect it, and the student internalizes the wrong lesson either way
  • Do not spring the budget in April — a late constraint reads as betrayal; an early one reads as planning
  • Do not relitigate the list weekly — input once, veto on money, then it's theirs
  • Do not manage by ambush ("have you started?") — the calendar and the scheduled check-in are the system
  • Do not make an acceptance or rejection about the family's worth — the student is applying to college, not the household

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "How do I help my kid with college apps?"
  • "How involved should I be?"
  • "My teenager won't start their essays."
  • "We disagree about the college list."

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

mohitagw15856 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する