本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

context-switch-budget

Treat context switches as the budget line they are — the switch census (how fragmented the week really is), the batching moves that consolidate scattered same-kind work, the calendar defrag that turns Swiss cheese into slabs, and the switch-cost line for saying no. Use when asked my day is fragmented to death, count my context switches, batch my meetings and reviews, or defend against calendar Swiss cheese. Produces the fragmentation census, the batching plan, the defrag moves, and the protective phrases.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Context Switch Budget Skill

The calendar shows eight meetings totaling four hours and calls the other four "free" — but fifteen-minute gaps between meetings are free the way confetti is paper: technically yes, usable no. Each switch costs re-entry time (the mind reloads the last context for 10–20 minutes), and a day of eight switches can contain zero real work while looking half-empty. The budget discipline: census the week's actual switches (the number shocks reliably), batch the same-kind work (meetings to meeting-blocks, reviews to review-hours, chat to email-triage-system-style windows), defrag the calendar (consolidate the gaps into slabs worth having), and price new fragmentation at the door.

Not quite this? Use context-budget when you mean an LLM's context window and token budget.

What This Skill Produces

  • The switch census — the week's transitions counted and typed (meeting↔work, task↔task, interrupt-driven), with the fragmentation map
  • The batching plan — same-kind work consolidated: the meeting corridors, the review hour, the comms windows
  • The defrag moves — the specific reschedules that convert cheese-holes into slabs (deep-work-blocking receives them)
  • The door pricing — the phrases that protect the defragged shape ("Tuesday corridor?" as the default counter-offer)

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • A real week's calendar — last week, as it actually ran (including the unscheduled interruptions the user remembers); the census works on evidence
  • The work's kinds — what recurs: meetings, reviews, writing, admin, comms; batching needs the categories named
  • The movable vs. fixed — which meetings the user controls or can counter-propose (recurring-meeting-pruner verdicts feed this), and the team's collaboration-hours constraints
  • The interrupt sources — what punches through ad hoc (chat, drive-bys, "quick calls") — each gets a batching destination or a boundary

Framework: The Budget Rules

  1. Census first — the number is the intervention: count last week's switches (every transition between unlike work counts; every meeting-to-meeting gap under 30 minutes counts as a lost slab). The typical knowledge-week runs 30–50; seeing "41 switches, longest unbroken stretch: 52 minutes" reframes the problem from "I'm unproductive" to "my week is structurally incapable of depth" — which is true, and fixable.
  2. Batch by kind, on a rhythm: meetings compress into corridors (Tue/Thu afternoons — the counter-offer default) · reviews/approvals into a daily half-hour · comms into 2–3 windows · admin into one Friday hour. Same-kind work shares context; batching converts eight reloads into one.
  3. Defrag the residue: the gaps that remain after batching get consolidated — the two 45-minute holes become one 90-minute slab by moving one meeting ("could we do 2pm instead of 3?"— movers rarely mind, they just never think to ask). Slabs go to the deep-work design; the census re-runs in two weeks to verify the shape held.
  4. Interrupts get destinations, not resistance: the chat that punches through routes to the comms windows (with the office-hours-design never-waits line honored) · drive-bys get the warm deferral ("in the middle of a thing — grab me at 3?") · the genuinely-urgent keeps its lane, defined. Fighting interrupts case-by-case loses; routing them by class holds.
  5. Price fragmentation at the door: every incoming meeting request gets the corridor counter-offer by default ("Could this land Tuesday PM? I batch meetings there") — most acceptors don't care where, so the asker's shape wins by initiative. The switch-cost line, for when justification helps: "a 3pm call splits my only deep block — the 10am corridor keeps me sharp for it anyway."

Output Format

Switch Budget: [name] — last week: [N] switches, longest slab: [T]

The Census

[Switches by type · the fragmentation map (the week's shape drawn) · the shock number stated plainly]

The Batching Plan

Work kindBatch destinationCadence
[Meeting corridors · review hour · comms windows · admin hour]

The Defrag Moves

[The specific reschedules → the slabs created → assigned to (deep-work blocks)]

Door Pricing

[The corridor counter-offer, verbatim · the interrupt routing by class · the re-census date (T+2 weeks)]

Quality Checks

  • The census counted a real week, including sub-30-minute gaps as losses
  • Every recurring work-kind has a batch destination
  • Defrag moves are specific reschedules, not aspirations
  • Interrupt classes route somewhere legitimate
  • The re-census is scheduled to verify the shape held

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not read gap-time as free time — confetti isn't paper you can write on
  • Do not fight interrupts individually — route classes; case-by-case is whack-a-mole with your attention
  • Do not accept meeting times passively — the counter-offer wins by default because nobody else is playing
  • Do not batch into your peak hours — corridors go on the energy map's shoulders; peaks are for slabs
  • Do not defrag once — calendars re-fragment on schedule; the re-census is the maintenance

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "My day is fragmented to death."
  • "Count my context switches."
  • "Batch my meetings and reviews."
  • "Defend against calendar Swiss cheese."

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

mohitagw15856 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する