本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

contractor-dispute

Handle a dispute with a contractor — unfinished work, poor quality, overcharging, or a no-show — with a path that protects your money and your options. Use when asked to deal with a contractor dispute, my contractor did bad work / won't finish / overcharged, or how to get a builder to fix their work. Produces a read on your position (contract, payments, evidence), a firm-but-professional communication and demand path, documentation and payment-leverage guidance, and escalation options (mediation, licensing board, chargeback, small claims) — flagging that it's not legal advice.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Contractor Dispute

A contractor dispute is stressful because your home and your money are both on the line. The winning approach isn't a shouting match — it's leverage: a clear record of the agreement and the problems, a professional demand with a deadline, careful use of any unpaid balance, and knowing the escalation routes. This lays that out so you push for a fix without torching your position.

What This Skill Produces

  • A position read — where you stand based on the contract/agreement, what's been paid, and the evidence you have
  • The communication & demand — a firm, professional message stating the problem, the fix required, and a deadline
  • Documentation guidance — the photos, contract, messages, payment records, and a defect list to assemble
  • Payment leverage — how any remaining balance or retention is your strongest lever (and the risks of withholding)
  • Escalation options — mediation, the licensing/trade body, a card chargeback, small claims, or a lien response — matched to the situation
  • A boundary — this isn't legal advice; for big sums or liens, get a professional

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • The problem — unfinished, defective, overcharged, no-show, or gone AWOL
  • The agreement — written contract/quote, scope, and payment terms
  • Payments — what's paid, what's outstanding, any deposit/retention
  • Evidence — photos, messages, the defect specifics
  • Your goal — get it finished/fixed, a partial refund, or to end it and move on

Framework: Document, Demand, Leverage, Escalate

  1. Establish your position. What did the agreement promise, what's been paid, and what's actually wrong — this determines your leverage before you do anything.
  2. Document thoroughly. Photograph defects, list them specifically against the agreed scope, and gather the contract, quotes, and all communications.
  3. Demand professionally. A calm written message stating the specific problems, the required remedy, and a reasonable deadline — not an angry call — creates a record and often works.
  4. Use payment as leverage carefully. An unpaid balance or retention is your strongest lever; but understand the risks and terms before withholding, and never pay in full for incomplete work.
  5. Escalate proportionately. Mediation, the licensing/consumer body, a chargeback (if paid by card), or small claims — pick the route that fits, and respond properly to any lien threat.
  6. Know the limit. Large sums, liens, or a stonewalling contractor may need a lawyer — flag it.

Output Format

Contractor dispute: [problem] · paid [x]/[total] · agreement: [written?]

Your position: [leverage from contract + payments + evidence]. Document: [defect list vs scope · photos · contract/quotes · all messages · payment records]. Demand (written)

[Specific problems · the fix required · a reasonable deadline · professional tone]. Payment leverage: [unpaid balance/retention as lever — risks of withholding · don't pay in full for incomplete work]. Escalate: [mediation → licensing/consumer body → chargeback → small claims]; respond to any lien via [x].

Not legal advice. For large sums, liens, or a stonewalling contractor, consult a professional.

Quality Checks

  • Establishes the person's position from contract/payments/evidence
  • Emphasizes documenting defects against the agreed scope
  • Provides a professional written demand with a deadline
  • Explains payment leverage and its risks
  • Matches escalation options to the situation
  • Flags not-legal-advice for serious cases

Anti-Patterns

  • An angry phone call with no written record.
  • Paying in full for incomplete or defective work.
  • Withholding payment recklessly without understanding the terms/risks.
  • No documentation — gutting any future claim.
  • Jumping to a lawyer for something a demand letter could fix (or ignoring one for a lien).

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "My contractor took the deposit and hasn't finished — what do I do?"
  • "The work is shoddy and they won't come back to fix it."
  • "I think my builder overcharged me. How do I dispute it?"
  • "Write a firm message demanding my contractor fix their work."
  • "Contractor's threatening a lien — what are my options?"

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1,4412026年10月13日 更新

mohitagw15856 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する