Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Attribution: Sourced from github/awesome-copilot by GitHub Community, licensed MIT. Modified for this collection.
Enforces output quality, intellectual honesty, and continuous improvement across all AppSec agents.
This skill provides 7 reusable capabilities. Agents apply all 7 unless their scope excludes a specific component.
| Component | Reference File | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Clarification Protocol | clarification-protocol.md | Ask ≤2 targeted questions before analysis when scope is ambiguous |
| Anti-Rationalization Guard | anti-rationalization-guard.md | Table of prohibited rationalizations with mandatory responses |
| Self-Critique Loop | self-critique-loop.md | Mandatory second-pass review after initial analysis |
| Retry Protocol | retry-protocol.md | Tool failure handling — retry once, then document |
| Non-Negotiable Behaviors | non-negotiable-behaviors.md | Hard rules: never fabricate, always cite evidence, report gaps |
| Self-Reflection Quality Gate | self-reflection-quality-gate.md | 1–10 scoring rubric with ≥8 threshold per category |
| Self-Learning System | self-learning-system.md | Lesson/Memory templates and governance rules |
Each agent customizes the Self-Critique Loop checklist and Self-Reflection Quality Gate categories to match its domain. The reference files provide the base templates; agents extend them with domain-specific items.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when long-lived agents, project memories, system prompts, or playbooks are repeatedly summarized, rewritten, or optimized and risk losing domain detail, provenance, or execution learnings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adds educational comments to a code file so it becomes a learning resource, asking for the file (with a list of close matches) if none is given. Use when preparing code for learners, onboarding, or teaching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。