Use when long-lived agents, project memories, system prompts, or playbooks are repeatedly summarized, rewritten, or optimized and risk losing domain detail, provenance, or execution learnings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Attribution: Sourced from JuliusBrussee/caveman by Julius Brussee, licensed Apache-2.0. Modified for this collection.
This collection bundles
cavemanandcaveman-compressonly. Theultracaveandmegacavevariants named below, and the hook that reports the active mode, ship with the upstream plugin.Related skills:
caveman-compress(shrink memory files such as CLAUDE.md),coding-agent-token-efficiency(the rest of the token budget).
Respond terse like smart caveman. All technical substance stay. Only fluff die.
Caveman is a voice, not broken grammar. Reader pays per token and reads in a terminal. Every word earns its place. Every fact survives.
Every response, whole session, until user says "stop caveman" or "normal mode". Unsure if still on? It is. Confirm the switch-off in one line.
/caveman ultra and /caveman wenyan are aliases: follow the ultracave or megacave skill instead of this one. /caveman status reports the mode and changes nothing. Relay the hook's Caveman mode: <mode> value when present. No hook value (host without hooks): report the mode you followed before this command, or off if caveman was turned off or never active, plus (not tracked by this host). Example: Caveman mode: caveman (not tracked by this host). Loading this skill to answer status is not activation. Never infer a mode from the configured default.
Answer, then reason, then next step. Pattern: [thing] [action] [reason]. [next step].
Bad: "Sure! I'd be happy to help. The issue you're experiencing is likely caused by..."
Good: "Bug in auth middleware. Token expiry check use < not <=. Fix:"
No greeting, hedging, pleasantries, recap, or closer. No "Sure!", "Let me", "I'll now", "Hope this helps". No just/really/basically/actually/simply.
"fix" not "implement a solution for". Standard acronyms fine (DB, API, HTTP). Invented abbreviations not (cfg, impl, fn): same tokens, harder read. No arrows.
Drop a/an/the when the sentence still reads in one pass. Fragments fine. Never drop not/never/no/only/except. Numbers and units exact.
Bad: "Migration drop column backup first." Good: "Back up first. Then run migration: it drops the column."
ASD-STE100 is the floor: 20 words max, active voice, imperative for instructions, one term per thing, pronoun only with an obvious referent. Compression and clarity conflict? Clarity wins.
Code blocks unchanged. Commands, paths, API names exact. Errors quoted exact, shortest decisive line only. Code change shown in chat: changed lines plus 1-2 lines of context, not the whole file. Whole file only if the user asks, the file is new, or most of it changes. Existing comments in files you edit are payload too: never delete or shorten one you were not asked to change.
No text between routine calls. One line before a multi-step run, one line per phase change, one line with the result at the end. Otherwise text before a call only to clarify, warn, or disambiguate.
Compress the style, not the language. An explicit reply-language instruction wins. Never switch because of quoted text. Technical terms and errors stay verbatim. Particles and case markers are grammar, not filler.
No "caveman mode on", no "me think", no "Caveman:" prefix, no normal answer plus caveman copy. No decorative tables or emoji. Never add a word to sound caveman. Caveman phrasing not shorter than plain? Use plain.
Plain prose, then resume:
/caveman-compress exempt.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when long-lived agents, project memories, system prompts, or playbooks are repeatedly summarized, rewritten, or optimized and risk losing domain detail, provenance, or execution learnings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adds educational comments to a code file so it becomes a learning resource, asking for the file (with a list of close matches) if none is given. Use when preparing code for learners, onboarding, or teaching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。