本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

rest-graphql-debug

Debugs REST and GraphQL APIs: unexpected status codes or bodies, auth failures (401/403, OAuth, API keys), schema mismatches, rate limits, pagination, and webhooks. Use when a request works in Postman but not in code, an integration test fails, or a callback misbehaves; not for UI rendering or DB tuning.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md15.0 KB
  • LICENSE1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

API Testing & Debugging

Drive REST and GraphQL diagnosis through shell commands for curl, short Python scripts for requests, and current vendor docs when available. Isolate the failing layer before guessing at the fix.

When to Use

  • API returns unexpected status or body
  • Auth fails (401/403 after token refresh, OAuth, API key)
  • Works in Postman but fails in code
  • Webhook / callback integration debugging
  • Building or reviewing API integration tests
  • Rate limiting or pagination issues

Skip for UI rendering, DB query tuning, or DNS/firewall infra (escalate).

Core Principle

Isolate the layer, then fix. A 200 OK can hide broken data. A 500 can mask a one-character auth typo. Walk the chain in order; never skip a step.

1. Connectivity   → can we reach the host at all?
1.5 Timeouts      → connect-slow vs read-slow?
2. TLS/SSL        → cert valid and trusted?
3. Auth           → credentials correct and unexpired?
4. Request format → payload shape match server expectations?
5. Response parse → does our code accept what came back?
6. Semantics      → does the data mean what we assume?

5-Minute Quickstart

REST via shell

# Verbose request/response exchange
curl -v https://api.example.com/users/1

# POST with JSON
curl -X POST https://api.example.com/users \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -d '{"name":"test","email":"test@example.com"}'

# Headers only
curl -sI https://api.example.com/health

# Pretty-print JSON
curl -s https://api.example.com/users | python3 -m json.tool

GraphQL via shell

curl -X POST https://api.example.com/graphql \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -d '{"query":"{ user(id: 1) { name email } }"}'

GraphQL gotcha: servers often return HTTP 200 even when the query failed. Always inspect the errors field regardless of status code:

import os, requests
resp = requests.post(
    "https://api.example.com/graphql",
    json={"query": "{ user(id: 1) { name email } }"},
    headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['TOKEN']}"},
    timeout=10,
)
data = resp.json()
if data.get("errors"):
    for err in data["errors"]:
        print(f"GraphQL error: {err['message']} (path: {err.get('path')})")
print(data.get("data"))

Python (requests) via Python script

import requests
resp = requests.get(
    "https://api.example.com/users/1",
    headers={"Authorization": "Bearer <TOKEN>"},
    timeout=(3.05, 30),  # (connect, read)
)
print(resp.status_code, dict(resp.headers))
print(resp.text[:500])

Layered Debug Flow

Step 1 — Connectivity

nslookup api.example.com
curl -v --connect-timeout 5 https://api.example.com/health

Failures: DNS not resolving, firewall, VPN required, proxy missing.

Step 1.5 — Timeouts

Distinguish can't reach from reaches but slow:

curl -w "dns:%{time_namelookup}s connect:%{time_connect}s tls:%{time_appconnect}s ttfb:%{time_starttransfer}s total:%{time_total}s\n" \
  -o /dev/null -s https://api.example.com/endpoint

In Python, always pass a tuple timeout — requests has no default and will hang forever:

import requests
from requests.exceptions import ConnectTimeout, ReadTimeout
try:
    requests.get(url, timeout=(3.05, 30))
except ConnectTimeout:
    print("Cannot reach host — DNS, firewall, VPN")
except ReadTimeout:
    print("Connected but server is slow")

Diagnosis: high time_connect is network/firewall; high time_starttransfer with low time_connect is a slow server.

Step 2 — TLS/SSL

curl -vI https://api.example.com 2>&1 | grep -E "SSL|subject|expire|issuer"

Failures: expired cert, self-signed, hostname mismatch, missing CA bundle. Use -k only for ad-hoc debug, never in code.

Step 3 — Authentication

# Token validity check
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" https://api.example.com/me

# Decode JWT exp claim — handles base64url padding correctly
import json, base64, os
tok = os.environ["TOKEN"]
payload = tok.split(".")[1]
payload += "=" * (-len(payload) % 4)
print(json.dumps(json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(payload)), indent=2))

Checklist:

  • Token expired? (exp claim in JWT)
  • Right scheme? Bearer vs Basic vs Token vs X-Api-Key
  • Right environment? Staging key on prod is a classic
  • API key in header vs query param (?api_key=…)?

Step 4 — Request Format

curl -v -X POST https://api.example.com/endpoint \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"key":"value"}' 2>&1

Content-Type / body mismatch — the silent 415/400:

# WRONG — data= sends form-encoded, header lies
requests.post(url, data='{"k":"v"}', headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"})

# RIGHT — json= auto-sets header AND serializes
requests.post(url, json={"k": "v"})

# WRONG — Accept says XML, code calls .json()
requests.get(url, headers={"Accept": "text/xml"})

# RIGHT — let requests build multipart with boundary
requests.post(url, files={"file": open("doc.pdf", "rb")})

Common: form-encoded vs JSON, missing required fields, wrong HTTP method, unencoded query params.

Step 5 — Response Parsing

Always inspect content-type before calling .json():

import requests
resp = requests.post(url, json=payload, timeout=10)
print(f"status={resp.status_code}")
print(f"headers={dict(resp.headers)}")
ct = resp.headers.get("Content-Type", "")
if "application/json" in ct:
    print(resp.json())
else:
    print(f"unexpected content-type {ct!r}, body={resp.text[:500]!r}")

Failures: HTML error page where JSON expected, empty body, wrong charset.

Step 6 — Semantic Validation

Parsed cleanly — but is the data correct?

  • Does "status": "active" mean what your code thinks?
  • ID in response matches the one requested?
  • Timestamps in expected timezone?
  • Pagination returning all results, or just page 1?

HTTP Status Playbook

401 Unauthorized — credentials missing or invalid

  1. Authorization header actually present? (curl -v to confirm)
  2. Token correct and unexpired?
  3. Right auth scheme? (Bearer vs Basic vs Token)
  4. Some APIs use query param (?api_key=…) instead of header.

403 Forbidden — authenticated but not authorized

  1. Token has the required scopes/permissions?
  2. Resource owned by a different account?
  3. IP allowlist blocking you?
  4. CORS in browser? (check Access-Control-Allow-Origin)

404 Not Found — resource doesn't exist or URL is wrong

  1. Path correct? (trailing slash, typo, version prefix)
  2. Resource ID exists?
  3. Right API version (/v1/ vs /v2/)?
  4. Right base URL (staging vs prod)?

409 Conflict — state collision

  1. Resource already exists (duplicate create)?
  2. Stale ETag / If-Match?
  3. Concurrent modification by another process?

422 Unprocessable Entity — valid JSON, invalid data

The error body usually names the bad fields. Check:

  • Field types (string vs int, date format)
  • Required vs optional
  • Enum values inside the allowed set

429 Too Many Requests — rate limited

Check Retry-After and X-RateLimit-* headers. Exponential backoff:

import time, requests

def with_backoff(method, url, **kwargs):
    for attempt in range(5):
        resp = requests.request(method, url, **kwargs)
        if resp.status_code != 429:
            return resp
        wait = int(resp.headers.get("Retry-After", 2 ** attempt))
        time.sleep(wait)
    return resp

5xx — server-side, usually not your fault

  • 500 — server bug. Capture correlation ID, file with provider.
  • 502 — upstream down. Backoff + retry.
  • 503 — overloaded / maintenance. Check status page.
  • 504 — upstream timeout. Reduce payload or raise timeout.

For all 5xx: backoff with jitter, alert on persistence.

Pagination & Idempotency

Pagination. Verify you're getting all results. Look for next_cursor, next_page, total_count. Two patterns:

  • Offset (?limit=100&offset=200) — simple, can skip items if data shifts.
  • Cursor (?cursor=abc123) — preferred for live or large datasets.

Idempotency. For non-idempotent operations (POST), send Idempotency-Key: <uuid> so retries don't double-charge / double-create. Mandatory for payments and orders.

Contract Validation

Catch schema drift before it hits production:

import requests

def validate_user(data: dict) -> list[str]:
    errors = []
    required = {"id": int, "email": str, "created_at": str}
    for field, expected in required.items():
        if field not in data:
            errors.append(f"missing field: {field}")
        elif not isinstance(data[field], expected):
            errors.append(f"{field}: want {expected.__name__}, got {type(data[field]).__name__}")
    return errors

resp = requests.get(f"{BASE}/users/1", headers=HEADERS, timeout=10)
issues = validate_user(resp.json())
if issues:
    print(f"contract violations: {issues}")

Run after API upgrades, when integrating new third parties, or in CI smoke tests.

Correlation IDs

Always capture the provider's request ID — fastest path to vendor support:

import requests
resp = requests.post(url, json=payload, headers=headers, timeout=10)
request_id = (
    resp.headers.get("X-Request-Id")
    or resp.headers.get("X-Trace-Id")
    or resp.headers.get("CF-Ray")  # Cloudflare
)
if resp.status_code >= 400:
    print(f"failed status={resp.status_code} req_id={request_id} ts={resp.headers.get('Date')}")

Vendor bug-report template:

Endpoint:    POST /api/v1/orders
Request ID:  req_abc123xyz
Timestamp:   2026-03-17T14:30:00Z
Status:      500
Expected:    201 with order object
Actual:      500 {"error":"internal server error"}
Repro:       curl -X POST … (auth: <REDACTED>)

Regression Test Template

Drop this into tests/ and run pytest tests/test_api_smoke.py -v:

import os, requests, pytest

BASE_URL = os.environ.get("API_BASE_URL", "https://api.example.com")
TOKEN    = os.environ.get("API_TOKEN", "")
HEADERS  = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {TOKEN}"}

class TestAPISmoke:
    def test_health(self):
        resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/health", timeout=5)
        assert resp.status_code == 200

    def test_list_users_returns_array(self):
        resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users", headers=HEADERS, timeout=10)
        assert resp.status_code == 200
        data = resp.json()
        assert isinstance(data.get("data", data), list)

    def test_get_user_required_fields(self):
        resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users/1", headers=HEADERS, timeout=10)
        assert resp.status_code in (200, 404)
        if resp.status_code == 200:
            user = resp.json()
            assert "id" in user and "email" in user

    def test_invalid_auth_returns_401(self):
        resp = requests.get(
            f"{BASE_URL}/users",
            headers={"Authorization": "Bearer invalid-token"},
            timeout=10,
        )
        assert resp.status_code == 401

Security

Token handling

  • Never log full tokens. Redact: Bearer <REDACTED>.
  • Never hardcode tokens in scripts. Read from environment variables such as os.environ["API_TOKEN"] or a local .env file that stays out of git.
  • Rotate immediately if a token surfaces in logs, error messages, or git history.

Safe logging

def redact_auth(headers: dict) -> dict:
    sensitive = {"authorization", "x-api-key", "cookie", "set-cookie"}
    return {k: ("<REDACTED>" if k.lower() in sensitive else v) for k, v in headers.items()}

Leak checklist

  • Credentials in URLs. API keys in query strings end up in server logs, browser history, referrer headers — use headers.
  • PII in error responses. 404 on /users/123 shouldn't reveal whether the user exists (enumeration).
  • Stack traces in prod. 500s shouldn't leak file paths, framework versions.
  • Internal hostnames/IPs. 10.x.x.x, internal-api.corp.local in error bodies.
  • Tokens echoed back. Some APIs include the auth token in error details. Verify they don't.
  • Verbose Server / X-Powered-By. Stack-info leaks. Note for security review.

Portable Tool Patterns

Shell — for curl, dig, openssl

curl -sI https://api.example.com
openssl s_client -connect api.example.com:443 -servername api.example.com </dev/null 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -noout -dates

Python — for multi-step flows

When debugging spans auth → fetch → paginate → validate, use a short Python script. Print concise status lines and keep full tokens out of logs:

import os, requests

token = os.environ["API_TOKEN"]
base  = "https://api.example.com"
H     = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"}

# 1. auth
me = requests.get(f"{base}/me", headers=H, timeout=10)
print(f"auth {me.status_code}")

# 2. paginate
all_users, cursor = [], None
while True:
    params = {"cursor": cursor} if cursor else {}
    r = requests.get(f"{base}/users", headers=H, params=params, timeout=10)
    body = r.json()
    all_users.extend(body["data"])
    cursor = body.get("next_cursor")
    if not cursor:
        break
print(f"users={len(all_users)}")

Vendor API Docs

Pull the spec for the endpoint you're debugging instead of guessing. Use the available browser, web search, or documentation lookup tool for the current environment.

For larger CRUD sweeps, run a focused test script or delegate only when the current agent environment provides an explicit subagent/delegation mechanism.

Output Format

When reporting findings:

## Finding
Endpoint: POST /api/v1/users
Status:   422 Unprocessable Entity
Req ID:   req_abc123xyz

## Repro
curl -X POST https://api.example.com/api/v1/users \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer <REDACTED>' \
  -d '{"name":"test"}'

## Root Cause
Missing required field `email`. Server validation rejects before processing.

## Fix
-d '{"name":"test","email":"test@example.com"}'

Related

  • systematic-debugging — once the failing API layer is isolated, root-cause your code
  • test-driven-development — write the regression test before shipping the fix

Source Attribution

Imported from NousResearch Hermes Agent optional skills (optional-skills/software-development/rest-graphql-debug) under the MIT license. Source: https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/tree/main/optional-skills/software-development/rest-graphql-debug

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when long-lived agents, project memories, system prompts, or playbooks are repeatedly summarized, rewritten, or optimized and risk losing domain detail, provenance, or execution learnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mouadja02/skills102026年10月16日 更新

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mouadja02/skills102026年10月16日 更新

Adds educational comments to a code file so it becomes a learning resource, asking for the file (with a list of close matches) if none is given. Use when preparing code for learners, onboarding, or teaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mouadja02/skills102026年10月16日 更新

Write, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mouadja02/skills102026年10月16日 更新

Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mouadja02/skills102026年10月16日 更新

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mouadja02/skills102026年10月16日 更新

mouadja02 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する