本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

automating-ioc-enrichment

Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source threat intelligence context using SOAR platforms, Python pipelines, or TIP playbooks to reduce analyst triage time and standardize enrichment outputs. Use when building automated enrichment workflows integrated with SIEM alerts, email submission pipelines, or bulk IOC processing from threat feeds. Activates for requests involving SOAR enrichment, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, TheHive, Python enrichment pipelines, or automated IOC processing.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md1.8 KB
  • scripts/agent.py7.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Automating IOC Enrichment

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Building a SOAR playbook that automatically enriches SIEM alerts with threat intelligence context before routing to analysts
  • Creating a Python pipeline for bulk IOC enrichment from phishing email submissions
  • Reducing analyst mean time to triage (MTTT) by pre-populating alert context with VT, Shodan, and MISP data

Do not use this skill for fully automated blocking decisions without human review — enrichment automation should inform decisions, not execute blocks autonomously for high-impact actions.

Prerequisites

  • SOAR platform (Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tines, or n8n) or Python 3.9+ environment
  • API keys: VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, Shodan, and at minimum one TIP (MISP or OpenCTI)
  • SIEM integration endpoint for alert consumption
  • Rate limit budgets documented per API (VT: 4/min free, 500/min enterprise)

Workflow

Step 1: Design Enrichment Pipeline Architecture

Define the enrichment flow for each IOC type:

SIEM Alert → Extract IOCs → Classify Type → Route to enrichment functions
  IP Address → AbuseIPDB + Shodan + VirusTotal IP + MISP
  Domain → VirusTotal Domain + PassiveTotal + Shodan + MISP
  URL → URLScan.io + VirusTotal URL + Google Safe Browse
  File Hash → VirusTotal Files + MalwareBazaar + MISP
→ Aggregate results → Calculate confidence score → Update alert → Notify analyst

Step 2: Implement Python Enrichment Functions

import requests
import time
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Optional

RATE_LIMIT_DELAY = 0.25  # 4 requests/second for VT free tier

@dataclass
class EnrichmentResult:
    ioc_value: str
    ioc_type: str
    vt_malicious: int = 0
    vt_total: int = 0
    abuse_confidence: int = 0
    shodan_ports: list = field(default_factory=list)
    misp_events: list = field(default_factory=list)
    confidence_score: int = 0

def enrich_ip(ip: str, vt_key: str, abuse_key: str, shodan_key: str) -> EnrichmentResult:
    result = EnrichmentResult(ip, "ip")

    # VirusTotal IP lookup
    vt_resp = requests.get(
        f"https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/ip_addresses/{ip}",
        headers={"x-apikey": vt_key}
    )
    if vt_resp.status_code == 200:
        stats = vt_resp.json()["data"]["attributes"]["last_analysis_stats"]
        result.vt_malicious = stats.get("malicious", 0)
        result.vt_total = sum(stats.values())

    time.sleep(RATE_LIMIT_DELAY)

    # AbuseIPDB
    abuse_resp = requests.get(
        "https://api.abuseipdb.com/api/v2/check",
        headers={"Key": abuse_key, "Accept": "application/json"},
        params={"ipAddress": ip, "maxAgeInDays": 90}
    )
    if abuse_resp.status_code == 200:
        result.abuse_confidence = abuse_resp.json()["data"]["abuseConfidenceScore"]

    # Calculate composite confidence score
    result.confidence_score = min(
        (result.vt_malicious / max(result.vt_total, 1)) * 60 +
        (result.abuse_confidence / 100) * 40, 100
    )

    return result

def enrich_hash(sha256: str, vt_key: str) -> EnrichmentResult:
    result = EnrichmentResult(sha256, "sha256")
    vt_resp = requests.get(
        f"https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/files/{sha256}",
        headers={"x-apikey": vt_key}
    )
    if vt_resp.status_code == 200:
        stats = vt_resp.json()["data"]["attributes"]["last_analysis_stats"]
        result.vt_malicious = stats.get("malicious", 0)
        result.vt_total = sum(stats.values())
        result.confidence_score = int((result.vt_malicious / max(result.vt_total, 1)) * 100)
    return result

Step 3: Build SOAR Playbook (Cortex XSOAR)

In Cortex XSOAR, create an enrichment playbook:

  1. Trigger: Alert created in SIEM (via webhook or polling)
  2. Extract IOCs: Use "Extract Indicators" task with regex patterns for IP, domain, URL, hash
  3. Parallel enrichment: Fan-out to multiple enrichment tasks simultaneously
  4. VT Enrichment: Call !vt-file-scan or !vt-ip-scan commands
  5. AbuseIPDB check: Call !abuseipdb-check-ip command
  6. MISP Lookup: Call !misp-search for cross-referencing
  7. Score aggregation: Python transform task computing composite score
  8. Conditional routing: If score ≥70 → High Priority queue; if 40–69 → Medium; <40 → Auto-close with note
  9. Alert enrichment: Write enrichment results to alert context for analyst view

Step 4: Handle Rate Limiting and Failures

import time
from functools import wraps

def rate_limited(max_per_second):
    min_interval = 1.0 / max_per_second
    def decorator(func):
        last_called = [0.0]
        @wraps(func)
        def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
            elapsed = time.time() - last_called[0]
            wait = min_interval - elapsed
            if wait > 0:
                time.sleep(wait)
            result = func(*args, **kwargs)
            last_called[0] = time.time()
            return result
        return wrapper
    return decorator

def retry_on_429(max_retries=3):
    def decorator(func):
        @wraps(func)
        def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
            for attempt in range(max_retries):
                response = func(*args, **kwargs)
                if response.status_code == 429:
                    retry_after = int(response.headers.get("Retry-After", 60))
                    time.sleep(retry_after)
                else:
                    return response
        return wrapper
    return decorator

Step 5: Metrics and Tuning

Track pipeline performance weekly:

  • Enrichment latency: Target <30 seconds from alert trigger to enriched output
  • API success rate: Target >99% (identify rate limit or outage events)
  • True positive rate: Track analyst overrides of automated confidence scores
  • Cost: Track API call volume against budget (VT Enterprise: $X per 1M lookups)

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
SOARSecurity Orchestration, Automation, and Response — platform for automating security workflows and integrating disparate tools
Enrichment PlaybookAutomated workflow sequence that adds contextual intelligence to raw security events
Rate LimitingAPI provider restrictions on request frequency (e.g., VT free: 4 requests/minute); pipelines must respect these limits
Composite Confidence ScoreSingle score aggregating signals from multiple enrichment sources using weighted formula
Fan-out PatternParallel execution of multiple enrichment queries simultaneously to minimize total enrichment latency

Tools & Systems

  • Cortex XSOAR (Palo Alto): Enterprise SOAR with 700+ marketplace integrations including VT, MISP, Shodan, and AbuseIPDB
  • Splunk SOAR (Phantom): SOAR platform with Python-based playbooks; native Splunk SIEM integration
  • Tines: No-code SOAR platform with webhook-driven automation; cost-effective for smaller teams
  • TheHive + Cortex: Open-source IR/enrichment platform with observable enrichment via Cortex analyzers

Common Pitfalls

  • Blocking on enrichment latency: If enrichment takes >5 minutes, analysts start working unenriched alerts, defeating the purpose. Set timeout limits and provide partial results.
  • No caching: Querying the same IOC 50 times generates unnecessary API costs. Cache enrichment results for 24 hours by default.
  • Ignoring API failures silently: Failed enrichment calls should be logged and trigger fallback logic, not silently produce empty results that appear as clean IOCs.
  • Automating blocks on enrichment score alone: Composite scores contain false positives; require human confirmation for blocking decisions against shared infrastructure.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する