本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

building-incident-response-dashboard

Builds real-time incident response dashboards in Splunk, Elastic, or Grafana to provide SOC analysts and leadership with situational awareness during active incidents, tracking affected systems, containment status, IOC spread, and response timeline. Use when IR teams need unified visibility during incident coordination and post-incident reporting.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md11.0 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.2 KB
  • scripts/agent.py7.2 KB
  • SKILL.es.md12.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Building Incident Response Dashboard

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • IR teams need real-time dashboards during active incidents for coordination and tracking
  • SOC leadership requires operational dashboards showing incident status and analyst workload
  • Post-incident reviews need visual timelines and impact assessments
  • Executive briefings require high-level incident metrics and trend analysis

Do not use for day-to-day SOC monitoring dashboards (use Incident Review instead) — IR dashboards are designed for active incident coordination and management reporting.

Prerequisites

  • SIEM platform (Splunk with Dashboard Studio, Elastic Kibana, or Grafana)
  • Notable event and incident data in SIEM (Splunk ES incident_review index)
  • Ticketing system integration (ServiceNow, Jira) for remediation tracking
  • Asset and identity lookup tables for context enrichment
  • Dashboard publishing access for SOC team and management distribution

Workflow

Step 1: Design Active Incident Dashboard Layout

Build a Splunk Dashboard Studio dashboard for active incident tracking:

<dashboard version="2" theme="dark">
  <label>Active Incident Response Dashboard</label>
  <description>Real-time tracking for IR-2024-0450</description>

  <row>
    <panel>
      <title>Incident Summary</title>
      <single>
        <search>
          <query>
| makeresults
| eval incident_id="IR-2024-0450",
       status="CONTAINMENT",
       severity="Critical",
       affected_hosts=7,
       contained_hosts=5,
       iocs_identified=23,
       hours_elapsed=round((now()-strptime("2024-03-15 14:00","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M"))/3600,1)
| table incident_id, status, severity, affected_hosts, contained_hosts, iocs_identified, hours_elapsed
          </query>
        </search>
      </single>
    </panel>
  </row>
</dashboard>

Step 2: Build Real-Time Affected Systems Panel

Track affected systems and their containment status:

| inputlookup ir_affected_systems.csv
| eval status_color = case(
    status="Contained", "#2ecc71",
    status="Compromised", "#e74c3c",
    status="Investigating", "#f39c12",
    status="Recovered", "#3498db",
    1=1, "#95a5a6"
  )
| stats count by status
| eval order = case(status="Compromised", 1, status="Investigating", 2,
                    status="Contained", 3, status="Recovered", 4)
| sort order
| table status, count

--- Detailed host table
| inputlookup ir_affected_systems.csv
| lookup asset_lookup_by_cidr ip AS host_ip OUTPUT category, owner, priority
| table hostname, host_ip, category, owner, status, containment_time,
        compromise_vector, analyst_assigned
| sort status, hostname

Step 3: Build IOC Tracking Panel

Monitor IOC spread across the environment:

--- IOCs identified during incident
index=* (src_ip IN ("185.234.218.50", "45.77.123.45") OR
         dest IN ("evil-c2.com", "malware-drop.com") OR
         file_hash IN ("a1b2c3d4...", "e5f6a7b8..."))
earliest="2024-03-14"
| stats count AS hits, dc(src_ip) AS unique_sources,
        dc(dest) AS unique_dests, latest(_time) AS last_seen
  by sourcetype
| sort - hits

--- IOC timeline
index=* (src_ip IN ("185.234.218.50") OR dest="evil-c2.com")
earliest="2024-03-14"
| timechart span=1h count by sourcetype

--- New IOC discovery tracking
| inputlookup ir_ioc_list.csv
| stats count by ioc_type, source, discovery_time
| sort discovery_time
| table discovery_time, ioc_type, ioc_value, source, status

Step 4: Build Response Timeline Panel

Create chronological incident timeline:

| inputlookup ir_timeline.csv
| sort _time
| eval phase = case(
    action_type="detection", "Detection",
    action_type="triage", "Triage",
    action_type="containment", "Containment",
    action_type="eradication", "Eradication",
    action_type="recovery", "Recovery",
    1=1, "Other"
  )
| eval phase_color = case(
    phase="Detection", "#e74c3c",
    phase="Triage", "#f39c12",
    phase="Containment", "#e67e22",
    phase="Eradication", "#2ecc71",
    phase="Recovery", "#3498db"
  )
| table _time, phase, action, analyst, details

Example timeline data:

_time,action_type,action,analyst,details
2024-03-15 14:00,detection,Alert triggered - Cobalt Strike beacon detected,splunk_es,Notable event NE-2024-08921
2024-03-15 14:12,triage,Alert triaged - confirmed true positive,analyst_jdoe,VT score 52/72 on beacon hash
2024-03-15 14:23,containment,Host WORKSTATION-042 isolated,analyst_jdoe,CrowdStrike network isolation
2024-03-15 14:35,containment,C2 domain blocked on firewall,analyst_msmith,Palo Alto rule deployed
2024-03-15 15:00,eradication,Enterprise-wide IOC scan initiated,analyst_jdoe,Splunk search across all indices
2024-03-15 15:30,containment,3 additional hosts identified and isolated,analyst_msmith,Lateral movement confirmed
2024-03-15 16:00,eradication,Malware removed from all affected hosts,analyst_tier3,CrowdStrike RTR cleanup
2024-03-15 18:00,recovery,Systems restored and monitored,analyst_msmith,72-hour monitoring period started

Step 5: Build SOC Operations Dashboard

Track overall SOC performance metrics:

--- Incident volume by severity (last 30 days)
index=notable earliest=-30d
| stats count by urgency
| eval order = case(urgency="critical", 1, urgency="high", 2, urgency="medium", 3,
                    urgency="low", 4, urgency="informational", 5)
| sort order

--- MTTD (Mean Time to Detect)
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttd_minutes = round((time_of_first_event - orig_time) / 60, 1)
| stats avg(mttd_minutes) AS avg_mttd, median(mttd_minutes) AS med_mttd,
        perc95(mttd_minutes) AS p95_mttd

--- MTTR (Mean Time to Respond/Resolve)
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label="Resolved*"
| eval mttr_hours = round((status_end - _time) / 3600, 1)
| stats avg(mttr_hours) AS avg_mttr, median(mttr_hours) AS med_mttr by urgency

--- Analyst workload distribution
index=notable earliest=-7d
| stats count by owner
| sort - count

--- Alert disposition breakdown
index=notable earliest=-30d status_label IN ("Resolved*", "Closed*")
| stats count by disposition
| eval percentage = round(count / sum(count) * 100, 1)
| sort - count

Step 6: Build Executive Briefing Dashboard

Create a high-level dashboard for leadership during major incidents:

--- Executive summary panel
| makeresults
| eval metrics = "Business Impact: 1 file server offline (Finance dept), "
                ."Estimated Recovery: 4 hours, "
                ."Data Loss Risk: Low (backups verified), "
                ."Customer Impact: None, "
                ."Regulatory Notification: Not required (no PII exposure confirmed)"

--- Trend comparison (this month vs last month)
index=notable earliest=-60d
| eval period = if(_time > relative_time(now(), "-30d"), "Current Month", "Previous Month")
| stats count by period, urgency
| chart sum(count) AS incidents by period, urgency

--- Top threat categories
index=notable earliest=-30d
| top rule_name limit=10
| table rule_name, count, percent

Step 7: Automate Dashboard Updates

Use Splunk scheduled searches to maintain dashboard data:

--- Scheduled search to update affected systems lookup (runs every 5 minutes)
index=* (src_ip IN [| inputlookup ir_ioc_list.csv | search ioc_type="ip"
                    | fields ioc_value | rename ioc_value AS src_ip])
earliest=-1h
| stats latest(_time) AS last_seen, count AS event_count,
        values(sourcetype) AS data_sources by src_ip
| eval status = if(last_seen > relative_time(now(), "-15m"), "Active", "Dormant")
| outputlookup ir_affected_systems_auto.csv

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Situational AwarenessReal-time understanding of incident scope, affected systems, and response progress
MTTDMean Time to Detect — average time from threat occurrence to SOC alert generation
MTTRMean Time to Respond — average time from alert to incident resolution or containment
Containment RatePercentage of affected systems successfully isolated relative to total compromised systems
Burn-Down ChartVisual tracking of remaining open investigation tasks over time during an incident
Executive BriefingNon-technical summary dashboard showing business impact, timeline, and recovery status

Tools & Systems

  • Splunk Dashboard Studio: Modern dashboard framework with drag-and-drop visualization and real-time data
  • Elastic Kibana Dashboard: Visualization platform with Lens, Maps, and Canvas for security dashboards
  • Grafana: Open-source visualization platform supporting multiple data sources including Elasticsearch and Splunk
  • Microsoft Sentinel Workbooks: Azure-native dashboard framework with Kusto-based analytics visualization
  • TheHive: Open-source incident response platform with built-in case tracking and metrics dashboards

Common Scenarios

  • Active Ransomware Incident: Dashboard showing encryption spread, containment status, backup verification, recovery progress
  • Data Breach Investigation: Dashboard tracking affected data stores, exfiltration volume, notification requirements
  • Phishing Campaign Response: Dashboard showing recipient count, click rate, credential exposure, remediation status
  • Monthly SOC Report: Leadership dashboard with incident trends, MTTD/MTTR metrics, analyst performance
  • Compliance Audit: Dashboard demonstrating detection coverage, response SLA compliance, and incident closure metrics

Output Format

INCIDENT RESPONSE DASHBOARD — IR-2024-0450
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

STATUS: CONTAINMENT PHASE (6h 30m elapsed)

Affected Systems:          Containment Progress:
  Compromised:   2         [==========----------] 71%
  Investigating: 1         5 of 7 systems contained
  Contained:     3
  Recovered:     1

IOC Summary:               Response Timeline:
  IPs:      4              14:00 — Alert triggered
  Domains:  2              14:12 — Confirmed malicious
  Hashes:   3              14:23 — First host isolated
  URLs:     5              15:00 — Enterprise scan started
  Emails:   1              15:30 — 3 more hosts isolated

Key Metrics:
  MTTD:    12 minutes
  MTTC:    23 minutes (first host)
  Analysts Active: 3 (Tier 2: 2, Tier 3: 1)

Business Impact: LOW — Finance file server offline, no customer-facing systems affected

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する