本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

detecting-entra-offensive-tools-in-graph-logs

Hunt AADGraphActivityLogs and MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs in Microsoft Sentinel/Log Analytics using KQL to fingerprint offensive Entra ID enumeration tools such as ROADtools, AADInternals, and AzureHound, including User-Agent signatures, roadrecon endpoint sweeps, and sign-in correlation. Use when investigating suspicious Microsoft Graph API activity, Entra ID reconnaissance, or building Sentinel analytics rules to detect these tools.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md10.9 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.5 KB
  • references/standards.md1.3 KB
  • scripts/agent.py5.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Detecting Entra Offensive Tools in Graph Logs

Overview

For nearly a decade the legacy Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net) was a defender blind spot: requests to it produced no first-class activity log, so tools like ROADtools (roadrecon) and AADInternals — which lean heavily on AAD Graph — could enumerate an entire tenant with little trace. That changed when Microsoft shipped AADGraphActivityLogs (general availability in 2026), the counterpart to the already-available MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs (graph.microsoft.com). Together these two tables give SOCs request-level visibility into directory API traffic: the caller identity, app, source IP, HTTP method, request URI, and crucially the User-Agent.

This skill is the defensive complement to offensive Entra tooling. It hunts the two Graph activity tables for the behavioral and string fingerprints those tools leave behind. Many operators forget to spoof the User-Agent, so ROADtools (built on Python's aiohttp) emits a User-Agent like Python/3.12 aiohttp/3.10.4, and AADInternals frequently leaves AADInternals or library strings in the agent. Even when the agent is spoofed, the tools betray themselves through a characteristic endpoint-sweep pattern: roadrecon gather pulls users, groups, applications, serviceprincipals, devices, directoryroles, roledefinitions, oauth2permissiongrants, and more within a tight time window — a signature that survives header spoofing.

The activity being detected maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1078.004 – Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts: an adversary using legitimate (often phished or token-stolen) cloud credentials to enumerate and operate against the tenant via the Graph APIs. These detections both surface live intrusions and validate that the offensive techniques in the companion red-team skills are observable.

When to Use

  • Building or tuning detections for Microsoft Sentinel / Log Analytics covering Entra ID
  • Threat hunting after suspected credential theft, device-code phishing, or OAuth consent abuse
  • Purple-team exercises validating that ROADtools/AADInternals/AzureHound activity is detectable
  • Investigating an alert and needing to correlate Graph API calls back to a sign-in/session
  • Closing the legacy Azure AD Graph visibility gap after enabling AADGraphActivityLogs

Prerequisites

  • A Microsoft Sentinel workspace (or Log Analytics) ingesting:
    • MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs (diagnostic setting on Microsoft Entra ID -> graph.microsoft.com)
    • AADGraphActivityLogs (diagnostic setting on Microsoft Entra ID -> legacy Azure AD Graph)
  • SigninLogs and AADNonInteractiveUserSignInLogs for correlation
  • Microsoft Sentinel Reader/Responder (or Log Analytics Reader) RBAC to run KQL
  • Familiarity with Kusto Query Language (KQL)
  • Enable the diagnostic settings (Azure Portal -> Microsoft Entra ID -> Diagnostic settings -> send MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs and AADGraphActivityLogs to your workspace), or via CLI:
    az monitor diagnostic-settings create \
      --name "entra-graph-logs" \
      --resource "/providers/microsoft.aadiam/diagnosticSettings" \
      --logs '[{"category":"MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs","enabled":true},{"category":"AADGraphActivityLogs","enabled":true}]' \
      --workspace "<log-analytics-workspace-id>"
    

Objectives

  • Confirm both Graph activity tables are flowing into the workspace
  • Detect User-Agent string fingerprints of ROADtools, AADInternals, and AzureHound
  • Detect the endpoint-sweep behavioral fingerprint that survives User-Agent spoofing
  • Correlate suspicious Graph activity back to a sign-in/session and source identity
  • Operationalize the best queries as scheduled analytics rules

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

IDTechniqueApplication in this skill
T1078.004Valid Accounts: Cloud AccountsDetecting adversaries using valid cloud credentials/tokens to enumerate the tenant via the Microsoft Graph and legacy Azure AD Graph APIs

Related techniques surfaced by these hunts: T1087.004 Account Discovery: Cloud Account, T1069.003 Permission Groups Discovery: Cloud Groups, T1526 Cloud Service Discovery.

Workflow

Step 1: Confirm both tables are ingesting

Before hunting, verify the data exists and inspect the schema fields you will pivot on.

union withsource=Tbl MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs, AADGraphActivityLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)
| summarize Records=count(), LastSeen=max(TimeGenerated) by Tbl

Step 2: Hunt User-Agent fingerprints (ROADtools / aiohttp)

ROADtools uses aiohttp; an un-spoofed run shows python + aiohttp in the User-Agent.

AADGraphActivityLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(7d)
| where RequestMethod == "GET"
| where UserAgent contains "python" and UserAgent contains "aiohttp"
| summarize RequestCount = count() by CallerIpAddress, AppId, UserAgent, UserId
| sort by RequestCount desc

Step 3: Hunt AADInternals and AzureHound agents

AADInternals leaves toolkit/library strings; AzureHound's Go HTTP client and BloodHound tooling have distinctive agents.

union MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs, AADGraphActivityLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(7d)
| where UserAgent has_any ("AADInternals", "aad-internals", "azurehound",
                           "BloodHound", "python-requests", "Go-http-client")
| project TimeGenerated, UserAgent, CallerIpAddress, AppId, UserId, RequestUri
| sort by TimeGenerated desc

Step 4: Behavioral hunt — the roadrecon endpoint sweep (spoof-resistant)

Even with a spoofed agent, roadrecon gather touches a recognizable set of directory resources in a short window. Bucket by user and 5 minutes; alert when one identity hits the full sweep.

AADGraphActivityLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)
| where RequestMethod == "GET"
| extend TopLevelResource = tolower(tostring(split(split(RequestUri, "?")[0], "/")[3]))
| summarize
    TopLevelResources = make_set(TopLevelResource),
    AppIds = make_set(AppId),
    CallerIPs = make_set(CallerIpAddress),
    UserAgents = make_set(UserAgent),
    StartTime = min(TimeGenerated),
    EndTime = max(TimeGenerated)
    by UserId, bin(TimeGenerated, 5m)
| where TopLevelResources has_all ("users", "tenantdetails", "groups", "applications",
    "serviceprincipals", "devices", "directoryroles", "roledefinitions", "contacts",
    "oauth2permissiongrants", "authorizationpolicy")
| project StartTime, EndTime, UserId, AppIds, CallerIPs, UserAgents

Step 5: High-volume enumeration outliers

Catch tooling that simply makes far more directory reads than a human in a short window.

MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)
| where RequestMethod == "GET"
| where RequestUri has_any ("/users", "/groups", "/servicePrincipals", "/applications",
                            "/directoryRoles", "/roleManagement")
| summarize Reads=count(), Resources=dcount(RequestUri) by UserId, AppId, CallerIpAddress, bin(TimeGenerated, 10m)
| where Reads > 200
| sort by Reads desc

Step 6: Correlate Graph activity to the originating sign-in

Pivot a suspicious Graph caller back to the sign-in to recover device, location, MFA, and conditional-access result. Note the SignInActivityId in AADGraphActivityLogs may carry == padding versus SigninLogs.UniqueTokenIdentifier.

AADGraphActivityLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(1d)
| where UserAgent contains "aiohttp"
| extend TokenId = trim_end("=", tostring(SignInActivityId))
| join kind=leftouter (
    SigninLogs
    | extend TokenId = tostring(UniqueTokenIdentifier)
    | project TokenId, UserPrincipalName, IPAddress, AppDisplayName, ConditionalAccessStatus, DeviceDetail
) on TokenId
| project TimeGenerated, UserId, UserPrincipalName, CallerIpAddress, IPAddress,
          AppDisplayName, ConditionalAccessStatus, UserAgent

Step 7: Operationalize as analytics rules

Promote the highest-fidelity queries (Steps 2-4) to scheduled analytics rules. Set a query period/frequency (e.g., run every 1h over 1d), map the rule to T1078.004, and configure entity mappings (Account = UserId, IP = CallerIpAddress, Host/App = AppId) so incidents enrich automatically. Tune out known automation/service-principal App IDs and approved scanner IPs via a watchlist before enabling.

Tools and Resources

ResourcePurposeSource
AADGraphActivityLogs referenceSchema and field meaninghttps://learn.microsoft.com/entra/identity/monitoring-health/concept-aad-graph-activity-logs
MicrosoftGraphActivityLogsGraph API activity schemahttps://learn.microsoft.com/graph/microsoft-graph-activity-logs-overview
Invictus-IR writeupAADGraphActivityLogs hunting querieshttps://www.invictus-ir.com/news/the-missing-link-aadgraphactivitylogs-finally-arrives
Cloudbrothers analysisBehavioral fingerprinting of ROADtoolshttps://cloudbrothers.info/en/aadgraphactivitylogs/
ROADtoolsThe offensive tool being detectedhttps://github.com/dirkjanm/ROADtools
MITRE T1078.004Valid Accounts: Cloud Accountshttps://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078/004/

Detection Fingerprint Reference

ToolPrimary fingerprintTable
ROADtools (roadrecon)python + aiohttp UA; full directory endpoint sweep in 5 minAADGraphActivityLogs
AADInternalsAADInternals / toolkit strings in UA; AAD Graph readsAADGraphActivityLogs
AzureHoundGo HTTP client UA; broad MS Graph enumerationMicrosoftGraphActivityLogs
Generic reconHigh GET volume across users/groups/apps/SPs in short windowboth

Validation Criteria

  • Both MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs and AADGraphActivityLogs confirmed ingesting
  • User-Agent fingerprint hunt for ROADtools/aiohttp executed
  • AADInternals/AzureHound agent hunt executed
  • Behavioral endpoint-sweep hunt executed and tuned for false positives
  • High-volume enumeration outlier query executed
  • At least one finding correlated back to a sign-in/session and source identity
  • Best queries promoted to scheduled analytics rules with T1078.004 mapping and entity mappings
  • Known-good service principals/IPs excluded via watchlist to control false positives

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する