本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ca-breach-notification

Executes breach notification under California Civil Code Section 1798.82 (California data breach notification law). Covers data elements triggering notification, timing requirements (most expedient time possible), AG notification for 500+ California residents, specific content and format requirements, and substitute notice provisions. Keywords: California, breach notification, Cal. Civ. Code 1798.82, attorney general, CCPA, data elements.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB
  • assets/template.md3.4 KB
  • references/standards.md2.9 KB
  • references/workflows.md2.3 KB
  • scripts/process.py6.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Executing California Breach Notification

Overview

California was the first US state to enact a data breach notification law (SB 1386, 2003). Cal. Civ. Code §1798.82 requires any person, business, or state agency that owns or licenses computerized data containing personal information to notify California residents when unencrypted personal information has been (or is reasonably believed to have been) acquired by an unauthorized person. The California Attorney General must be notified when more than 500 California residents are affected.

Covered Data Elements — Cal. Civ. Code §1798.81.5(d)

A breach notification is triggered when an individual's first name or first initial and last name is combined with any of the following unencrypted or unredacted data elements:

Data ElementCategory
Social Security numberGovernment identifier
Driver's license number or California identification card numberGovernment identifier
Financial account number, credit card number, or debit card number, in combination with any required security code, access code, or passwordFinancial
Medical informationHealth
Health insurance informationHealth
Unique biometric data (fingerprint, retina, iris image, or other unique physical representation or digital representation used for authentication)Biometric
Information or data collected through automated license plate recognition systemsSurveillance
Genetic dataGenetic
A username or email address, in combination with a password or security question and answer that would permit access to an online accountCredentials
Tax identification numberGovernment identifier

Note: "Personal information" does not include publicly available information that is lawfully made available to the general public from federal, state, or local government records.

Notification Timing — "Most Expedient Time Possible"

Cal. Civ. Code §1798.82(a): Notification must be made "in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay."

What Constitutes "Unreasonable Delay"

  • The statute does not define a specific number of days.
  • California AG guidance interprets this as requiring notification as soon as the investigation has progressed sufficiently to determine that notification is required.
  • Investigation and law enforcement coordination are recognized legitimate reasons for delay.
  • Internal approval processes and desire to prepare PR responses are NOT legitimate reasons for delay.

Law Enforcement Delay — §1798.82(c)

Notification may be delayed if a law enforcement agency determines that notification would impede a criminal investigation. The notification must be made "promptly" after the law enforcement agency determines notification will not compromise the investigation.

AG Notification — §1798.82(f)

RequirementDetail
Threshold500 or more California residents affected
MethodElectronic submission to the California AG's office (oag.ca.gov/privacy/databreach/reporting)
ContentSample copy of the individual notification letter
TimingConcurrent with or before individual notification

Individual Notification Content Requirements — §1798.82(d)

The notification must include:

  1. Name and contact information of the notifying entity.
  2. List of the types of personal information that were or are reasonably believed to have been the subject of the breach.
  3. Date of the breach (if known) and the date of the notice.
  4. Whether notification was delayed as a result of a law enforcement investigation (if applicable).
  5. General description of the breach incident, if that information is possible to determine at the time of notice.
  6. Toll-free telephone numbers, addresses, and websites for the major credit reporting agencies (if the breach involved a Social Security number, driver's license number, or California identification card number).
  7. Statement about availability of a security freeze (if SSN is involved): information about the right to place a security freeze on credit files under Cal. Civ. Code §1785.11.2.

Format Requirements — §1798.82(d)

California has specific formatting requirements for breach notification letters:

  • Title: "Notice of Data Breach" — must be prominently displayed.
  • Headings: Must use the following headings (or substantially similar):
    • "What Happened"
    • "What Information Was Involved"
    • "What We Are Doing"
    • "What You Can Do"
    • "For More Information"
  • Font: 10-point type or larger.
  • Language: Written in plain, easily understood language.

Substitute Notice — §1798.82(j)

Substitute notice is permitted when:

  • The cost of individual notice exceeds $250,000; OR
  • The number of affected persons exceeds 500,000; OR
  • The entity does not have sufficient contact information.

Substitute notice must include ALL of the following:

  1. Email notice to affected persons for whom email addresses are available.
  2. Conspicuous posting on the entity's website.
  3. Notification to major statewide media.

Encryption Safe Harbor

Encrypted personal information is excluded from the notification requirement IF:

  • The encryption key has not been (and is not reasonably believed to have been) acquired by an unauthorized person.
  • The data was encrypted using an algorithm that meets industry standards (AES-128 or higher).

Interaction with CCPA/CPRA

The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) as amended by CPRA provides a private right of action for data breaches under Cal. Civ. Code §1798.150:

  • Applies when "nonencrypted and nonredacted personal information" is subject to unauthorized access and exfiltration, theft, or disclosure as a result of the business's failure to implement reasonable security.
  • Statutory damages: $100 to $750 per consumer per incident, OR actual damages (whichever is greater).
  • Must provide 30-day cure notice before filing suit.

Key Enforcement Actions

  • Hanna Andersson (2020): $400,000 settlement for delayed notification of a Magecart web-skimming breach affecting California consumers. AG cited failure to notify "in the most expedient time possible."
  • DoorDash (2020): AG investigation into breach affecting 4.9 million individuals. AG scrutinized the adequacy and timeliness of notification.
  • T-Mobile (2022): $350 million class-action settlement (national) with significant California consumer component. AG office monitored compliance with California-specific notification requirements.

Sample AG Submission Cover Letter

To: California Office of the Attorney General Privacy Enforcement Section oag.ca.gov/privacy/databreach/reporting

Re: Data Breach Notification — Stellar Payments Group Breach Date: 13 March 2026 California Residents Affected: 2,340

Pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code §1798.82(f), Stellar Payments Group hereby provides notice of a data breach affecting 2,340 California residents. Enclosed is a sample copy of the notification letter being sent to affected individuals. Individual notifications will be dispatched on 28 March 2026.

Contact: Dr. Elena Vasquez, DPO, dpo@stellarpayments.eu, +1 (202) 555-0142.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する