本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

consent-platform-eval

Framework for evaluating and selecting Consent Management Platforms (CMPs). Covers TCF v2.2 certification requirements, Global Privacy Control support, multi-regulation compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD), A/B testing capabilities, API integration options, reporting features, and a structured vendor comparison methodology.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md9.0 KB
  • assets/template.md3.1 KB
  • references/standards.md3.2 KB
  • references/workflows.md4.6 KB
  • scripts/process.py10.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Evaluating Consent Management Platforms

Overview

A Consent Management Platform (CMP) is the technology layer that handles cookie consent collection, preference management, consent record storage, and signal propagation to downstream systems. Selecting the right CMP is critical for compliance with GDPR, ePrivacy, CCPA/CPRA, LGPD, and other regulations. The IAB Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF) v2.2 certification is a key differentiator for CMPs operating in the EU advertising ecosystem.

Evaluation Criteria

Category 1: Regulatory Compliance (Weight: 30%)

CriterionDescriptionScoring
TCF v2.2 CertificationCMP is registered with IAB Europe and passes compliance auditsRequired for EU advertising
GDPR ComplianceSupports Art. 7 consent requirements, Art. 7(3) withdrawal, Art. 7(1) recordsMandatory for EU operations
CCPA/CPRA SupportSupports "Do Not Sell" opt-out, GPC signal detection, CPRA requirementsRequired for US operations
LGPD SupportBrazilian data protection law consent requirementsRequired for Brazil operations
GPC SupportDetects and honors Global Privacy Control (Sec-GPC: 1) signalRequired for CA, CO, CT, MT, TX, OR
CNIL ComplianceEqual prominence accept/reject, 6-month reconsent, no cookie wallsRequired for French operations
Multi-JurisdictionAbility to apply different consent rules based on user locationCritical for global operations
Cookie ScanningAutomated scanning to detect and classify all cookies on the siteImportant for completeness

Category 2: Technical Capabilities (Weight: 25%)

CriterionDescriptionScoring
API IntegrationRESTful API for consent state queries from backend systemsCritical for server-side enforcement
Tag Manager IntegrationNative integration with Google Tag Manager, Tealium, SegmentReduces implementation effort
SDK AvailabilityMobile SDKs (iOS, Android) and server-side SDKsRequired for mobile apps
PerformancePage load impact (target: <100ms additional latency)Critical for UX
CustomizationUI customization (colors, layout, language, button text)Important for brand consistency
A/B TestingBuilt-in consent banner experimentation (within compliance boundaries)Important for optimization
GeolocationAccurate user location detection for jurisdiction-specific rulesCritical for multi-region
TC String GenerationGenerates IAB TC String for ad tech ecosystem integrationRequired for advertising

Category 3: Consent Record Management (Weight: 20%)

CriterionDescriptionScoring
Consent ReceiptsGenerates audit-ready consent receipts per Art. 7(1)Critical for compliance
Version ControlTracks consent text versions with change historyImportant for audit trail
Consent HistoryFull history per user (grants, withdrawals, re-consents)Critical for DSAR support
Data ExportExport consent records in standard formats (JSON, CSV)Important for portability
Retention ControlsConfigurable consent record retention periodsImportant for data minimization
Search and QuerySearch consent records by user, purpose, date rangeImportant for DPA inquiries
Proof of ConsentCan generate evidence packages for regulatory inquiriesCritical for enforcement defense

Category 4: Reporting and Analytics (Weight: 15%)

CriterionDescriptionScoring
Consent Rate DashboardReal-time consent/opt-out rates by purpose and regionImportant for monitoring
Trend AnalysisHistorical consent rate trends over timeImportant for strategy
Compliance ReportingPre-built reports aligned with GDPR, CCPA requirementsImportant for DPO
Custom ReportsAbility to create custom reports and dashboardsNice to have
AlertingAlerts for anomalous consent patterns (sudden drops, spikes)Important for incident detection
GPC ReportingReports on GPC signal detection rates and actions takenRequired for CPRA compliance

Category 5: Vendor and Support (Weight: 10%)

CriterionDescriptionScoring
Data Processing AgreementGDPR-compliant DPA availableMandatory
Data ResidencyEU data hosting available (for consent records)Required for EU operations
Sub-ProcessorsTransparent sub-processor listRequired per Art. 28
SLAUptime SLA (target: 99.9%+)Critical for availability
SupportDedicated support, privacy expertise, implementation guidanceImportant
Pricing ModelTransparent pricing (per pageview, per domain, flat rate)Important for budgeting

Vendor Comparison Matrix

FeatureOneTrustCookiebotUsercentricsDidomiQuantcast Choice
TCF v2.2 CertifiedYesYesYesYesYes
GDPR ComplianceFullFullFullFullFull
CCPA/CPRA SupportYesYesYesYesYes
GPC DetectionYesYesYesYesYes
LGPD SupportYesLimitedYesYesLimited
CNIL ComplianceYesYesYesYesYes
Multi-Jurisdiction100+ countries50+ countries50+ countries40+ countries30+ countries
Cookie ScannerAutomatedAutomatedAutomatedAutomatedAutomated
APIREST + GraphQLRESTRESTREST + GraphQLREST
Mobile SDKsiOS + AndroidLimitediOS + AndroidiOS + AndroidLimited
GTM IntegrationNativeNativeNativeNativeNative
A/B TestingBuilt-inVia APIBuilt-inBuilt-inLimited
Performance~80ms~60ms~70ms~75ms~50ms
Consent ReceiptsKantara-alignedBasicDetailedDetailedBasic
Version ControlYesYesYesYesYes
Data ExportJSON, CSV, APICSVJSON, CSV, APIJSON, CSVCSV
Consent DashboardAdvancedBasicAdvancedAdvancedBasic
EU Data HostingYes (Frankfurt)Yes (Copenhagen)Yes (Munich)Yes (Paris)Yes (Amsterdam)
DPA AvailableStandardStandardStandardStandardStandard
SLA99.99%99.9%99.95%99.9%99.9%
Pricing ModelPer sessionPer domainPer sessionPer pageviewFree (basic)
Starting Price~EUR 300/month~EUR 9/month~EUR 50/month~EUR 50/monthFree tier

Selection Process

Step 1: Requirements Gathering

Identify must-have requirements based on:

  • Jurisdictions where your organization operates
  • Number of domains and mobile apps
  • Advertising ecosystem participation (need TCF v2.2?)
  • Backend integration needs (API requirements)
  • Budget constraints

Step 2: Shortlist (3-4 Vendors)

Apply mandatory criteria as filters:

  • TCF v2.2 certification (if operating in EU ad tech)
  • GPC support (if serving US consumers)
  • EU data hosting (if required by data residency policy)

Step 3: Proof of Concept (2 Weeks per Vendor)

For each shortlisted vendor:

  • Implement on a staging environment
  • Test all consent flows (accept, refuse, manage, withdraw)
  • Measure page load impact
  • Test API integration with backend systems
  • Verify consent records meet Art. 7(1) requirements
  • Test multi-jurisdiction logic (EU vs US vs Brazil)

Step 4: Scoring and Selection

Score each vendor against the weighted criteria. Calculate weighted total score. Select the vendor with the highest score that meets all mandatory requirements.

CloudVault SaaS Inc. Selection

After evaluating five vendors, CloudVault SaaS Inc. selected Usercentrics based on:

  • Full TCF v2.2 certification
  • Native iOS and Android SDKs (critical for CloudVault mobile app)
  • Built-in A/B testing within CNIL compliance boundaries
  • Strong API for server-side consent state queries
  • EU data hosting in Munich (same jurisdiction as key customers)
  • Competitive pricing for the pageview volume

Key Regulatory References

  • IAB TCF v2.2 Specification — CMP certification and requirements
  • GDPR Article 7 — Conditions for consent (CMP must support)
  • GDPR Article 28 — Processor requirements (CMP as processor)
  • CPRA Section 1798.135(e) — GPC signal recognition
  • CNIL Deliberation 2020-091 — Cookie consent technical requirements
  • LGPD (Lei 13.709/2018) — Brazilian consent requirements
  • ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) — Cookie consent basis

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する