本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

gdpr-valid-consent

Guide for implementing GDPR-valid consent under Article 7 conditions and Article 4(11) definition. Covers five core requirements: freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous, and clear affirmative action. Includes pre-ticked boxes prohibition per Planet49 CJEU C-673/17, consent form audit checklist, and practical implementation patterns.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md8.8 KB
  • assets/template.md4.3 KB
  • references/standards.md4.1 KB
  • references/workflows.md4.4 KB
  • scripts/process.py9.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Implementing GDPR-Valid Consent

Overview

Valid consent under the GDPR is defined in Article 4(11) as "any freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the data subject's wishes by which he or she, by a statement or by a clear affirmative action, signifies agreement to the processing of personal data relating to him or her." Article 7 sets out the conditions for consent, and Recital 32 clarifies that silence, pre-ticked boxes, or inactivity do not constitute consent.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) reinforced this in Case C-673/17 (Planet49 GmbH, October 1, 2019), ruling that pre-ticked checkboxes do not constitute valid consent for placing cookies, and that consent must be specific to each processing purpose.

The Five Requirements of Valid Consent

1. Freely Given (Article 7(4), Recitals 42-43)

Consent is not freely given if:

  • There is a clear imbalance between the data subject and the controller (e.g., employer-employee relationships, public authority-citizen relationships)
  • Consent is bundled as a non-negotiable condition of a service (the "conditionality test" under Article 7(4))
  • The data subject suffers detriment for refusing or withdrawing consent
  • There is no genuine choice or the individual feels compelled to consent

CloudVault SaaS Inc. Implementation: CloudVault SaaS Inc. separates consent for core cloud storage services from consent for analytics and marketing. Users who decline marketing consent retain full access to storage functionality. The sign-up flow explicitly states: "Declining optional data processing will not affect your access to CloudVault storage services."

2. Specific (Article 6(1)(a), Recital 32)

Consent must be:

  • Granular: separate consent for each distinct purpose
  • Named: the controller and any third-party controllers must be specifically identified
  • Purpose-limited: clearly linked to a defined processing purpose

CloudVault SaaS Inc. Implementation: CloudVault SaaS Inc. presents three separate consent requests during onboarding:

  • "Allow CloudVault SaaS Inc. to analyze your file usage patterns to recommend storage optimization" (Purpose: Service improvement)
  • "Allow CloudVault SaaS Inc. to send you product update emails" (Purpose: Direct marketing)
  • "Allow CloudVault SaaS Inc. to share anonymized usage statistics with Datalytics Partners Ltd. for industry benchmarking" (Purpose: Third-party analytics)

3. Informed (Article 13, Recitals 42, 60)

Before consenting, the data subject must be told at minimum:

  • The identity of the controller (CloudVault SaaS Inc., registered at 42 Innovation Drive, Dublin, D02 YX88, Ireland)
  • The purpose of each processing operation for which consent is sought
  • The type of data collected
  • The right to withdraw consent at any time
  • Information about automated decision-making, including profiling (Article 22(2)(c))
  • Risks of data transfers to third countries without an adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards (relevant if Article 49(1)(a) explicit consent applies)

CloudVault SaaS Inc. Implementation: Each consent request includes a layered notice: a short-form summary visible immediately and a "Learn More" expandable section with full Article 13 information. The language is plain English at a Flesch-Kincaid grade level of 8 or below.

4. Unambiguous Indication

The data subject's intention must be clear. According to Recital 32:

  • Consent requires a clear affirmative act
  • Silence, pre-ticked boxes, or inactivity do not constitute consent (confirmed in CJEU C-673/17 Planet49)
  • Scrolling or continued browsing of a website does not meet this standard (EDPB Guidelines 05/2020, paragraph 86)

CloudVault SaaS Inc. Implementation: CloudVault SaaS Inc. uses unticked checkboxes for each consent purpose. The "Create Account" button is active regardless of consent choices. No default-on toggles are used. The UI state is logged to demonstrate that the user actively engaged each toggle.

5. Clear Affirmative Action (Article 4(11), Recital 32)

Acceptable forms of affirmative action include:

  • Ticking an unticked checkbox
  • Choosing technical settings on an information society service
  • Typing a consent statement
  • Signing a written declaration (including electronic signatures under eIDAS Regulation (EU) No 910/2014)

CloudVault SaaS Inc. Implementation: CloudVault SaaS Inc. records the specific UI interaction (checkbox tick, toggle switch activation) along with a timestamp, the user's session ID, the IP address, the version of the consent text displayed, and the user agent string.

Consent Form Audit Checklist

#Audit ItemGDPR ReferencePass/Fail Criteria
1Consent is separated from terms of serviceArt. 7(2)Consent request is clearly distinguishable from other matters
2No pre-ticked boxes or default-on togglesArt. 4(11), Recital 32, CJEU C-673/17All consent mechanisms start in the "off" state
3Granular consent per purposeRecital 32, EDPB Guidelines 05/2020Separate opt-in for each distinct processing purpose
4Controller identity statedArt. 7(2), Art. 13(1)(a)Full legal name and contact details of data controller visible
5Purpose clearly describedArt. 13(1)(c)Each purpose described in plain language without legal jargon
6Data types specifiedArt. 13(1)(d)Categories of personal data listed for each purpose
7Third-party recipients namedArt. 13(1)(e)Specific third parties (not categories) identified by name
8Withdrawal mechanism explainedArt. 7(3)Clear statement that consent can be withdrawn at any time with instructions
9No detriment for refusalArt. 7(4), Recital 42Service access not conditional on optional consent
10Withdrawal as easy as givingArt. 7(3)Withdrawal requires equal or fewer steps than initial consent
11Age verification presentArt. 8Age gate or verification for services directed at children
12Language is plain and clearArt. 7(2), Recital 42Flesch-Kincaid grade level 8 or below, no legal jargon
13Consent records storedArt. 7(1)Timestamp, version, purpose, mechanism, identity recorded
14Re-consent mechanism for purpose changesArt. 13(3)Process exists to obtain fresh consent when purposes change
15No cookie walls blocking accessEDPB Guidelines 05/2020 para 39Content accessible regardless of cookie consent choices

Implementation Workflow

  1. Map Processing Activities — Identify every processing activity that relies on consent as its lawful basis under Article 6(1)(a). Document the purpose, data categories, recipients, and retention period for each.

  2. Design Consent Mechanism — Create granular, unticked consent controls. Ensure the UI clearly separates each purpose. Follow EDPB Guidelines 05/2020 on consent.

  3. Draft Consent Language — Write concise, plain-language descriptions for each purpose. Include all Article 13 information in a layered format. Test readability at Flesch-Kincaid grade level 8 or below.

  4. Implement Record-Keeping — Build a consent receipt system that captures: timestamp (ISO 8601), consent version hash, purpose identifier, mechanism type (checkbox/toggle/signature), data subject identifier, and the exact text presented.

  5. Build Withdrawal Mechanism — Implement one-click withdrawal accessible from the user's account dashboard. Ensure withdrawal triggers downstream processing cessation within 24 hours.

  6. Run Audit — Use the checklist above to audit the consent implementation. Document findings and remediation actions.

  7. Schedule Re-Audit — Set a recurring audit cadence (quarterly recommended) and after any UI changes that affect consent flows.

Key Regulatory References

  • GDPR Article 4(11) — Definition of consent
  • GDPR Article 6(1)(a) — Consent as lawful basis
  • GDPR Article 7 — Conditions for consent
  • GDPR Article 8 — Conditions applicable to child's consent
  • GDPR Recitals 32, 33, 42, 43 — Guidance on consent requirements
  • CJEU Case C-673/17 (Planet49 GmbH) — Pre-ticked boxes ruling
  • EDPB Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679
  • eIDAS Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 — Electronic signatures for consent

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する