本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

global-privacy-control

Implementation guide for Global Privacy Control (GPC) automated opt-out signal per CPRA Section 1798.135(e). Covers Sec-GPC HTTP header detection, JavaScript navigator.globalPrivacyControl API, and state-specific requirements for CA, CO, CT, MT, TX, and OR. Includes server-side detection code and compliance mapping.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • assets/template.md4.0 KB
  • references/standards.md3.6 KB
  • references/workflows.md5.3 KB
  • scripts/process.py11.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Implementing Global Privacy Control (GPC)

Overview

Global Privacy Control (GPC) is a browser-level signal that communicates a user's privacy preference to opt out of the sale or sharing of their personal information. The GPC specification defines both an HTTP header (Sec-GPC: 1) and a JavaScript API (navigator.globalPrivacyControl) for transmitting this signal.

Under California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) Section 1798.135(e), businesses must treat GPC signals as valid opt-out requests. The California Attorney General confirmed this enforcement position in the Sephora settlement (August 2022, $1.2 million fine), which was the first enforcement action involving GPC signals.

Legal Requirements by State

California — CPRA (effective January 1, 2023)

  • Section 1798.135(e): A business that collects consumers' personal information shall treat the consumer's use of an opt-out preference signal as a valid request to opt out of sale/sharing under Section 1798.120.
  • AG Regulation 11 CCR 7025(b): If a business collects personal information from consumers online, the business shall treat an opt-out preference signal as a valid request to opt-out of sale/sharing for that browser or device and any consumer profile associated with that browser or device.
  • Sephora Settlement (August 2022): California AG fined Sephora $1.2 million for failing to honor GPC signals, among other violations.

Colorado — Colorado Privacy Act (CPA, effective July 1, 2024)

  • Section 6-1-1306(1)(a)(IV)(A): Consumers may exercise the right to opt out through an opt-out preference signal sent by a platform, technology, or mechanism on behalf of the consumer, to the extent technically feasible.
  • CPA Rules 4.6: Controllers must recognize universal opt-out mechanisms by July 1, 2024.

Connecticut — Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA, effective July 1, 2023)

  • Section 42-520(b)(5): Beginning January 1, 2025, controllers must recognize universal opt-out mechanisms for the sale of personal data and targeted advertising.

Montana — Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act (effective October 1, 2024)

  • Section 30-14-2807: Controllers must recognize opt-out preference signals as valid opt-out requests for the sale of personal data and targeted advertising.

Texas — Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA, effective July 1, 2024)

  • Section 541.055: Controllers must allow consumers to opt out of the sale of personal data and targeted advertising. Universal opt-out mechanisms must be honored beginning January 1, 2025.

Oregon — Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (effective July 1, 2024)

  • Section 646A.578: Controllers shall provide a method by which consumers can opt out that includes recognition of opt-out preference signals.

GPC Technical Specification

HTTP Header Detection

The GPC signal is transmitted as an HTTP request header:

Sec-GPC: 1

This header is set by the browser (or browser extension) on every HTTP request when the user has enabled GPC. The header is absent (not set to 0) when GPC is not enabled.

JavaScript API Detection

The GPC signal is also available via the JavaScript DOM API:

// Check if GPC is supported and enabled
if (navigator.globalPrivacyControl === true) {
    // User has opted out — do not sell/share personal information
    // Do not load non-essential tracking scripts
    // Set internal opt-out flag for this user
}

Key considerations:

  • navigator.globalPrivacyControl returns true when GPC is enabled
  • navigator.globalPrivacyControl returns false or undefined when GPC is not enabled or not supported
  • Check should occur before loading any tracking or advertising scripts

Server-Side Detection (HTTP Header)

On the server side, check for the Sec-GPC header in incoming requests:

If Sec-GPC header is present AND equals "1":
    → Set opt-out flag for this session/user
    → Do not initiate sale or sharing of personal information
    → Do not load third-party tracking pixels
    → Log GPC signal receipt for compliance records

Implementation Architecture at CloudVault SaaS Inc.

Client-Side Detection

CloudVault SaaS Inc. checks GPC at two points:

  1. Page Load: Before initializing any analytics or advertising SDKs, check navigator.globalPrivacyControl. If true, suppress non-essential tracking.

  2. Consent Banner Interaction: If GPC is detected, pre-select the "Opt Out of Sale/Sharing" option in the cookie consent banner and display a notice: "We detected your Global Privacy Control signal. Your opt-out preference has been applied."

Server-Side Processing

The CloudVault SaaS Inc. backend middleware:

  1. Inspects every incoming HTTP request for the Sec-GPC: 1 header.
  2. If detected, sets a session-level flag gpc_opt_out = true.
  3. If the request is associated with an authenticated user, propagates the opt-out to the user's consent record for applicable purposes (sale/sharing).
  4. Returns a Sec-GPC response header echoing the signal (transparency).
  5. Logs the GPC signal receipt with timestamp, user agent, and associated user ID (if authenticated).

Mapping GPC to Internal Consent System

GPC is a binary signal (opt out of sale/sharing). CloudVault SaaS Inc. maps it to specific consent purposes:

GPC SignalInternal PurposeAction
Sec-GPC: 1pur_benchmarking_003 (Third-party data sharing)Withdraw consent / opt out
Sec-GPC: 1pur_advertising_004 (Targeted advertising)Withdraw consent / opt out
Sec-GPC: 1pur_analytics_001 (Service improvement)No change (internal use, not sale/sharing)
Sec-GPC: 1pur_marketing_002 (Product emails)No change (direct marketing, not sale/sharing)

Conflict Resolution

When a user has manually opted in via the preference center but their browser sends GPC:

  • CPRA approach: GPC takes precedence. Per AG regulation 11 CCR 7025(c), if a conflict exists between the opt-out preference signal and the consumer's participation in a financial incentive program, the business shall respect the opt-out preference signal but may notify the consumer of the conflict and give the consumer the choice to confirm their participation.
  • CloudVault SaaS Inc. policy: Display a notification: "Your browser is sending a Global Privacy Control signal to opt out of data sharing. This overrides your previous opt-in. To continue sharing data for industry benchmarking, you can confirm your preference in Settings > Privacy."

Compliance Verification

To verify GPC implementation:

  1. Install a GPC-enabled browser or extension (Firefox with Enhanced Tracking Protection, DuckDuckGo browser, Brave browser, or the OptMeowt extension for Chrome)
  2. Navigate to CloudVault SaaS Inc. application
  3. Verify that Sec-GPC: 1 header is sent in network requests
  4. Confirm that tracking scripts are not loaded
  5. Confirm that the consent banner reflects the opt-out preference
  6. Verify server-side logs record the GPC signal
  7. Confirm that authenticated users have their consent record updated

Key Regulatory References

  • CPRA Section 1798.135(e) — Opt-out preference signal requirement
  • California AG Regulation 11 CCR 7025 — GPC implementation details
  • GPC Specification (globalprivacycontrol.org) — Technical standard
  • Colorado Privacy Act Section 6-1-1306(1)(a)(IV)(A) — Universal opt-out
  • Connecticut CTDPA Section 42-520(b)(5) — Universal opt-out mechanism
  • Montana MCDPA Section 30-14-2807 — Opt-out preference signals
  • Texas TDPSA Section 541.055 — Opt-out methods
  • Oregon OCPA Section 646A.578 — Opt-out preference signals
  • Sephora Settlement (California AG, August 2022) — First GPC enforcement

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

mukul975 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する